Chemical Manufacturing and Refining Industry Legitimacy: Reflective Management, Trust, Precrisis Communication to Achieve Community Efficacy

Calls for emergency right-to-know in the 1980s, and, in the 1990s, risk management planning, motivated U.S. chemical manufacturing and refining industries to operationalize a three-pronged approach to risk minimization and communication: reflective management to increase legitimacy, operational safety programs to raise trust, and community engagement designed to facilitate citizens' emergency response efficacy. To assess these management, operational, and communication initiatives, communities (often through Local Emergency Planning Committees) monitored the impact of such programs. In 2012, the fourth phase of a quasi-longitudinal study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of operational change and community outreach in one bellwether community. This study focuses on legitimacy, trust, and response efficacy to suggest that an industry can earn legitimacy credits by raising its safety and environmental impact standards, by building trust via that change, and by communicating emergency response messages to near residents to raise their response efficacy. As part of its campaign to demonstrate its concern for community safety through research, planning, and implementation of safe operations and viable emergency response systems, this industry uses a simple narrative of risk/emergency response-shelter-in-place-communicated by a spokes-character: Wally Wise Guy.

[1]  B. Honig,et al.  A Process Model of Internal and External Legitimacy , 2013 .

[2]  Julie Bradshaw,et al.  Community Relationship Building: Local Leadership in the Risk Communication Infrastructure , 2002 .

[3]  Juliet Roper,et al.  Symmetrical Communication: Excellent Public Relations or a Strategy for Hegemony? , 2005 .

[4]  Michael J. Palenchar,et al.  Strategic risk communication: Adding value to society , 2007 .

[5]  Jean-Philippe Vergne Toward a New Measure of Organizational Legitimacy: Method, Validation, and Illustration , 2010 .

[6]  C. Bhattacharya,et al.  The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment , 2006 .

[7]  Teun Terpstra,et al.  Emotions, Trust, and Perceived Risk: Affective and Cognitive Routes to Flood Preparedness Behavior , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[8]  W. Botzen,et al.  You Have Been Framed! How Antecedents of Information Need Mediate the Effects of Risk Communication Messages , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[9]  Teun Terpstra,et al.  Perception and Communication of Flood Risks: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  W. Douglas,et al.  Tolerance for Potential Environmental Health Risks: The Influence of Knowledge, Benefits, Control, Involvement, and Uncertainty , 1992 .

[11]  Jan M. Gutteling,et al.  How to trust? The importance of self‐efficacy and social trust in public responses to industrial risks , 2009 .

[12]  M. Siegrist Longitudinal Studies on Risk Research , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[13]  M. Zimmerman,et al.  Beyond Survival: Achieving New Venture Growth by Building Legitimacy , 2002 .

[14]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Perception of risk: the influence of general trust, and general confidence , 2005 .

[15]  M. Allen,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective Public Health Campaigns , 2000, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[16]  Susanne Holmström,et al.  Niklas Luhmann: Contingency, risk, trust and reflection , 2007 .

[17]  K. Witte Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model , 1992 .

[18]  Robert Francesconi James Hunt, the Wilmington 10, and institutional legitimacy , 1982 .

[19]  Mark C. Suchman Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[20]  J. Sillince,et al.  The Constitution of Organizational Legitimacy: A Narrative Perspective , 2007 .

[21]  Henrik Merkelsen,et al.  The double‐edged sword of legitimacy in public relations , 2011 .

[22]  Philippe De Maeyer,et al.  The Informed Society: An Analysis of the Public's Information‐Seeking Behavior Regarding Coastal Flood Risks , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[23]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Credibility and trust in risk communication , 1991 .

[24]  S. Vandeyar,et al.  Embracing Diversity: The Case of EquityRes, a Student Residence at Urban University , 2016 .

[25]  Jaesub Lee,et al.  Crisis and Risk Approaches to Emergency Management Planning and Communication: The Role of Similarity and Sensitivity , 2009 .

[26]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986 .

[27]  R. Heath,et al.  Risk Communication: A Two-Community Analysis of Proximity, Dread, Trust, Involvement, Uncertainty, Openness/Accessibility, and Knowledge on Support/Opposition Toward Chemical Companies , 1998 .

[28]  R. Heath,et al.  Proactive Response to Citizen Risk Concerns: Increasing Citizens' Knowledge of Emergency Response Practices , 1996 .

[29]  Katherine A. McComas,et al.  Defining Moments in Risk Communication Research: 1996–2005 , 2006, Journal of health communication.

[30]  Michael J. Palenchar,et al.  Community Relations and Risk Communication: A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Emergency Response Messages , 2000 .

[31]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy , 1975 .

[32]  Robert L. Heath,et al.  Onward Into More Fog: Thoughts on Public Relations' Research Directions , 2006 .

[33]  Alex Bitektine,et al.  The “Macro” and the “Micro” of Legitimacy: Toward a Multilevel Theory of the Legitimacy Process , 2015 .

[34]  Keith Michael Hearit,et al.  “Mistakes were made”: Organizations, apologia, and crises of social legitimacy , 1995 .

[35]  Trust, Confidence, Procedural Fairness, Outcome Fairness, Moral Conviction, and the Acceptance of GM Field Experiments , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.