Neural network-based adaptive noise cancellation for enhancement of speech auditory brainstem responses

The measurement of the speech-evoked auditory brainstem response (speech ABR) is a promising technique for evaluating auditory function. However, the speech ABR is severely contaminated by background noise related to other brain electrical activity. The most commonly used method to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the response is coherent averaging, while recently adaptive filtering has also been reported. All of the applied methods are based on linear operations, but since the assumption of linearity may not be valid for neural activity, linear methods may not be adequate. In this paper, we present a new nonlinear adaptive noise cancellation (ANC) based on a multilayer perceptron neural network to enhance the speech ABR and compare its performance with a linear ANC algorithm based on least mean squares adaptive filtering. The effectiveness of the methods is tested using speech ABR data and is based on two different types of SNR measures, the local SNR at the fundamental frequency of the response and the overall SNR. The results show that the nonlinear neural network-based ANC can reduce the required recording time and performs better than the linear ANC especially when the SNR of the recorded speech ABR is low.

[1]  Y Zeng,et al.  Visual evoked potential estimation by adaptive noise cancellation with neural-network-based fuzzy inference system , 2007, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[2]  J. Nazuno Haykin, Simon. Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation, Prentice Hall, Inc. Segunda Edición, 1999 , 2000 .

[3]  A.K. Ziarani,et al.  A new adaptive technique of estimation of steady state auditory evoked potentials , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  C. Stam,et al.  Nonlinear dynamical analysis of EEG and MEG: Review of an emerging field , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  Hecht-Nielsen Theory of the backpropagation neural network , 1989 .

[6]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Improving Auditory Steady-State Response Detection Using Independent Component Analysis on Multichannel EEG Data , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  W J Tompkins,et al.  Applications of artificial neural networks for ECG signal detection and classification. , 1993, Journal of electrocardiology.

[8]  H. R. Dajani,et al.  Objective measurement of physiological signal-to-noise gain in the brainstem response to a synthetic vowel , 2013, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  Madhu S. Nair,et al.  Predictive-based adaptive switching median filter for impulse noise removal using neural network-based noise detector , 2013, Signal Image Video Process..

[10]  Hilmi R. Dajani,et al.  Recording human evoked potentials that follow the pitch contour of a natural vowel , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Abdulhamit Subasi,et al.  Classification of EEG signals using neural network and logistic regression , 2005, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[12]  Shiva Gholami-Boroujeny,et al.  Active noise control using an adaptive bacterial foraging optimization algorithm , 2014, Signal Image Video Process..

[13]  M. L. Dewal,et al.  Epileptic seizures detection in EEG using DWT-based ApEn and artificial neural network , 2012, Signal, Image and Video Processing.

[14]  Kathy R Vander Werff,et al.  Brain Stem Responses to Speech in Younger and Older Adults , 2011, Ear and hearing.

[15]  G. Camps,et al.  Fetal ECG extraction using an FIR neural network , 2001, Computers in Cardiology 2001. Vol.28 (Cat. No.01CH37287).

[16]  Mehdi Chehel Amirani,et al.  EEG signal analysis using spectral correlation function & GARCH model , 2015, Signal Image Video Process..

[17]  Terence W. Picton,et al.  Envelope and spectral frequency-following responses to vowel sounds , 2008, Hearing Research.

[18]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  Removal of ocular artifacts from EEG using an efficient neural network based adaptive filtering technique , 1999, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[19]  Fakhita Regragui,et al.  Visual Evoked Potentials' Non Linear Adaptive Filtering Based on Three Layers Perceptron , 2010 .

[20]  Bernard Widrow,et al.  Adaptive Signal Processing , 1985 .

[21]  J R Boston,et al.  Brainstem auditory-evoked potentials. , 1985, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[22]  Fallatah Anwar Enhancement of Speech Auditory Brainstem Responses Using Adaptive Filters , 2012 .

[23]  S. Haykin,et al.  Adaptive Filter Theory , 1986 .

[24]  Martti Juhola,et al.  Latency estimation of auditory brainstem response by neural networks , 1997, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[25]  Nina Kraus,et al.  Brainstem responses to speech syllables , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  André M Marcoux,et al.  Brainstem Auditory Responses to Resolved and Unresolved Harmonics of a Synthetic Vowel in Quiet and Noise , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[27]  Kaushik Majumdar,et al.  Human scalp EEG processing: Various soft computing approaches , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[28]  B. Widrow,et al.  Adaptive noise cancelling: Principles and applications , 1975 .

[29]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[30]  L. A. Cheah,et al.  Real-time detection of auditory steady-state responses , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[31]  Nina Kraus,et al.  Brain Stem Response to Speech: A Biological Marker of Auditory Processing , 2005, Ear and hearing.