GCS: A grammatical coding system for natural language data

This article presents a rationale and description of GCS, or Grammatical Coding System. GCS is a general-use grammatical coding system designed for research on the language of normal and language-impaired children or adults and is especially useful for studies in which a relatively large number of participants are involved. It implements recent theoretical developments in linguistics to characterize development and/or language disorder in children and adults. In addition to the coding system, a computerized method for reading coded transcripts and calculating relevant descriptive statistics is presented. A full coded transcription is included in the Appendix. A detailed GCS manual may be downloaded fromwww.psychonomic.org/archive.

[1]  Alon Lavie,et al.  Automatic parsing of parental verbal input , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[2]  William C. Ritchie,et al.  Handbook of Child Language Acquisition , 1998 .

[3]  L B Leonard,et al.  Functional categories in the grammars of children with specific language impairment. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[4]  Andrew Radford,et al.  句法学:最简方案导论 = Syntax : a minimalist introduction , 1997 .

[5]  G. Mathern,et al.  Spoken Language Outcomes after Hemispherectomy: Factoring in Etiology , 2001, Brain and Language.

[6]  Christophe Parisse,et al.  Automatic disambiguation of morphosyntax in spoken language corpora , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[7]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  Generative perspectives on language acquisition : empirical findings, theoretical considerations, and crosslinguistic comparisons , 1996 .

[8]  Alon Lavie,et al.  Automatic Parsing of Parent-Child Interactions , 2004 .

[9]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  The Child Language Data Exchange System: an update , 1990, Journal of Child Language.

[10]  Hagit Borer,et al.  Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages , 1984 .

[11]  S. Curtiss,et al.  Age and Etiology as Predictors of Language Outcome following Hemispherectomy , 1999, Developmental Neuroscience.

[12]  J. Macswan,et al.  Toward a New View of Low-Achieving Bilinguals: A Study of Linguistic Competence in Designated "Semilinguals" , 2000 .

[13]  Gert Webelhuth,et al.  Government and binding theory and the minimalist program : principles and parameters in syntactic theory , 1997 .

[14]  S. Curtiss,et al.  How normal is grammatical development in the right hemisphere following hemispherectomy? The root infinitive stage and beyond , 2003, Brain and Language.

[15]  Daniel Kempler,et al.  Language Changes in Dementia of the Alzheimer Type , 1995 .

[16]  Frederick J. Newmeyer,et al.  Grammatical Theory: Its Limits and Its Possibilities , 1983 .

[17]  Lynn Eubank,et al.  The Childes Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk (2nd ed.) . Brian MacWhinney. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1995. Pp. xii + 458. $35.00 cloth. , 1996, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[18]  C. Schelletter,et al.  Morphosyntactic Development in Bilingual Children , 1998 .

[19]  E. Yund,et al.  Attentional Inhibition or Paracontrast? , 1999, Brain and Cognition.

[20]  S. Curtiss,et al.  Syntactic development in children with hemispherectomy: The I-, D-, and C-systems , 2005, Brain and Language.

[21]  Asa Kasher,et al.  The Chomskyan Turn , 1993 .

[22]  D. Kempler,et al.  Syntactic preservation in Alzheimer's disease. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[23]  H. Vinters,et al.  Pediatric Rasmussen Encephalitis: Social Communication, Language, PET, and Pathology before and after Hemispherectomy , 1996, Brain and Cognition.

[24]  Suzanne Corkin,et al.  Semantic impairment and anomia in Alzheimer's disease , 1986, Brain and Language.

[25]  Carson T. Schütze The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology , 1998 .

[26]  J. Zwart The Minimalist Program , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[27]  Alon Lavie,et al.  Parsing the CHILDES Database: Methodology and Lessons Learned , 2001, IWPT.

[28]  Bruce Hayes,et al.  Linguistics: An Introduction to Linguistic Theory , 2001 .

[29]  Steven Abney,et al.  The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect , 1972 .

[30]  B. MacWhinney The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[31]  K. Wexler Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage , 1998 .

[32]  Nina Hyams,et al.  The Underspecification of Functional Categories in Early Grammar , 1996 .

[33]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Neurobiological Mechanisms of Language Acquisition , 1994 .

[34]  William Labov,et al.  Empirical Foundations of Linguistic Theory , 1975 .