Units invariant DEA when weight restrictions are present: ecological performance of US electricity industry

Electricity generation currently is the main industrial source of air emissions in the United States. Both researchers and practitioners are interested in conducting studies to evaluate the ecological performance of this industry, in order to propose solutions to curb emissions of air pollutants and to improve the efficiency of converting fossil resources into electric energy. In this paper, data envelopment analysis (DEA) is used to assess ecological efficiency where air emissions are used as undesirable outputs. Although conventional DEA does not require a priori information on the input and output weights, weight restrictions can be incorporated to reflect a user’s preference over the performance metrics, or to refine the DEA results. Adding weight restrictions voids the fact that DEA scores are independent of the units of measurement. To incorporate weight constraints in ecological efficiency assessment, this paper develops a DEA model that is units-invariant when weight restrictions are imposed. Moreover, the proposed model is equivalent to the standard units-invariant DEA model when weight restrictions are not present.

[1]  Nuria Ramón,et al.  A multiplier bound approach to assess relative efficiency in DEA without slacks , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Restricting virtual weights in data envelopment analysis , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  José L. Ruiz,et al.  On the DEA total weight flexibility and the aggregation in cross-efficiency evaluations , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Pekka J. Korhonen,et al.  ECO-EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF POWER PLANTS: AN EXTENSION OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[5]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Ecological modernization in the electrical utility industry: An application of a bads-goods DEA model of ecological and technical efficiency , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  William W. Cooper,et al.  SHORT COMMUNICATION: MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION MAKING UNITS , 1979 .

[7]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: History, Models, and Interpretations , 2011 .

[9]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  The adoption of environmental and risk management practices: Relationships to environmental performance , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[10]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Incorporating Value Judgments in DEA , 2004 .

[11]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[12]  J E Hardison,et al.  Benefit of the doubt. , 1985, The American journal of medicine.

[13]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) assessment of operational and environmental efficiencies on Japanese regional industries , 2014 .

[14]  T. Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA radial measurement for environmental assessment and planning: Desirable procedures to evaluate fossil fuel power plants , 2012 .

[15]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Programming with linear fractional functionals , 1962 .

[16]  Saisana Michaela Composite Indicator(s) , 2014 .

[17]  L. Cherchye,et al.  Legitimately Diverse, Yet Comparable: On Synthesizing Social Inclusion Performance in the EU , 2004 .

[18]  Chien-Ming Chen,et al.  Evaluating eco-efficiency with data envelopment analysis: an analytical reexamination , 2014, Ann. Oper. Res..

[19]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Centralised reallocation of emission permits using DEA , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Evaluating Academic Programs: With Applications to U.S. Graduate Decision Science Programs , 2006, Oper. Res..

[21]  Laurens Cherchye,et al.  An Introduction to ‘Benefit of the Doubt’ Composite Indicators , 2007 .

[22]  B. Golany,et al.  Alternate methods of treating factor weights in DEA , 1993 .

[23]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Handbook on data envelopment analysis , 2011 .

[24]  K. Tone,et al.  Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach , 2010 .