Abstract Problem Statement : It is not sufficient to simply decode word meaning to comprehend a reading text. To achieve comprehension in reading, an effective reader should be able to successfully implement such practices as relating the text with his or her own background knowledge, summarizing information, drawing conclusions, and posing questions at the text. Use of reading comprehension strategies facilitates a successful reading process. However, use of strategies may not always be sufficient for a successful reading process. There are other factors that increase student motivation. Allotting a certain amount of time to reading may be highly effective in increasing reading success. Purpose of the Study : This study aims to determine the relationship between use of reading comprehension strategies and daily free reading time among 4th and 5th grade primary education students. Method of the Study : Descriptive method was used to identify the situation. The study was conducted on 4th and 5th grade primary education students to examine the relationship between their use of reading comprehension strategies and daily time allotted to free reading. Sampling: The study was conducted on 402 (208 girls, 195 boys) students at 4th and 5th grades attending 7 primary education schools in Izmir/Buca. 51.7% of the participants were female and 48.3% were male. The sample was determined through stratified sampling method. Data Collection Instrument : In this study, a “Reading Comprehension Strategies Scale” (RCSS) was used to determine students’ level of use of reading strategies. The daily time that student spend free reading (stated in minutes as unit of time) was obtained through the personal information form of the scale. Data Analysis and Interpretation : As a result of the analyses, the use of reading comprehension strategies was found to be a significant predictor on daily time spent reading (R 2 =0.57, p=0.00). Based on this result, it can be stated that there is a significant positive relationship at a medium level between use of reading strategies and daily time spent reading.
[1]
Cor Aarnoutse,et al.
Relation between Reading Comprehension, Vocabulary, Reading Pleasure, and Reading Frequency.
,
1998
.
[2]
Danielle S. McNamara.
Reading comprehension strategies : theories, interventions, and technologies
,
2007
.
[3]
Catherine E. Snow,et al.
Rethinking reading comprehension
,
2003
.
[4]
S. Lenski,et al.
Reading success for struggling adolescent learners
,
2008
.
[5]
Benoît Dardenne,et al.
Metacognition: Cognitive and Social Dimensions
,
1998
.
[6]
Vincent Yzerbyt,et al.
From Social Cognition to Metacognition
,
1998
.
[7]
H. Van Keer,et al.
Effects of Explicit Reading Strategies Instruction and Peer Tutoring on Second and Fifth Graders' Reading Comprehension and Self-Efficacy Perceptions
,
2005
.
[8]
Vicki E. Snider.
Reading Comprehension Performance of Adolescents Withlearning Disabilities
,
1989
.
[9]
Salim Abu-Rabia,et al.
Attitudes and cultural background and their relationship to reading comprehension in a second language: a comparison of three different social contexts
,
1996
.
[10]
Cathy Collins Block,et al.
Comprehension Instruction: Research-Based Best Practices
,
2001
.
[11]
Carhy Collins Block,et al.
Comprehension Process Instruction: Creating Reading Success in Grades K-3
,
2004
.
[12]
Rick Wormeli,et al.
Summarization In Any Subject: 50 Techniques To Improve Student Learning
,
2004
.
[13]
Theodore L. Harris,et al.
The Literacy Dictionary: The Vocabulary of Reading and Writing
,
1995
.