Manufacturing Strategy: Testing the Cumulative Model in a Multiple Country Context*

This study statistically tests the cumulative model for the building of manufacturing capabilities by comparing and contrasting the manufacturing strategies of 265 North. American, 129 European, and 167 Korean factories by region. The cumulative model suggests that better performing competitors build one manufacturing capability upon another in a sequential, cumulative fashion—starting first with quality, followed by dependability, delivery, cost efficiency, flexibility, and lastly, innovation. The primary findings of this exploratory study are as follows: (1) the data yielded some evidence for the cumulative model, with the Korean data being the most supportive of the model; (2) North American, European, and Korean managers take different approaches to improved competitiveness; and (3) rather than focusing on one or two capabilities, better performing firms generally compete on the basis of multiple capabilities. That quality is not only at the base of the cumulative model but is often among the multiple capabilities shows the importance of quality management globally.

[1]  A. Meyer,et al.  Lasting Improvements in Manufacturing Performance: In Search of a New Theory , 1990 .

[2]  Colin New,et al.  World‐class Manufacturing versus Strategic Trade‐offs , 1992 .

[3]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Success factors in manufacturing , 1992 .

[4]  Thomas E. Vollmann,et al.  Evolving Global Manufacturing Strategies: Projections into the 1990s , 1986 .

[5]  Cecil C. Bozarth,et al.  Factory focus: Segmenting markets from an operations perspective , 1991 .

[6]  Kenneth K. Boyer,et al.  MANUFACTURING PROACTIVENESS AND PERFORMANCE , 1994 .

[7]  Jeffrey Miller,et al.  Flexibility: The Next Competitive Battle: The Manufacturing Futures Survey , 1989 .

[8]  Paul M. Swamidass,et al.  Manufacturing strategy, environmental uncertainty and performance: a path analytic model , 1987 .

[9]  Terry Hill,et al.  Flexibility – A Manufacturing Conundrum , 1991 .

[10]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Trade-offs? What Trade-offs? Competence and Competitiveness in Manufacturing Strategy , 1993 .

[11]  Rhonda L. Hensley,et al.  A Review of Empirical Manufacturing Strategy Studies , 1994 .

[12]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR QUALITY MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND AN ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENT , 1994 .

[13]  P. Swamidass,et al.  Assessing Operations Management from a Strategic Perspective , 1989 .

[14]  Ranga V. Ramasesh,et al.  Measurement of manufacturing flexibility: A value based approach , 1991 .

[15]  G. Pisano,et al.  Beyond World-Class : The New Manufacturing Strategy , 1994 .

[16]  D. Garvin.  Manufacturing Strategic Planning , 1993 .

[17]  Roger W. Schmenner,et al.  International factory productivity gains , 1991 .

[18]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  The Process of Manufacturing Strategy: Some Empirical Observations and Conclusions , 1991 .

[19]  Jan Olhager.  Manufacturing flexibility and profitability , 1993 .

[20]  Steven Wright.  Manufacturing strategy: Defining the missing link , 1984 .

[21]  Carl R. Anderson,et al.  An exploratory study of the manufacturing strategy process in practice , 1990 .

[22]  David Upton,et al.  Flexibility as process mobility: The management of plant capabilities for quick response manufacturing , 1995 .

[23]  Donald Gerwin,et al.  An agenda for research on the flexibility of manufacturing processes , 1987 .

[24]  A. Meyer,et al.  European manufacturers: The dangers of complacency , 1988 .

[25]  D. Clay Whybark.  Evolving the manufacturing strategy , 1987 .

[26]  Roger W. Schmenner,et al.  An International Comparison of Factory Productivity , 1990 .

[27]  A. Roth,et al.  A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies , 1994 .