Comparison of the high-latitude ionospheric electrodynamics inferred from global simulations and semiempirical models for the January 1992 GEM campaign

The global characteristics of the auroral oval during the Geospace Environment Modeling (GEM) campaign of January 1992 are investigated through four different models: the assimilative mapping of ionospheric electrodynamics (AMIE) technique, the IZMIRAN electrodynamic model (IZMEM), the Weimer ionospheric convection model, and three-dimensional global fluid simulations. It is shown that all four models predict essentially the same key features with respect to the position, shape, and extent of the auroral convection cells, including the position of the separatrix between open and closed field lines. The relative change in the magnitude of the cross-polar cap potential is about the same for the different models, being between 20% and 50% in the case studies examined. However, there is some discrepancy by a factor of about 2 in predicting the absolute value. The global simulation potential is highest because it includes convection at low to middle latitudes, which appears to add about 50 kV to the total potential. It is shown that the auroral field-aligned currents are very sensitive to changes in Bz interplanetary magnetic field, with changes of the order of 200–300% in the total integrated current being inferred for the above changes in potential. The increase, particularly for the highest activity period, is due to an increase in the area of the oval rather than an increase in intensity.

[1]  Arthur D. Richmond,et al.  Mapping electrodynamic features of the high-latitude ionosphere from localized observations: technique , 1988 .

[2]  R. Lin,et al.  Flux rope structures in the magnetotail: Comparison between Wind/Geotail observations and global simulations , 1998 .

[3]  T. Potemra,et al.  Large‐scale characteristics of field‐aligned currents associated with substorms , 1978 .

[4]  R. D. Richtmyer,et al.  Difference methods for initial-value problems , 1959 .

[5]  T. Potemra,et al.  SOURCES OF LARGE-SCALE BIRKELAND CURRENTS , 1994 .

[6]  N. A. Krall,et al.  Principles of Plasma Physics , 1973 .

[7]  Y. Feldstein,et al.  Electric potential patterns in the northern and southern polar regions parameterized by the interplanetary magnetic field , 1994 .

[8]  S. Zalesak.  Introduction to “Flux-Corrected Transport. I. SHASTA, A Fluid Transport Algorithm That Works” , 1997 .

[9]  T. Sanderson,et al.  IMF induced changes to the nightside magnetotail: A comparison between WIND/Geotail/IMP 8 observations and modeling , 1997 .

[10]  T. Potemra,et al.  The amplitude distribution of field-aligned currents at northern high latitudes observed by TRIAD. Interim report , 1975 .

[11]  R. Winglee.  Non-MHD influences on the magnetospheric current system , 1994 .

[12]  D. Weimer,et al.  Models of high‐latitude electric potentials derived with a least error fit of spherical harmonic coefficients , 1995 .

[13]  Dongsu Ryu,et al.  Numerical magnetohydrodynamics in astrophysics: Algorithm and tests for multidimensional flow , 1995 .

[14]  R. J. Morris,et al.  Characteristics of ionospheric convection and field‐aligned current in the dayside cusp region , 1995 .

[15]  J. Lyon,et al.  Global numerical simulation of the growth phase and the expansion onset for a substorm observed by Viking , 1995 .

[16]  L. Lyons,et al.  Synoptic maps of polar caps for stable interplanetary magnetic field intervals during January 1992 geospace environment modeling campaign , 1996 .

[17]  D. Weimer,et al.  A flexible, IMF dependent model of high-latitude electric potentials having “Space Weather” applications , 1996 .

[18]  C. Clauer,et al.  Relationship between the observed and modeled modulation of the dayside ionospheric convection by the IMF By component , 1995 .