Extending Experimental Control

Abstract One of the biggest problems faced by archaeologists engaged in flaked stone experiments is that of control. Controls are universally accepted as a way of ensuring reliability of experimental results used to interpret the archaeological record. Here, the use of a new and tightly controllable material in flaked stone experiments is proposed: porcelain. Unlike traditional approaches using stone, porcelain—while demonstrating comparable properties and fracture mechanics—can be more tightly controlled. As such, we suggest that its use ensures greater reliability in results derived from studies of tool manufacture and use and more potential for repeatability of experimental studies. A critique of previous approaches is followed by an assessment of porcelain as a suitable material for experimentation, in which two case studies that piloted the material are discussed. The first demonstrates its use in experiments regarding tool manufacture and skill. The second demonstrates its success in experiments dealing with observations of use-wear, such as projectile point impact fractures. The varied nature of these two studies aptly demonstrates the benefits of using porcelain as a controllable, moldable material.

[1]  Harold L. Dibble,et al.  The relative effects of core surface morphology on flake shape and other attributes , 2011 .

[2]  Udayan Senapati,et al.  Porcelain—Raw Materials, Processing, Phase Evolution, and Mechanical Behavior , 1998 .

[3]  Harold L. Dibble,et al.  Introducing a new experimental design for controlled studies of flake formation: results for exterior platform angle, platform depth, angle of blow, velocity, and force , 2009 .

[4]  Metin I. Eren,et al.  Middle Paleolithic Skill Level and the Individual Knapper: An Experiment , 2011, American Antiquity.

[5]  Christopher A. Bergman,et al.  Flint arrowhead breakage: examples from Ksar Akil, Lebanon , 1983 .

[6]  Josep Maria Vergès,et al.  What novice knappers have to learn to become expert stone toolmakers , 2010 .

[7]  Jeffrey R. Ferguson,et al.  The When, Where, and How of Novices in Craft Production , 2008 .

[8]  Anders Fischer,et al.  Macro and Micro Wear Traces on Lithic Projectile Points: Experimental Results and Prehistoric Examples , 1984 .

[9]  Phillip H. Shelley Variation in Lithic Assemblages: An Experiment , 1990 .

[10]  John D. Speth,et al.  Miscellaneous Studies in Hard-Hammer Percussion Flaking: The Effects of Oblique Impact , 1975, American Antiquity.

[11]  John E. Dockall Wear Traces and Projectile Impact: A Review of the Experimental and Archaeological Evidence , 1997 .

[12]  Nyree Finlay,et al.  Blank Concerns: Issues of Skill and Consistency in the Replication of Scottish Later Mesolithic Blades , 2008 .

[13]  G. Frison,et al.  Fossil Bison and Artifacts From an Early Altithermal Period Arroyo Trap in Wyoming , 1976, American Antiquity.

[14]  Radu Iovita,et al.  Projectile impact fractures and launching mechanisms: results of a controlled ballistic experiment using replica Levallois points , 2014 .

[15]  C. A. Bergman,et al.  Hunters at Hengistbury: Some evidence from experimental archaeology , 1982 .

[16]  H. Dibble,et al.  The Effect of Hammer Mass and Velocity on Flake Mass , 1995 .