Computed tomography-based attenuation correction in neurological positron emission tomography: evaluation of the effect of the X-ray tube voltage on quantitative analysis

BackgroundThe advent of dual-modality positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging has revolutionized the practice of clinical oncology by improving lesion localization and facilitating treatment planning for radiation therapy. In addition, the use of CT images for CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC) allows the overall scanning time to be decreased and a noise-free attenuation map (μmap) to be created. The most common procedure requires a piecewise linear calibration curve acquired under standard imaging conditions to convert the patient's CT image from low effective CT energy into an attenuation map at 511 keV. AimTo evaluate the effect of the tube voltage on the accuracy of CTAC. MethodsAs different tube voltages are employed in current PET/CT scanning protocols, depending on the size of the patient and the region under study, the impact of using a single calibration curve on the accuracy of CTAC for images acquired at different tube voltages was investigated through quantitative analysis of the created μmaps, generated attenuation correction factors and reconstructed neurological PET data using anthropomorphic experimental phantom and clinical studies. ResultsFor CT images acquired at 80 and 140 kVp, average relative differences of −2.9% and 0.7%, respectively, from the images acquired at 120 kVp were observed for the absolute activity concentrations in five regions of the anthropomorphic striatal phantom when CT images were converted using a single calibration curve derived at 120 kVp. Likewise, average relative differences of 1.9% and −0.6% were observed when CT images were acquired at 120 kVp and CTAC used calibration curves derived at 80 and 140 kVp, respectively. ConclusionThe use of a single calibration curve acquired under standard imaging conditions does not affect, to a visible or measurable extent, neurological PET images reconstructed using CTAC when CT images are acquired in different conditions.

[1]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-guided attenuation and scatter corrections in three-dimensional brain positron emission tomography. , 2003, Medical physics.

[2]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  XCOM : Photon Cross Sections Database , 2005 .

[3]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Attenuation compensation in cerebral 3D PET: effect of the attenuation map on absolute and relative quantitation , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[4]  C. Snyderman,et al.  Head and neck malignancy: is PET/CT more accurate than PET or CT alone? , 2005, Radiology.

[5]  V. Rappoport,et al.  CT tube-voltage dependent attenuation correction scheme for PET/CT scanners , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[6]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  PET/CT scanners: a hardware approach to image fusion. , 2003, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[7]  G. Hutchins,et al.  Automated PET attenuation correction model for functional brain imaging. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  The use of X-ray CT for attenuation correction of PET data , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium - NSS'94.

[9]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners. , 2003, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[10]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Atlas-guided non-uniform attenuation correction in cerebral 3D PET imaging , 2005, NeuroImage.

[11]  Tung-Hsin Wu,et al.  Radiation exposure during transmission measurements: comparison between CT- and germanium-based techniques with a current PET scanner , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[12]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. , 1998, Medical physics.

[13]  Valerie Treyer,et al.  CT vs 68Ge attenuation correction in a combined PET/CT system: evaluation of the effect of lowering the CT tube current , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[14]  A. Buck,et al.  PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[15]  Chuanyong Bai,et al.  A generalized model for the conversion from CT numbers to linear attenuation coefficients , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[16]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Determination of the attenuation map in emission tomography. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  C. Stearns,et al.  Towards single ultra-low dose CT scan for both attenuation map creation and localization in PET-CT application , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[18]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Dual-Modality Imaging: More Than the Sum of its Components , 2006 .

[19]  Dimitris Visvikis,et al.  DETECT-dual energy transmission estimation CT-for improved attenuation correction in SPECT and PET , 1997 .

[20]  Z. Keidar,et al.  Positron emission tomography in the evaluation of lymphoma. , 2004, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[21]  A. Evans,et al.  Correction for partial volume effects in PET: principle and validation. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Assessment of errors caused by X-ray scatter and use of contrast medium when using CT-based attenuation correction in PET , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.