Language Structure Is Partly Determined by Social Structure

Background Languages differ greatly both in their syntactic and morphological systems and in the social environments in which they exist. We challenge the view that language grammars are unrelated to social environments in which they are learned and used. Methodology/Principal Findings We conducted a statistical analysis of >2,000 languages using a combination of demographic sources and the World Atlas of Language Structures— a database of structural language properties. We found strong relationships between linguistic factors related to morphological complexity, and demographic/socio-historical factors such as the number of language users, geographic spread, and degree of language contact. The analyses suggest that languages spoken by large groups have simpler inflectional morphology than languages spoken by smaller groups as measured on a variety of factors such as case systems and complexity of conjugations. Additionally, languages spoken by large groups are much more likely to use lexical strategies in place of inflectional morphology to encode evidentiality, negation, aspect, and possession. Our findings indicate that just as biological organisms are shaped by ecological niches, language structures appear to adapt to the environment (niche) in which they are being learned and used. As adults learn a language, features that are difficult for them to acquire, are less likely to be passed on to subsequent learners. Languages used for communication in large groups that include adult learners appear to have been subjected to such selection. Conversely, the morphological complexity common to languages used in small groups increases redundancy which may facilitate language learning by infants. Conclusions/Significance We hypothesize that language structures are subjected to different evolutionary pressures in different social environments. Just as biological organisms are shaped by ecological niches, language structures appear to adapt to the environment (niche) in which they are being learned and used. The proposed Linguistic Niche Hypothesis has implications for answering the broad question of why languages differ in the way they do and makes empirical predictions regarding language acquisition capacities of children versus adults.

[1]  Edward Sapir,et al.  LANGUAGE AND ENVIRONMENT1 , 1912 .

[2]  Ernst Cassirer,et al.  Review: An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture , 1960 .

[3]  Edward Sapir,et al.  Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech , 1955 .

[4]  William Bright The Karok Language , 1958 .

[5]  S. Potter,et al.  Universals of Language , 1966 .

[6]  W. Stolz Universals of Language. , 1968 .

[7]  E. Carpenter Language and Environment. , 1968 .

[8]  Wesley M. Jacobsen,et al.  Papers from the Parasession on the Lexicon, Chicago Linguistic Society, April 14-15, 1978 , 1978 .

[9]  D. Bickerton The roots of language , 2016 .

[10]  B. Ackerman The Understanding of Young Children and Adults of the Deictic Adequacy of Communications. , 1981 .

[11]  Peter Trudgill,et al.  On Dialect: Social and Geographical Perspectives. , 1983 .

[12]  J. Rissanen A UNIVERSAL PRIOR FOR INTEGERS AND ESTIMATION BY MINIMUM DESCRIPTION LENGTH , 1983 .

[13]  Joan L. Bybee Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form , 1985 .

[14]  Desmond C. Derbyshire,et al.  Handbook of Amazonian Languages , 1986 .

[15]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  A comparative typology of English and German: Unifying the contrasts , 1986 .

[16]  A. Hawkins. 1986. A Comparative Typology of English and German. Unifying the contrasts , 1987 .

[17]  Wolfgang U. Dressler,et al.  Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology , 1987 .

[18]  Wolfgang U. Dressler,et al.  I. Word formation as part of natural morphology , 1987 .

[19]  Terry Crowley,et al.  An introduction to historical linguistics , 1987 .

[20]  Ernst Håkon Jahr,et al.  Language Change: Contributions to the Study of its Causes , 1989 .

[21]  P. Trudgill Contact and isolation in linguistic change , 1989 .

[22]  Dialect tipology: phonological aspects , 1991 .

[23]  J. Nichols Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time , 1992 .

[24]  Revere D. Perkins Deixis, Grammar, and Culture , 1992 .

[25]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World , 1994 .

[26]  Rudi Keller,et al.  On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language , 1994 .

[27]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning Population Codes by Minimizing Description Length , 1993, Neural Computation.

[28]  Daniel Nettle,et al.  Language Diversity in West Africa: An Ecological Approach , 1996 .

[29]  W. Klein,et al.  The Basic Variety (or: Couldn't natural languages be much simpler?) , 1997 .

[30]  Daniel Nettle,et al.  Coevolution of Phonology and the Lexicon in Twelve Languages of West Africa , 1998, J. Quant. Linguistics.

[31]  J. Zwart The Minimalist Program , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[32]  Patrick Juola Measuring Linguistic Complexity: The Morphological Tier , 1998, J. Quant. Linguistics.

[33]  Daniel Nettle,et al.  Explaining Global Patterns of Language Diversity , 1998 .

[34]  D. Nettle Is the rate of linguistic change constant , 1999 .

[35]  C. Schneider Natural selection and speciation. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  J. McWhorter,et al.  The worlds simplest grammars are creole grammars , 2001 .

[37]  Peter Trudgill,et al.  Sociolinguistic Variation and Change , 2001 .

[38]  Kim M. Isaac What About Linguistic Diversity? , 2001, Language and Nationality.

[39]  J. McWhorter,et al.  What happened to English , 2002 .

[40]  R. Gray,et al.  Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin , 2003, Nature.

[41]  Östen Dahl,et al.  The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity , 2004 .

[42]  Bernd Heine,et al.  Language Contact and Grammatical Change , 2005 .

[43]  S. Levinson,et al.  Structural Phylogenetics and the Reconstruction of Ancient Language History , 2005, Science.

[44]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs , 2006 .

[45]  Carol R. Ember,et al.  Climate, Econiche, and Sexuality : Influences on Sonority in Language , 2007 .

[46]  Laurie Bauer,et al.  Phoneme inventory size and population size , 2007 .

[47]  A. Wray,et al.  The consequences of talking to strangers: Evolutionary corollaries of socio-cultural influences on linguistic form , 2007 .

[48]  John McWhorter,et al.  Language Interrupted: Signs of Non-Native Acquisition in Standard Language Grammars , 2007 .

[49]  Kirsten Abbot-Smith,et al.  German children's comprehension of word order and case marking in causative sentences. , 2008, Child development.

[50]  Christian Schulze,et al.  Do Language Change Rates Depend on Population Size? , 2007, Adv. Complex Syst..

[51]  DIALECT TYPOLOGY: PHONOLOGICAL ASPECTS , 2008 .

[52]  A. Weighall,et al.  The kindergarten path effect revisited: children's use of context in processing structural ambiguities. , 2008, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[53]  Geoffrey Sampson,et al.  Language complexity as an evolving variable , 2009 .

[54]  Ronald K. S. Macaulay,et al.  Warm Climates and Sonority Classes , 2009 .

[55]  Robert Forkel,et al.  The World Atlas of Language Structures Online , 2009 .

[56]  Johanna Nichols,et al.  Linguistic complexity : a comprehensive definition and survey , 2009 .

[57]  S. Levinson,et al.  The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. , 2009, The Behavioral and brain sciences.