CT scan as a radiologic data base for optimum implant orientation.

There are many factors directly related to the longevity of implant osseointegration. Overload has been considered an etiologic factor in implant failure after a prosthesis has been constructed. Optimum implant orientation can be aided by the three-dimensional radiographic data base provided by a CT scan. The reformatted sectional images, when related to each other, facilitate a thorough visualization of the bone topography, sinus and nerve location, and bone density. The fundamentals of the CT imaging and the interrelationship of the cross-sectional, panoramic, and three-dimensional reformatted images are described.

[1]  P. Branemark,et al.  Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery. Supplementum.

[2]  P I Brånemark,et al.  A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. , 1981, International journal of oral surgery.

[3]  J Lindström,et al.  Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. , 1969, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  M R Rieger,et al.  Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants. , 1990, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  R. Jaffin,et al.  The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. , 1991, Journal of periodontology.

[6]  B. Langer,et al.  Osseointegration: its impact on the interrelationship of periodontics and restorative dentistry: Part I. , 1989, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[7]  R Skalak,et al.  Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. , 1983, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  H. Hahn,et al.  Preliminary evaluation of porous metal surfaced titanium for orthopedic implants. , 1970, Journal of biomedical materials research.