Language and gender in Congressional speech

This study draws from a large corpus of Congressional speeches from the 101st to the 110th Congress (1989–2008), to examine gender differences in language use in a setting of political debates. Female legislators’ speeches demonstrated characteristics of both a feminine language style (e.g. more use of emotion words, fewer articles) and a masculine one (e.g. more nouns and long words, fewer personal pronouns). A trend analysis found that these gender differences have consistently existed in the Congressional speeches over the past 20 years, regardless of the topic of debate. The findings lend support to the argument that gender differences in language use persist in professional settings like the floor of Congress.

[1]  John Nerbonne,et al.  The Secret Life of Pronouns. What Our Words Say About Us , 2014, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[2]  Bei Yu,et al.  The emotional world of health online communities , 2011, iConference.

[3]  Joanna Pawelczyk Gendered discourse in the professional workplace . Louise Mullany. Basingstoke, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. 2007. pp. 236. , 2009 .

[4]  Jane Sunderland,et al.  Gender and language research methodologies. , 2008 .

[5]  Stefan Kaufmann,et al.  Classifying Party Affiliation from Political Speech , 2008 .

[6]  A. Hultgren Reconstructing the sex dichotomy in language and gender research: some advantages of using correlational sociolinguistics , 2008 .

[7]  Bei Yu,et al.  Exploring the characteristics of opinion expressions for political opinion classification , 2008, DG.O.

[8]  Carla J. Groom,et al.  Gender Differences in Language Use: An Analysis of 14,000 Text Samples , 2008 .

[9]  Philip J. Stone,et al.  The general inquirer: A computer system for content analysis and retrieval based on the sentence as a unit of information , 2007 .

[10]  John C. Paolillo,et al.  Gender and genre variation in weblogs , 2006 .

[11]  Carol Waseleski Gender and the Use of Exclamation Points in Computer-Mediated Communication: An Analysis of Exclamations Posted to Two Electronic Discussion Lists , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[12]  D. Tillery The Plain Style in the Seventeenth Century: Gender and the History of Scientific Discourse , 2005 .

[13]  S. Herring,et al.  Assessing Gender Authenticity in Computer-Mediated Language Use , 2004 .

[14]  Anna Janssen,et al.  The Relationship between Gender and Topic in Gender-Preferential Language Use , 2004 .

[15]  Shlomo Argamon,et al.  Automatically Categorizing Written Texts by Author Gender , 2002, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[16]  Susan Conrad,et al.  Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use , 1998 .

[17]  S. Murray You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation , 1992 .

[18]  C. West,et al.  Not Just `Doctors' Orders': Directive-Response Sequences in Patients' Visits to Women and Men Physicians , 1990 .

[19]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[20]  Drude Dahlerup,et al.  From a Small to a Large Minority Women in Scandinavian Politics , 1988 .

[21]  Karen Berger Morello The Invisible Bar: The Woman Lawyer in America, 1638 to the Present , 1986 .

[22]  J. Hearn,et al.  Women, Men, and Leadership: A Critical Review of Assumptions, Practices, and Change in the Industrialized Nations , 1986 .

[23]  C. W. Hughes Emotion: Theory, Research and Experience , 1982 .

[24]  R. Lakoff Language and woman's place , 1973, Language in Society.

[25]  R. Birdwhistell Kinesics and Context: Essays on Body Motion Communication , 1971 .

[26]  Janis L. Edwards Gender and political communication in America : rhetoric, representation, and display , 2009 .

[27]  Louise Mullany,et al.  Gendered discourse in the professional workplace , 2007 .

[28]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Gender and the Culture of Computing in Applied IT Education , 2006 .

[29]  J. Holmes Gendered Talk At Work , 2006 .

[30]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Encyclopedia of Gender And Information Technology , 2006 .

[31]  R. Wodak Multiple Identities: The Roles of Female Parliamentarians in the EU Parliament , 2003 .

[32]  Don H. Zimmerman,et al.  Identity, context and interaction. , 1998 .

[33]  B. Bogoch Gendered Lawyering: Difference and Dominance in Lawyer-Client Interaction , 1997 .

[34]  M. Wood Language: Contexts and Consequences. , 1993 .

[35]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Gender and Participation in Computer-Mediated Linguistic Discourse. , 1992 .

[36]  Donald L. Rubin,et al.  Gender-Typical Style in Written Language. , 1992 .

[37]  D. Tannen You just don't understand: women and men in conversation. morrow , 1990 .

[38]  Cynthia Whissell,et al.  THE DICTIONARY OF AFFECT IN LANGUAGE , 1989 .

[39]  K. Campbell A critical study of early feminist rhetoric , 1989 .

[40]  J. Lorber Women Physicians: Careers, Status and Power , 1984 .

[41]  James S. Simkin Kinesics and Context: Essays on Body Motion Communication , 1972 .

[42]  C. Morris II. Language and Social Behavior , 1946 .

[43]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .