Validation of a prognostic multi‐gene signature in high‐risk neuroblastoma using the high throughput digital NanoString nCounter™ system

Microarray‐based molecular signatures have not been widely integrated into neuroblastoma diagnostic classification systems due to the complexities of the assay and requirement for high‐quality RNA. New digital technologies that accurately quantify gene expression using RNA isolated from formalin‐fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissues are now available. In this study, we describe the first use of a high‐throughput digital system to assay the expression of genes in an “ultra‐high risk” microarray classifier in FFPE high‐risk neuroblastoma tumors. Customized probes corresponding to the 42 genes in a published multi‐gene neuroblastoma signature were hybridized to RNA isolated from 107 FFPE high‐risk neuroblastoma samples using the NanoString nCounter™ Analysis System. For classification of each patient, the Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated between the standardized nCounter™ data and the molecular signature from the microarray data. We demonstrate that the nCounter™ 42‐gene panel sub‐stratified the high‐risk cohort into two subsets with statistically significantly different overall survival (p = 0.0027) and event‐free survival (p = 0.028). In contrast, none of the established prognostic risk markers (age, stage, tumor histology, MYCN status, and ploidy) were significantly associated with survival. We conclude that the nCounter™ System can reproducibly quantify expression levels of signature genes in FFPE tumor samples. Validation of this microarray signature in our high‐risk patient cohort using a completely different technology emphasizes the prognostic relevance of this classifier. Prospective studies testing the prognostic value of molecular signatures in high‐risk neuroblastoma patients using FFPE tumor samples and the nCounter™ System are warranted.

[1]  Antonio Ortega,et al.  Prognostic significance of gene expression profiles of metastatic neuroblastomas lacking MYCN gene amplification. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  R. Stallings,et al.  A 6-gene signature identifies four molecular subgroups of neuroblastoma , 2011, Cancer Cell International.

[3]  Qing-Rong Chen,et al.  Prediction of Clinical Outcome Using Gene Expression Profiling and Artificial Neural Networks for Patients with Neuroblastoma , 2004, Cancer Research.

[4]  R. Arceci The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Classification System: An INRG Task Force Report , 2009 .

[5]  K K Matthay,et al.  The International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (the Shimada system) , 1999, Cancer.

[6]  Scott L. Pomeroy,et al.  Rapid, reliable, and reproducible molecular sub-grouping of clinical medulloblastoma samples , 2011, Acta Neuropathologica.

[7]  Rakesh Nagarajan,et al.  High throughput digital quantification of mRNA abundance in primary human acute myeloid leukemia samples. , 2009, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[8]  J. Mora,et al.  A Three-Gene Expression Signature Model for Risk Stratification of Patients with Neuroblastoma , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[9]  A. Montag,et al.  Expression profiling of 519 kinase genes in matched malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor/plexiform neurofibroma samples is discriminatory and identifies mitotic regulators BUB1B, PBK and NEK2 as overexpressed with transformation , 2013, Modern Pathology.

[10]  W. Furman,et al.  Combined use of erythropoietin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor does not decrease blood transfusion requirements during induction therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  Meghana Kulkarni Digital multiplexed gene expression analysis using the NanoString nCounter system. , 2011, Current protocols in molecular biology.

[12]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[13]  John M Maris,et al.  Purged versus non-purged peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation for high-risk neuroblastoma (COG A3973): a randomised phase 3 trial. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[14]  Gudrun Schleiermacher,et al.  Accurate Outcome Prediction in Neuroblastoma across Independent Data Sets Using a Multigene Signature , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[15]  W. Gerald,et al.  Integrative genomics identifies distinct molecular classes of neuroblastoma and shows that multiple genes are targeted by regional alterations in DNA copy number. , 2006, Cancer research.

[16]  Afshin Mashadi-Hossein,et al.  Multiplexed measurements of gene signatures in different analytes using the Nanostring nCounter™ Assay System , 2009, BMC Research Notes.

[17]  J. Maris Recent advances in neuroblastoma. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  P. Houghton,et al.  Improved response in high-risk neuroblastoma with protracted topotecan administration using a pharmacokinetically guided dosing approach. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  P. Fernandez,et al.  Using Digital RNA Counting and Flow Cytometry to Compare mRNA with Protein Expression in Acute Leukemias , 2012, PloS one.

[20]  A. Rademaker,et al.  Treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma with triple-tandem high-dose therapy and stem-cell rescue: results of the Chicago Pilot II Study. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Roland Eils,et al.  Prognostic impact of gene expression-based classification for neuroblastoma. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  P. Houghton,et al.  A single-arm pilot phase II study of gefitinib and irinotecan in children with newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma , 2012, Investigational New Drugs.

[23]  Jennifer L. Osborn,et al.  Direct multiplexed measurement of gene expression with color-coded probe pairs , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[24]  K. Matthay,et al.  Long-term results for children with high-risk neuroblastoma treated on a randomized trial of myeloablative therapy followed by 13-cis-retinoic acid: a children's oncology group study. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  O. Yanuka,et al.  Involvement of Myc targets in c-myc and N-myc induced human tumors , 1998, Oncogene.

[26]  Roland Eils,et al.  Prediction of clinical outcome and biological characterization of neuroblastoma by expression profiling , 2004 .

[27]  J Pritchard,et al.  Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  K. Morik,et al.  Accurate prediction of neuroblastoma outcome based on miRNA expression profiles , 2010, International journal of cancer.

[29]  John D. Storey A direct approach to false discovery rates , 2002 .

[30]  Ruth Ladenstein,et al.  Predicting outcomes for children with neuroblastoma using a multigene-expression signature: a retrospective SIOPEN/COG/GPOH study. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.