The actual and potential impacts of the CEFR on language education in Japan

This paper examines how the CEFR has been applied in language education in Japan demonstrating positive impacts as well as difficulties and potential problems. It can be said that the CEFR has had much influence and we deal with the three main applications: for score translation, to improve foreign language education in Japan (pedagogical use of CEFR), and the establishment of Japan standards of foreign language proficiency. In the first case there are several ongoing developments how can do descriptors are also used for the score interpretation of high-stake tests. The CEFR and in particular can do descriptors are used as assessment, goal-setting and reflective tools to develop and plan curricula and courses. A number of research projects have been conducted to further produce language proficiency standards in Japan using the CEFR as a reference point. This leads to one of the more serious issues regarding the implementation in the Japanese and other contexts: it could be the case that the more it is adapted to a specific context, the greater the possibility that the CEFR will lose its validity and the original language proficiency scales will be altered in an unhelpful way.

[1]  Phil Benson,et al.  Conceptions of Language and Language Learning. , 1999 .

[2]  B. Zimmerman Goal Setting: A Key Proactive Source of Academic Self-Regulation , 2012 .

[3]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[4]  神保 尚武,et al.  A comprehensive study on the framework of English language teachers' professional development in Japan , 2013 .

[5]  Michael Byram,et al.  An overview of the international influences of the CEFR. , 2010 .

[6]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[7]  D. Dunn,et al.  Experiential Learning , 2019, High Impact Teaching for Sport and Exercise Psychology Educators.

[8]  Carl Falsgraf The ecology of assessment , 2008, Language Teaching.

[9]  David Little The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Content, purpose, origin, reception and impact , 2006, Language Teaching.

[10]  吉島 茂,et al.  文化と言語の多様性の中のCommon European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment (CEFR)--それは基準か? (第10回明海大学大学院応用言語学研究科セミナー 講演) , 2008 .

[11]  M. Boekaerts,et al.  How Far Have We Moved Toward the Integration of Theory and Practice in Self-Regulation? , 2006 .

[12]  N. Purdie,et al.  Student conceptions of learning and their use of self-regulated learning strategies : a cross-cultural comparison. , 1996 .

[13]  Donald E. Powers,et al.  THE REDESIGNED TOEIC® (LISTENING AND READING) TEST: RELATIONS TO TEST‐TAKER PERCEPTIONS OF PROFICIENCY IN ENGLISH , 2008 .