Study orchestrations in distance learning: Identifying dissonance and its implications for distance educators

The exploration of study orchestrations emphasises students’ active participation in learning, describing the ways in which they marshal the resources available to them in response to their learning environment. This study reports the identification of study orchestrations in a group of distance students and identifies the existence of dissonant study orchestrations, which previous research has linked with poor achievement, in approximately one-fifth of the group. Data came from responses by 176 students to the ASSIST questionnaire. The data was subject to factor analysis to ensure commensurability with previous studies, and then cluster analysis was used to identify groups with similar study orchestrations. Four clusters were identified. One of these was clearly dissonant, pointing toward problematic links between learning environments and student approaches to study. The implications of dissonant study orchestrations are explored and further research is suggested, along with implications for the practice of distance educators.

[1]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Promoting deep learning through teaching and assessment: conceptual frameworks and educational contexts. , 2000 .

[2]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[3]  Barbara J. Flood,et al.  Validation of the approaches and study skills inventory for students (assist) using accounting students in the USA and Ireland: a research note , 2004 .

[4]  Rebecca Walker,et al.  The impact of curriculum change on health sciences first year students’ approaches to learning , 2010 .

[5]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Researching Student Learning: Approaches to Studying in Campus-Based and Distance Education , 2000 .

[6]  Behiye Ubuz,et al.  Effects of the Asynchronous Web-Based Course: Preservice Teachers' Achievement, Metacognition, and Attitudes towards the Course , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[7]  F. Marton,et al.  On qualitative differences in learning , 2013 .

[8]  N. Entwistle,et al.  EFFECTS OF ACADEMIC DEPARTMENTS ON STUDENTS' APPROACHES TO STUDYING , 1981 .

[9]  David Kember,et al.  Approaches to Study of Distance Education Students , 1986 .

[10]  Kirsti Lonka,et al.  Individual Ways of Interacting with the Learning Environment--Are They Related to Study Success?. , 1998 .

[11]  F. Cano,et al.  The learning approaches and epistemological beliefs of university students: a cross‐sectional and longitudinal study , 2007 .

[12]  Jan H. F. Meyer.  The modelling of ‘dissonant’ study orchestration in higher education , 2000 .

[13]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Students' perceptions of academic quality and approaches to studying in distance education , 2005 .

[14]  Gina Wisker,et al.  Recognising and Overcoming Dissonance in Postgraduate Student Research , 2003 .

[15]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Mature Students in Higher Education: III. Approaches to studying in Access students , 1997 .

[16]  Velda McCune,et al.  The Conceptual Bases of Study Strategy Inventories , 2004 .

[17]  Elizabeth R. Peterson,et al.  Conceptions of Learning and Knowledge in Higher Education: Relationships with Study Behaviour and Influences of Learning Environments. , 2004 .

[18]  T Rice,et al.  Independent learning. , 1989, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[19]  P Evans,et al.  Can we influence medical students’ approaches to learning? , 2005, Medical teacher.

[20]  Velda McCune,et al.  Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts , 2000 .

[21]  J. H. F. Meyer,et al.  Study orchestration: the manifestation, interpretation and consequences of contextualised approaches to studying , 1991 .

[22]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Approaches to studying in distance education , 1999 .

[23]  Elizabeth Murphy.  A framework for identifying and promoting metacognitive knowledge and control in online discussants , 2009 .

[24]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Understanding Student Learning , 1983 .

[25]  T. Dunne,et al.  Individual study orchestrations and their association with learning outcome , 1990 .

[26]  Sari Lindblom-Yla¨Nne.  Broadening an Understanding of the Phenomenon of Dissonance , 2003 .

[27]  A. Cliff.  Dissonance in first-year students’ reflections on their learning , 2000 .

[28]  L. Dyas,et al.  Approaches to Learning: A study of first-year geography undergraduates , 2001 .

[29]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Mature students in higher education: I. A literature survey on approaches to studying , 1994 .

[30]  Jhf Meyer,et al.  Approaches to studying and course perceptions using the Lancaster inventory—A comparative study , 1989 .

[31]  Robert James Lyall,et al.  Influences on the Orientations to Learning of Distance Education Students in Australia , 2000 .

[32]  Joan Ballantine,et al.  Accounting and business students’ approaches to learning: A longitudinal study , 2008 .

[33]  Ros Carnwell,et al.  Approaches to Study and their Impact on the Need for Support and Guidance in Distance Learning , 2000 .

[34]  D. Kember,et al.  Does higher education promote independent learning? , 1990 .

[35]  Carolin Kreber,et al.  The Relationship between Students' Course Perception and their Approaches to Studying in Undergraduate Science Courses: A Canadian experience , 2003 .

[36]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Student failure: Disintegrated patterns of study strategies and perceptions of the learning environment , 1991 .

[37]  Sheila Tyler,et al.  The Relationship Between Learning Approaches to Part‐Time Study of Management Courses and Transfer of Learning to the Workplace , 2005 .

[38]  Nico Verloop,et al.  Dissonance in students’ regulation of learning processes , 2000 .

[39]  F. Cano,et al.  Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance. , 2005, The British journal of educational psychology.

[40]  William F. Long,et al.  Dissonance Detected by Cluster Analysis of Responses to the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students , 2003 .

[41]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning , 1999 .

[42]  J E Overall,et al.  Population recovery capabilities of 35 cluster analysis methods. , 1993, Journal of clinical psychology.

[43]  F. Cano,et al.  Approaches to learning and study orchestrations in high school students , 2007 .

[44]  Sarah Gielen,et al.  On the dynamics of students' approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment , 2006 .

[45]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[46]  R. Rimor,et al.  Instructor's Scaffolding in Support of Student's Metacognition through a Teacher Education Online Course ─ A Case Study , 2008 .

[47]  T. Dunne,et al.  Study orchestration and learning outcome: evidence of association over time among disadvantaged students , 1990 .