Bond strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin prepared with three different diamond burs.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the micro-tensile bond strength (mu TBS) of a control etch-and-rinse and three self-etch (strong, mild, ultra-mild) adhesive systems to dentin prepared with three different grit size of diamond burs. METHODS Dentin surfaces were created from mid-coronal sound dentin in extracted, human third molars. The teeth were ground with high-speed medium grit (100 microm), fine grit (30 microm), or extra-fine grit (15 microm) diamond bur. Resin composite (Z100) was bonded to the surfaces using Optibond FL, Adper Prompt L-Pop, Clearfil SE Bond, or Clearfil S3 Bond. Rectangular micro-specimens were prepared using the slow-speed diamond saw and tested in tensile to determine the mu TBS. Failure analysis was performed using a stereo-microscope and Fe-SEM. Data were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's HSD test (p<0.05). RESULTS The etch-and-rinse adhesive yielded high micro-tensile values (58-69 MPa), irrespective of the diamond burs used. The bond strength values were comparable for Adper Prompt L-Pop and Clearfil SE Bond irrespective of the burs used. The mu TBS values were significantly higher as the particle size of diamond burs is smaller for Clearfil S3 Bond. Most failures were recorded as interfacial failure when the fine and extra-fine diamond burs were used. SIGNIFICANCE Overall, different grit-sized diamond burs did not affect the mechanical properties of the interface, except for the ultra-mild one step self-etch adhesive. This adhesive performed significantly better when a smaller grit size was used to prepare dentin surface.

[1]  C. Tani,et al.  Effect of smear layer thickness on bond strength mediated by three all-in-one self-etching priming adhesives. , 2002, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[2]  J. Perdigão,et al.  Bonding characteristics of self-etching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel. , 2003, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[3]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. , 2005, Operative dentistry.

[4]  E. Swift,et al.  Effect of bur type on microtensile bond strengths of self-etching systems to human dentin. , 2004, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[5]  A. Reis,et al.  Effect of smear layer thickness and acidity of self-etching solutions on early and long-term bond strength to dentin. , 2005, Journal of dentistry.

[6]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. , 2001, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[7]  A. Bedran-Russo,et al.  Interfacial ultramorphology of single-step adhesives: nanoleakage as a function of time. , 2007, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[8]  G. Marshall,et al.  The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system. , 2003, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[9]  S. Inoue,et al.  Bond strength of simplified-step adhesives to enamel prepared with two different diamond burs. , 2004, Australian dental journal.

[10]  F. García-Godoy,et al.  Effects of diamond bur particle size on dentin bond strength. , 2004, American journal of dentistry.

[11]  W. Brackett,et al.  One-year clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive in class V resin composites cured by two methods. , 2002, Operative dentistry.

[12]  F. N. Nogueira,et al.  Effect of smear layer thickness and pH of self-etching adhesive systems on the bond strength and gap formation to dentin. , 2005, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[13]  D. Pashley,et al.  Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. , 2001, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[14]  D. Pashley,et al.  Hybridization of Dental Hard Tissues , 1998 .

[15]  D. Pashley,et al.  Effect of smear layers on the bonding of a self-etching primer to dentin. , 2000, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[16]  L. Tao,et al.  Effect of different types of smear layers on dentin and enamel shear bond strengths. , 1988, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[17]  van Dijken Jw Durability of three simplified adhesive systems in Class V non-carious cervical dentin lesions. , 2004 .

[18]  J Tagami,et al.  Effects of different burs on dentin bond strengths of self-etching primer bonding systems. , 2001, Operative dentistry.

[19]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Field emission SEM comparison of four postfixation drying techniques for human dentin. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[20]  N. Nakabayashi,et al.  Bonding to dentin with a self-etching primer: the effect of smear layers. , 2001, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[21]  D. Pashley,et al.  An ultrastructural study of the influence of acidity of self-etching primers and smear layer thickness on bonding to intact dentin. , 2000, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[22]  J. Nör Buonocore Memorial Lecture: Tooth Regeneration in Operative Dentistry , 2006 .

[23]  J. Tagami,et al.  Effect of self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid etchant on bonding to bur-prepared dentin. , 2002, Operative dentistry.

[24]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. , 2003, Operative dentistry.