Assessing Driving Performance with Moderate Visual Field Loss

The minimum binocular horizontal field extent for driver licensing varies widely between states in the USA. The authors examined the relationship between visual field extent and open-road driving performance using a scoring method that measured the quality of specific skills for a range of general driving maneuvers, as well as maneuvers that the authors expected to be difficult for people with restricted fields. Twenty-eight current drivers with mild to moderate peripheral visual field restrictions (123 + or - 20 degrees, V4e target) drove the 14-mile route. While most subjects were scored as safe drivers, those with more restricted horizontal and vertical binocular field extents showed significantly poorer skills in maneuvers for which a wide field of vision is likely to be important (p < or = 0.05): speed matching when changing lanes, and maintaining lane position and keeping to the path of the curve when driving around curves. Further studies using similar assessment methods with drivers with more restricted fields are necessary to determine the minimum field extent for safe driving.

[1]  A. Burg.  The relationship between vision test scores and driving record; general findings , 1967 .

[2]  C. Johnson,et al.  Incidence of visual field loss in 20,000 eyes and its relationship to driving performance. , 1983, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  R Troutbeck,et al.  Effect of restriction of the binocular visual field on driving performance , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[4]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[5]  R W DANIELSON,et al.  The relationship of fields of vision to safety in driving; with a report of 680 drivers examined by various screening methods. , 1957, American journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  C. Owsley,et al.  Is glaucoma associated with motor vehicle collision involvement and driving avoidance? , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  M. Sloane,et al.  Visual processing impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older adults. , 1998, JAMA.

[8]  L Staplin,et al.  Retrospective evaluation of alternative vision screening criteria for older and younger drivers. , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  J. Wood,et al.  Elderly Drivers and Simulated Visual Impairment , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[10]  Wiebo H Brouwer,et al.  The effect of visual field defects on driving performance: a driving simulator study. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  E. Peli,et al.  Driver performance evaluation : Considerations underlying selection and design of routes , 2013 .

[12]  K. Ball,et al.  Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  J. Wood,et al.  The effect of artificial visual impairment on functional visual fields and driving performance , 1993 .

[14]  CynthiaOwsley,et al.  Older Drivers and Cataract : Driving Habits and Crash Risk , 2022 .

[15]  J. Szlyk,et al.  Assessment of driving performance in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  J. Wood,et al.  Effect of Visual Impairment on Driving , 1994, Human factors.

[17]  Eli Peli,et al.  Driving with Confidence: A Practical Guide to Driving with Low Vision , 2002 .

[18]  F. Ferris,et al.  New visual acuity charts for clinical research. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  Janet P Szlyk,et al.  Driving performance in patients with mild to moderate glaucomatous clinical vision changes. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.