Facilitators and Barriers to the Use of Outcome Measures by Certified Lymphedema Therapists

Background: Various outcome measures (OMs) have been used with individuals with breast cancer–related lymphedema (BCRL). There have not been studies investigating the facilitators and barriers to the use of OMs by certified lymphedema therapists (CLTs) on BCRL. The purposes of this study was to (1) identify facilitators and barriers for use of OMs reported by CLTs and (2) investigate the association of personal and professional characteristics of CLTs and their knowledge or beliefs about OMs. Methods: Cross-sectional online survey research design. Electronic surveys were distributed to CLTs from various institutions. Data from 70 physical therapists and 41 occupational therapists were analyzed. Point-biserial correlations examined associations and logistic regression examined predictors to OMs facilitators and barriers. Results: Certified lymphedema therapists agreed that OMs help direct a plan of care (90.1%), improve quality of care (76.6%), and determine the efficacy of their intervention on BCRL (72.7%). Certified lymphedema therapists reported difficulty knowing the best OM to choose due to numerous options (67.3%). Barriers for OMs included lack of knowledge and time, availability in workplace, and personal preferences. Characteristics associated with barriers and facilitators were few and poorly correlated. Conclusion: Certified lymphedema therapists agree on the benefits of and to the use of OMs, however, physical therapist CLTs may value the use of OMs less than occupational therapists. Certified lymphedema therapists experience barriers to use of OMs related to lack of knowledge and implementation skills. Further guidance is needed in selecting OMs for breast cancer survivors with BCRL to reduce barriers to their use.

[1]  Thierry Keller,et al.  Consensus-Based Core Set of Outcome Measures for Clinical Motor Rehabilitation After Stroke—A Delphi Study , 2020, Frontiers in Neurology.

[2]  Juliette K Cruijsberg,et al.  Which Factors Influence the Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Dutch Physiotherapy Practice? A Cross-Sectional Study. , 2020, Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada.

[3]  J. Yoo,et al.  Clinical nurses’ beliefs, knowledge, organizational readiness and level of implementation of evidence-based practice: The first step to creating an evidence-based practice culture , 2019, PloS one.

[4]  L. Eberman,et al.  The Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Secondary School Athletic Trainers' Perceptions, Practices, and Barriers. , 2019, Journal of athletic training.

[5]  M. Levin,et al.  Facilitators and barriers to using neurological outcome measures in developed and developing countries , 2018, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[6]  C. Grüneberg,et al.  Current use of measurement instruments by physiotherapists working in Germany: a cross-sectional online survey , 2018, BMC Health Services Research.

[7]  E. Al-Eisa,et al.  Implementation and use of standardized outcome measures by physical therapists in Saudi Arabia: barriers, facilitators and perceptions , 2017, BMC Health Services Research.

[8]  R. Damstra,et al.  The Dutch lymphedema guidelines based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health and the chronic care model. , 2017, Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders.

[9]  L. Gilchrist,et al.  Diagnosis of Upper-Quadrant Lymphedema Secondary to Cancer: Clinical Practice Guideline From the Oncology Section of APTA , 2017, Rehabilitation oncology.

[10]  Angus G K McNair,et al.  The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 , 2017, Trials.

[11]  Marie Elf,et al.  The case of value-based healthcare for people living with complex long-term conditions , 2017, BMC Health Services Research.

[12]  Heon-Jae Jeong,et al.  The level of collapse we are allowed: Comparison of different response scales in Safety Attitudes Questionnaire , 2016 .

[13]  J. Cruz,et al.  Evidence-Based Practice Beliefs and Implementation among the Nursing Bridge Program Students of a Saudi University. , 2016, International journal of health sciences.

[14]  M. Fisher,et al.  Breast Cancer Rehabilitation: Clinical Examination and Outcomes Assessment , 2015 .

[15]  A. R. Valier,et al.  Benefits of and barriers to using patient-rated outcome measures in athletic training. , 2014, Journal of athletic training.

[16]  J. Macdermid,et al.  Hand therapist use of patient report outcome (PRO) in practice: a survey study. , 2014, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[17]  K. Stokke,et al.  Evidence based practice beliefs and implementation among nurses: a cross-sectional study , 2014, BMC Nursing.

[18]  K. Kuo,et al.  Implementation of evidence-based practice across medical, nursing, pharmacological and allied healthcare professionals: a questionnaire survey in nationwide hospital settings , 2013, Implementation Science.

[19]  A. McGovern,et al.  Staff perceptions of using outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation , 2013, Disability and rehabilitation.

[20]  E. Duncan,et al.  The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review , 2012, BMC Health Services Research.

[21]  G. Fulk,et al.  Measures of evidence in evidence-based practice. , 2011, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[22]  A. Beurskens,et al.  Implementation of Measurement Instruments in Physical Therapist Practice: Development of a Tailored Strategy , 2010, Physical Therapy.

[23]  T. Stapleton,et al.  Use of Standardised Assessments and Outcome Measures among a Sample of Irish Occupational Therapists Working with Adults with Physical Disabilities , 2009 .

[24]  D. Jette,et al.  Use of Standardized Outcome Measures in Physical Therapist Practice: Perceptions and Applications , 2009, Physical Therapy.

[25]  D. Jette,et al.  Evidence-based practice: beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of physical therapists. , 2003, Physical therapy.

[26]  D. Wade,et al.  Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: a systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. , 2000, Stroke.

[27]  R. Chesson,et al.  Outcome Measures Used in Therapy Departments in Scotland , 1996 .