Application of the in-situ stress testing technology for the design of operating pressure of underground gas storage reservoir

The appropriate design of the operating pressure of underground gas storages (UGSs) is of great significance to their safe and profitable operation. In situ stress is basic data for determining the upper limit pressure of UGSs, analyzing fault stability in reservoir areas, and evaluating trap tightness. Generally, the design of the upper limit gas injection pressure of UGSs is a comprehensive geomechanical problem. After research and comparison of measurement methods, it is believed that the measurement of in situ stress induced by hydraulic fracturing can accurately obtain the in situ stress value near the wellbore, and having knowledge about the reservoir stress path will considerably decrease the risk of reservoir and cap rock instability during gas injection and production. Taking Well C1, an oil reservoir-type UGS in Block M, eastern China as an example, this paper introduces the use of hydraulic fracturing (HF) in situ stress testing technology to obtain the minimum principal stress values of the caprock, reservoir and floor intervals of Well C1. The measured minimum principal stress of the caprock is 32.8–36.8 MPa. Because it is an old well, the minimum principal stress of the reservoir is 33.7–34.2 MPa after correction of the in situ stress measurement according to the theory of elasticity. Based on the comprehensive analysis of the measured in situ stress data, it is believed that the safe upper limit of the reservoir-type gas storage in Block M is 27.2 MPa.

[1]  Zhide Wu,et al.  Experimental study on dynamic sealing capacity and safe threshold of caprock in underground gas storages , 2022, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering.

[2]  B. Sedaee,et al.  Mechanistic simulation of cushion gas and working gas mixing during underground natural gas storage , 2022, Journal of Energy Storage.

[3]  Tianfu Xu,et al.  China actively promotes CO2 capture, utilization and storage research to achieve carbon peak and carbon neutrality , 2021, Advances in Geo-Energy Research.

[4]  Z. Wang,et al.  Hysteresis effect of three-phase fluids in the high-intensity injection–production process of sandstone underground gas storages , 2021, Energy.

[5]  Doaa Saleh Mahdi,et al.  Hydrogen underground storage efficiency in a heterogeneous sandstone reservoir , 2021, Advances in Geo-Energy Research.

[6]  H. Huber,et al.  Underground gas storage as a promising natural methane bioreactor and reservoir? , 2021, Journal of Energy Storage.

[7]  Bin Xu,et al.  Probabilistic-based geomechanical assessment of maximum operating pressure for an underground gas storage reservoir, NW China , 2021, Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment.

[8]  D. Soeder Greenhouse gas sources and mitigation strategies from a geosciences perspective , 2021, Advances in Geo-Energy Research.

[9]  D. Zivar,et al.  Coupled hydro-mechanical analysis of underground gas storage at Sarajeh field, Qom formation, Iran , 2021 .

[10]  Ying He,et al.  Spontaneous imbibition in tight porous media with different wettability: Pore-scale simulation , 2021 .

[11]  Wang Xianglong,et al.  Influences of hydraulic fracturing on microfractures of high-rank coal under different in-situ stress conditions , 2020 .

[12]  J. Rutqvist,et al.  Influence of hysteretic stress path behavior on seal integrity during gas storage operation in a depleted reservoir , 2020 .

[13]  J. Esterle,et al.  Subsurface fractures, in-situ stress and permeability variations in the Walloon Coal Measures, eastern Surat Basin, Queensland, Australia , 2020 .

[14]  C. Spiers,et al.  Inelastic Deformation of the Slochteren Sandstone: Stress‐Strain Relations and Implications for Induced Seismicity in the Groningen Gas Field , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[15]  A. Mace,et al.  Long-Term Viability of Underground Natural Gas Storage in California: An Independent Review of Scientific and Technical Information , 2018 .

[16]  Ruyue Wang,et al.  3D geomechanical modeling and numerical simulation of in-situ stress fields in shale reservoirs: A case study of the lower Cambrian Niutitang formation in the Cen'gong block, South China , 2017 .

[17]  K. Goshtasbi,et al.  Mechanism of fracture initiation and propagation using a tri-axial hydraulic fracturing test system in naturally fractured reservoirs , 2016 .

[18]  T. Fujii,et al.  Experimental study of sealing performance: Effects of particle size and particle‐packing state on threshold pressure of sintered compacts , 2014 .

[19]  Zhijun Jin,et al.  Models for dynamic evaluation of mudstone/shale cap rocks and their applications in the Lower Paleozoic sequences, Sichuan Basin, SW China , 2014 .

[20]  Eric Tenthorey,et al.  Modelling the geomechanics of gas storage: A case study from the Iona gas field, Australia , 2013 .

[21]  Doug Angus,et al.  Investigating Stress Path Hysteresis in a CO2 Injection Scenario Using Coupled Geomechanical-fluid Flow Modelling☆ , 2013 .

[22]  D. Schmitt,et al.  Crustal stress determination from boreholes and rock cores: Fundamental principles , 2012 .

[23]  J. Xiong,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Gas Leakage in Bedded Salt Rock Storage Cavern , 2011 .

[24]  Robert David Barree,et al.  Holistic Fracture Diagnostics: Consistent Interpretation of Prefrac Injection Tests Using Multiple Analysis Methods , 2009 .

[25]  Emmanuel M Detournay,et al.  Damage around a cylindrical opening in a brittle rock mass , 2004 .

[26]  M. Zoback,et al.  Determination of stress orientation and magnitude in deep wells , 2003 .

[27]  F. Cornet,et al.  ISRM Suggested Methods for rock stress estimation; Part 3, Hydraulic fracturing (HF) and/ or hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures (HTPF) , 2003 .

[28]  S. Papson,et al.  “Model” , 1981 .