Accumulating Errors in Tests of General Relativity with Gravitational Waves: Overlapping Signals and Inaccurate Waveforms

Observations of gravitational waves (GWs) from compact binary coalescences provide powerful tests of general relativity (GR), but systematic errors in data analysis could lead to incorrect scientific conclusions. This issue is especially serious in the third-generation GW detectors in which the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) is high and the number of detections is large. In this work, we investigate the impacts of overlapping signals and inaccurate waveform models on tests of GR. We simulate mock catalogs for Einstein Telescope and Cosmic Explorer and perform parametric tests of GR using waveform models with different levels of inaccuracy. We find that the systematic error in non-GR parameter estimates could accumulate toward a false deviation from GR when combining results from multiple events, although a Bayesian model selection analysis may not favor a deviation. Waveform inaccuracies contribute most to the systematic errors, but multiple overlapping signals could magnify the effects of systematics owing to the incorrect removal of signals. We also point out that testing GR using selected “golden binaries” with high S/N is even more vulnerable to false deviations from GR. The problem of error accumulation is universal; we emphasize that it must be addressed to fully exploit the data from third-generation GW detectors and that further investigations, particularly in waveform accuracy, will be essential.

[1]  C. Broeck,et al.  Parameter estimation methods for analyzing overlapping gravitational wave signals in the third-generation detector era , 2022, 2211.01304.

[2]  L. Lehner,et al.  New framework to study unmodeled physics from gravitational wave data , 2022, Physical Review D.

[3]  R. Cotesta,et al.  The impact of confusion noise on golden binary neutron-star events in next-generation terrestrial observatories , 2022, 2209.13452.

[4]  Marc Favata,et al.  Systematic bias on parametrized tests of general relativity due to neglect of orbital eccentricity , 2022, Physical Review D.

[5]  P. K. Panda,et al.  GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run , 2021, 2111.03606.

[6]  J. Gair,et al.  Noisy neighbours: inference biases from overlapping gravitational-wave signals , 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[7]  C. Moore,et al.  Testing general relativity with gravitational-wave catalogs: The insidious nature of waveform systematics , 2021, iScience.

[8]  P. B. Covas,et al.  Characterization of systematic error in Advanced LIGO calibration , 2020, Classical and Quantum Gravity.

[9]  C. Broeck,et al.  Science case for the Einstein telescope , 2019, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.

[10]  Duncan A. Brown,et al.  Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO , 2019, 1907.04833.

[11]  M. Oguri Effect of gravitational lensing on the distribution of gravitational waves from distant binary black hole mergers , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[12]  J. Powell Parameter estimation and model selection of gravitational wave signals contaminated by transient detector noise glitches , 2018, Classical and Quantum Gravity.

[13]  R. Adhikari,et al.  Systematic calibration error requirements for gravitational-wave detectors via the Cramér–Rao bound , 2017, Classical and Quantum Gravity.

[14]  C. A. Oxborrow,et al.  Planck2015 results , 2015, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[15]  Y. Wang,et al.  Exploring the sensitivity of next generation gravitational wave detectors , 2016, 1607.08697.

[16]  Benno Willke,et al.  The Einstein Telescope: a third-generation gravitational wave observatory , 2010 .

[17]  M. J. Williams,et al.  GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run , 2021, Physical Review D.

[18]  A. Nitz,et al.  A mock data study for 3G ground-based detectors: the performance loss of matched filtering due to correlated confusion noise , 2022 .

[19]  M. J. Williams,et al.  Population Properties of Compact Objects from the Second LIGO–Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog , 2021 .