Universities and Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (KIBS) as Sources of Knowledge for Innovative Firms in Peripheral Regions

Pinto H., Fernandez-Esquinas M. and Uyarra E. Universities and knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) as sources of knowledge for innovative firms in peripheral regions, Regional Studies. Knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) make a crucial contribution to regional innovation. Their relevance is potentially higher in peripheral territories, assisting small and medium-sized enterprises to access knowledge. Nevertheless, regions often concentrate research and development capabilities in the public sector, while highly specialized services provided by firms are scarce. Using data from 737 firms in Andalusia, Spain, this article connects the literatures of KIBS and university–industry interactions. This paper finds that absorptive capacity remains a central dimension in interactions with universities and the use of KIBS. Even if KIBS firms do not demonstrate higher propensities to interact with universities, the use of both channels is evidence of knowledge circulation between innovative firms and universities' advanced services.

[1]  J. Howells.  Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation , 2006 .

[2]  André Torre,et al.  Proximity and Localization , 2005 .

[3]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  The spatial profile of university-business research partnerships , 2010 .

[4]  Andrew von Nordenflycht.  What Is a Professional Service Firm? Toward a Theory and Taxonomy of Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 2010 .

[5]  B. Fischer,et al.  Technological Attraction of FDI flows in Knowledge-Intensive Services: a Regional Innovation System Perspective for Spain , 2011 .

[6]  Bruce Tether,et al.  Beyond industry–university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base , 2008 .

[7]  Francisco Mas-Verdú,et al.  Does only size matter in the use of knowledge intensive services? , 2008 .

[8]  Q. Vuong.  Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses , 1989 .

[9]  P. D'Este,et al.  The relationship between academic consulting and research performance: Evidence from five Spanish universities , 2014 .

[10]  Simone Strambach,et al.  The contribution of KIBS to innovation in cities: an evolutionary and institutional perspective , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[11]  Cristina Martinez-Fernandez,et al.  The Knowledge Economy at Work: Skills and Innovation in Knowledge Intensive Service Activities , 2011 .

[12]  M. Freel.  Knowledge-Intensive Business Services as Knowledge Mediators in Different Regional Contexts: The Case of Norway , 2016 .

[13]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[14]  M. Wright,et al.  Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications , 2007 .

[15]  D. Doloreux,et al.  Place, Space and Distance: Towards a Geography of Knowledge‐Intensive Business Services Innovation , 2009 .

[16]  A. Zenker,et al.  Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: the role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems , 2001 .

[17]  Markus Perkmann,et al.  Engaging the Scholar: Three Types of Academic Consulting and Their Impact on Universities and Industry , 2008 .

[18]  Pascale Roux,et al.  An analysis of science–industry collaborative patterns in a large European University , 2009 .

[19]  A. Salter,et al.  Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations , 2012 .

[20]  P. Hertog.  KNOWLEDGE-INTENSIVE BUSINESS SERVICES AS CO-PRODUCERS OF INNOVATION , 2000 .

[21]  Elvira Uyarra,et al.  Conceptualizing the Regional Roles of Universities, Implications and Contradictions , 2010 .

[22]  U. Schmoch,et al.  Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields , 1998 .

[23]  Universities and Regional Development , 2010 .

[24]  John R. Bryson,et al.  Regional Patterns of Small Firm Development in the Business Services: Evidence from the United Kingdom , 1993 .

[25]  F. Tödtling,et al.  One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach , 2005 .

[26]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Insights into services and innovation in the knowledge intensive economy , 2003 .

[27]  Emmanuel Muller,et al.  What we should know about knowledge-intensive business services , 2009 .

[28]  Jonathan Potter,et al.  Entrepreneurship, SMEs and Local Development in Andalusia, Spain , 2011 .

[29]  Peter R H Wood,et al.  Knowledge-intensive Services and Urban Innovativeness , 2002 .

[30]  A. Koch,et al.  Regional innovation systems and the foundation of knowledge intensive business services. A comparative study in Bremen, Munich, and Stuttgart, Germany , 2006 .

[31]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[32]  I. Miles,et al.  The Knowledge Economy at Work , 2011 .

[33]  A. Salter,et al.  Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? , 2004 .

[34]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Regression Analysis of Count Data , 1998 .

[35]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[36]  Marco Sabbadin.  Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D , 2016 .

[37]  M. Fischer,et al.  Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants , 2002 .

[38]  Manuel Fernández-Esquinas,et al.  Beneath the tip of the iceberg: exploring the multiple forms of university–industry linkages , 2011, Higher Education.

[39]  Denisa Mindruta,et al.  Value Creation in University-Firm Research Collaborations: A Matching Approach , 2008 .

[40]  Robert J. Bennett,et al.  SME Growth: The Relationship with Business Advice and External Collaboration , 2000 .

[41]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[42]  Davide Consoli,et al.  Variety in the Knowledge Base of Knowledge Intensive Business Services , 2010 .

[43]  A. Salter,et al.  Exploring the Effect of Geographical Proximity and University Quality on University–Industry Collaboration in the United Kingdom , 2011 .

[44]  Mercedes Rodríguez,et al.  How innovative are services? an empirical analysis for Spain , 2005 .

[45]  A. Chadwick,et al.  Employment Growth in Knowledge-Intensive Business Services in Great Britain during the 1990s — Variations at the Regional and Sub-Regional Level , 2008 .

[46]  M. Freel.  Knowledge-Intensive Business Services users and uses:exploring the propensity to innovation-related cooperation with Knowledge-Intensive Business Services , 2010 .

[47]  P. Hertog,et al.  Knowledge-intensive business services: users, carriers and sources of innovation , 1995 .

[48]  Heidi Wiig Aslesen,et al.  THE ROLE OF PROXIMITY AND KNOWLEDGE INTERACTION BETWEEN HEAD OFFICES AND KIBS , 2007 .

[49]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Regional Development in the Knowledge-Based Economy: The Construction of Advantage , 2006 .

[50]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Regression Analysis of Count Data , 1998 .

[51]  Namrata Malhotra,et al.  Heterogeneity in Professional Service Firms , 2009 .