Occupational injury mortality surveillance in the United States: an examination of census counts from two different surveillance systems, 1992-1997.

BACKGROUND The surveillance of occupational injury mortality in the United States has evolved over the last century. Currently there are two different data sources used for the study of occupational injury mortality. Each system varies in methodology, leading to different census counts. We provide an overview and analysis of similarities and differences in these two systems. METHODS The National Traumatic Occupational Fatalities (NTOF) surveillance system and the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI) were examined for civilian deaths at work in the United States from 1992 to 1997. RESULTS There were 31,643 occupational injury mortality cases according to NTOF and 37,023 from CFOI for civilian workers 16-years and older in the United States for the 6-year period of analysis. The annual average occupational injury mortality rates were 4.5 per 100,000 full time equivalent workers from NTOF and 5.2 from CFOI. The higher capture rate by CFOI was consistent across each of the 6 years. Similar patterns for demographics, industry, and occupation, and type of incident were seen for both systems. CONCLUSIONS While NTOF provides more years of data dating back to 1980, CFOI (established in 1992) provides a more comprehensive capture of occupational injury mortality and provides greater detail of the mortality incidents. The overall injury mortality patterns, however, appear to be similar between the systems.

[1]  R B Trent Locations of fatal work injuries in the United States: 1980 to 1985. , 1989, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[3]  J. Ruser,et al.  Denominator choice in the calculation of workplace fatality rates. , 1998, American journal of industrial medicine.

[4]  J. Meigs,et al.  Sinonasal cancer and occupation: a case-control study. , 1980, American journal of epidemiology.

[5]  H. Howe,et al.  Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries , 1996 .

[6]  D. West,et al.  Comparison of occupational interview data to death certificate data in Utah. , 1987, American journal of industrial medicine.

[7]  H. Davis The accuracy of industry data from death certificates for workplace homicide victims. , 1988, American journal of public health.

[8]  G S Sorock,et al.  Three perspectives on work-related injury surveillance systems. , 1997, American journal of industrial medicine.

[9]  G. Swanson,et al.  Comparison of death certificate occupation and industry data with lifetime occupational histories obtained by interview: variations in the accuracy of death certificate entries. , 1988, American journal of industrial medicine.

[10]  R. W. Burrows,et al.  An assessment of occupation and industry data from death certificates and hospital medical records for population-based cancer surveillance. , 1984, American journal of public health.

[11]  M. Schumacher Comparison of occupation and industry information from death certificates and interviews. , 1986, American journal of public health.

[12]  N Stout,et al.  Effectiveness of source documents for identifying fatal occupational injuries: a synthesis of studies. , 1991, American journal of public health.

[13]  S P Baker,et al.  Fatal occupational injuries. , 1982, JAMA.

[14]  Elyce A Biddle,et al.  Comparison of two fatal occupational injury surveillance systems in the United States. , 2002, Journal of safety research.

[15]  C. Conroy,et al.  Representativeness of deaths identified through the injury-at-work item on the death certificate: implications for surveillance. , 1991, American journal of public health.

[16]  Earl S. Pollack,et al.  Counting Injuries and Illnesses in the Workplace: Proposals for a Better System , 1987 .