The value of a kurtosis metric in estimating the hazard to hearing of complex industrial noise exposures.

A series of Gaussian and non-Gaussian equal energy noise exposures were designed with the objective of establishing the extent to which the kurtosis statistic could be used to grade the severity of noise trauma produced by the exposures. Here, 225 chinchillas distributed in 29 groups, with 6 to 8 animals per group, were exposed at 97 dB SPL. The equal energy exposures were presented either continuously for 5 d or on an interrupted schedule for 19 d. The non-Gaussian noises all differed in the level of the kurtosis statistic or in the temporal structure of the noise, where the latter was defined by different peak, interval, and duration histograms of the impact noise transients embedded in the noise signal. Noise-induced trauma was estimated from auditory evoked potential hearing thresholds and surface preparation histology that quantified sensory cell loss. Results indicated that the equal energy hypothesis is a valid unifying principle for estimating the consequences of an exposure if and only if the equivalent energy exposures had the same kurtosis. Furthermore, for the same level of kurtosis the detailed temporal structure of an exposure does not have a strong effect on trauma.

[1]  Bob Davis,et al.  The effects of the amplitude distribution of equal energy exposures on noise-induced hearing loss: the kurtosis metric. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  R. Hamernik,et al.  Susceptibility of the noise-toughened auditory system to noise-induced trauma , 1999, Hearing Research.

[3]  W A Ahroon,et al.  Hearing threshold shifts from repeated 6-h daily exposure to impact noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  James D. Miller,et al.  CUMULATIVE AUDITORY EFFECTS RESULTING FROM MULTIPLE EXPOSURE TO INTENSE ACOUSTIC STIMULATION. PART 1. DEAFENING EFFECTS OF NOISE ON THE CAT , 1962 .

[5]  W. W. Clark,et al.  Effect of periodic rest on hearing loss and cochlear damage following exposure to noise. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  R. Salvi,et al.  Evoked‐response audibility curve of the chinchilla , 1973 .

[7]  J R Franks,et al.  Hearing loss in the chinchilla from impact and continuous noise exposure. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  W A Ahroon,et al.  Complex noise exposures: an energy analysis. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Lin Zeng,et al.  Application of the Kurtosis Statistic to the Evaluation of the Risk of Hearing Loss in Workers Exposed to High-Level Complex Noise , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[10]  R P Hamernik,et al.  A generalized approach to random noise synthesis: theory and computer simulation. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  W A Ahroon,et al.  The application of frequency and time domain kurtosis to the assessment of hazardous noise exposures. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Bob Davis,et al.  Hearing loss from interrupted, intermittent, and time varying non-Gaussian noise exposure: The applicability of the equal energy hypothesis. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  J. D. Miller,et al.  A frequency-position map for the chinchilla cochlea. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  W. Dixon Ward,et al.  Effect of Temporal Spacing on Temporary Threshold Shift from Impulses , 1962 .

[15]  R. Hamernik,et al.  Cochlear toughening, protection, and potentiation of noise-induced trauma by non-Gaussian noise. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  J Erdreich,et al.  A distribution based definition of impulse noise. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  E. Borg,et al.  Protection against noise trauma by pre-exposure to a low level acoustic stimulus , 1988, Hearing Research.

[18]  D Henderson,et al.  Impact noise: the importance of level, duration, and repetition rate. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Angela Martin The equal energy concept applied to impulse noise , 1975 .

[20]  C Meyer-Bisch,et al.  Hearing loss due to partly impulsive industrial noise exposure at levels between 87 and 90 dB(A). , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  R. Salvi,et al.  Comparison of psychophysical and evoked-potential tuning curves in the chinchilla. , 1982, American journal of otolaryngology.

[22]  Roger P. Hamernik,et al.  Performance Characteristics of a Phase Domain Approach to Random Noise Synthesis , 1991 .

[23]  R P Hamernik,et al.  Energy-independent factors influencing noise-induced hearing loss in the chinchilla model. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Bob Davis,et al.  Hearing loss from interrupted, intermittent, and time varying Gaussian noise exposures: the applicability of the equal energy hypothesis. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  R Lataye,et al.  Applicability of the L(eq) as a damage-risk criterion: an animal experiment. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  C. G. Rice,et al.  Hazardous exposure to impulse noise. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  D. Henderson,et al.  Asymptotic threshold shift in chinchillas exposed to impulse noise. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.