The Effects of the Impact of Instructional Immediacy on Cognition and Learning in Online Classes

Current research has explored the impact of instructional immediacy, defined as those behaviors that help build close relationships or feelings of closeness, both on cognition and motivation in the traditional classroom and online classroom; however, online courses continue to suffer from higher dropout rates. Based on Albert Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory, four primary relationships or interactions in an online course will be explored in light of how they can provide immediacy thereby reducing student attrition and improving cognitive learning. The four relationships are teacher-student, student-student, and student-content, and studentcomputer. Results of a study conducted with inservice teachers completing a 14-week online professional development technology course will be examined to demonstrate immediacy strategies that improve cognitive learning and reduce student attrition. Results of the study reveal that students can be motivated through various interactions and instructional immediacy behaviors which lead to higher completion rates, improved self-efficacy, and cognitive learning. Keywords—Distance Learning, Self-Efficacy, Instructional immediacy, Student achievement.

[1]  John Keller,et al.  Learner motivation and E-learning design: A multinationally validated process , 2004 .

[2]  Richard W. Morshead.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Handbook II: Affective Domain , 1965 .

[3]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[4]  Wilhelmina C. Savenye,et al.  Applying Social Cognitive Constructs of Motivation To Enhance Student Success in Online Distance Education. , 2003 .

[5]  D. Krathwohl.  Taxonomy of educational objectives : tha classification of educational goals; handbook II: affective domain / by D.R. Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom and Bertram B. Masia , 1980 .

[6]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation , 2000 .

[7]  Charles D. Dziuban,et al.  Assessing Online Learning: What One University Learned about Student Success, Persistence, and Satisfaction , 2006 .

[8]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Growing by Degrees: Online Education in the United States, 2005. , 2005 .

[9]  Catherine L. Finnegan,et al.  Predicting Retention in Online General Education Courses , 2005 .

[10]  Robert H. Woods,et al.  Using Non-Subject-Matter-Specific Discussion Boards to Build Connectedness in Online Learning , 2003 .

[11]  Jack M. Wilson,et al.  A multimedia model for undergraduate education , 1996 .

[12]  D. Noble.  Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education , 1998 .

[13]  Colla J. MacDonald,et al.  Learners' Perspectives on what is Missing from Online Learning: Interpretations through the Community of Inquiry Framework , 2006 .

[14]  P. Whitten,et al.  Re‐thinking instructional immediacy for web courses: A social cognitive exploration , 2000 .

[15]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[16]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[17]  Clarice P. Gressard,et al.  Validation Studies of a New Computer Attitude Scale , 1986 .

[18]  Mike Allen,et al.  The Role of Teacher Immediacy as a Motivational Factor in Student Learning: Using Meta-Analysis to Test a Causal Model , 2006 .

[19]  J. Keller.  Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn , 1987 .

[20]  K. Krentler,et al.  Does Technology Enhance Actual Student Learning? The Case of Online Discussion Boards , 2005 .

[21]  Holly M. Hutchins.  Instructional Immediacy and the Seven Principles: Strategies for Facilitating Online Courses , 2003 .

[22]  P. Northrup.  Online Learners' Preferences for Interaction , 2002 .

[23]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[24]  Steven R. Aragon.  Creating Social Presence in Online Environments , 2003 .

[25]  Suzanne Young,et al.  Student Views of Effective Online Teaching in Higher Education , 2006 .

[26]  Mervyn J. Wighting,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Student Motivation in Traditional Classroom and E-Learning Courses , 2007 .

[27]  A. P. Rovai.  Building Sense of Community at a Distance , 2002, Distances et médiations des savoirs.