Trade Openness and Carbon Leakage: Empirical Evidence from China’s Industrial Sector

China is a large import and export economy in global terms, and the carbon dioxide emissions and carbon leakage arising from trade have great significance for China’s foreign trade and its economy. On the basis of trade data for China’s 20 industrial sectors, we first built a panel data model to test the effect of trade on carbon dioxide emissions and the presence of carbon leakage for all industrial sectors. Second, we derived a single-region input–output model for open economies based on the industrial sectors’ diversity and carbon dioxide emissions, and performed an empirical test. We estimated the net carbon intensity embodied in export, which is 0.237tCO2/ten thousand RMB, to divide all sectors (ACSs) into high-carbon sectors (HCSs) and low-carbon sectors (LCSs). The results show that higher trade openness leads to a reduction in the intensity of CO2 emissions and gross emissions and that there are obvious structural differences in different sectors with different carbon emission intensity. The coefficient of trade openness for LCSs is −0.073 and is statistically significant at the 1% level, so higher trade openness for LCSs leads to a reduction in the CO2 emissions intensity. However, the coefficient for HCSs is 0.117 and is statistically significant at the 10% level, indicating that higher trade openness increases the CO2 emissions’ intensity for HCSs. The difference is that higher trade openness in LCSs can help reduce the CO2 emissions’ intensity without the problem of carbon leakage and with the existence of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC), whereas there is no EKC for HCSs and carbon leakage may happen. We introduced dummy variables and found that a “pollution haven” effect exists in HCSs. The test results in HCSs and LCSs are exactly the opposite of each other, which shows that the carbon leakage of ACSs cannot be determined. The message that can be drawn for policy makers is that China does not need to worry about the adverse impact on the environment of trade opening up and should, in fact, increase the opening up of trade, while becoming acclimatized to environmental regulation of a new trade mode and new standards. This will help amplify the favorable impact of trade opening up on the environment and improve China’s international reputation. The policies related to trade should encourage structural adjustment between the sectors via the formulation of differential policies and impose a restraint on sectors that have high levels of CO2 emissions embodied in export.

[1]  T. Rutherford,et al.  Unilateral CO2 Reductions and Carbon Leakage: The Consequences of International Trade in Oil and Basic Materials , 1993 .

[2]  M. S. Taylor,et al.  North-South Trade and the Environment , 1994 .

[3]  J. C. van den Bergh,et al.  Economic growth and emissions: reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental Kuznets curves , 1998 .

[4]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  The Kyoto Protocol: Regional and Sectoral Contributions to the Carbon Leakage , 2001 .

[5]  Soumyananda Dinda,et al.  Income and Emission: A Panel Data based Cointegration Analysis , 2006 .

[6]  George Halkos,et al.  Environmental Kuznets Curve for sulfur: evidence using GMM estimation and random coefficient panel data models , 2003, Environment and Development Economics.

[7]  Robert J. Elliott,et al.  Determining the trade–environment composition effect: the role of capital, labor and environmental regulations , 2003 .

[8]  Sandra A. Brown,et al.  A conceptual framework and its application for addressing leakage: the case of avoided deforestation , 2003 .

[9]  Soumyananda Dinda Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey , 2004 .

[10]  Bin Shui,et al.  The role of CO2 embodiment in US-China trade , 2006 .

[11]  Bao Qun Economic Growth and Environmental Pollution: An Empirical Test for the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in China , 2006 .

[12]  Junyi Shen,et al.  A simultaneous estimation of Environmental Kuznets Curve: Evidence from China , 2006 .

[13]  Onno Kuik,et al.  Carbon Leakage With International Technology Spillovers , 2007 .

[14]  Terry Barker,et al.  Carbon leakage from unilateral Environmental Tax Reforms in Europe, 1995–2005 , 2007 .

[15]  L. Tong,et al.  An empirical test of the environmental Kuznets curve in China: A panel cointegration approach , 2008 .

[16]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change , 2008 .

[17]  Chi Ming Tam,et al.  EKC analysis for studying economic growth and environmental quality : a case study in China , 2009 .

[18]  Rüdiger Pethig,et al.  Carbon Leakage, the Green Paradox, and Perfect Future Markets , 2009 .

[19]  A. Jalil,et al.  Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A cointegration analysis for China , 2009 .

[20]  Ramazan Sarı,et al.  Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: Challenges faced by an EU candidate member , 2009 .

[21]  Shunsuke Managi,et al.  Does trade openness improve environmental quality , 2009 .

[22]  Marjan W. Hofkes,et al.  Border adjustment for European emissions trading: Competitiveness and carbon leakage , 2010 .

[23]  Yan Yunfeng,et al.  China's foreign trade and climate change: A case study of CO2 emissions , 2010 .

[24]  Chuanwang Sun,et al.  Evaluating carbon dioxide emissions in international trade of China , 2010 .

[25]  Yuan Wang,et al.  CO2 emissions embodied in China–US trade: Input–output analysis based on the emergy/dollar ratio , 2011 .

[26]  Ge Chen,et al.  Embodied carbon dioxide emission at supra-national scale: A coalition analysis for G7, BRIC, and the rest of the world , 2011 .

[27]  Daniel H. Karney,et al.  Negative Leakage , 2011, Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.

[28]  Jie He,et al.  Economic Structure, Development Policy and Environmental Quality: An Empirical Analysis of Environmental Kuznets Curves with Chinese Municipal Data , 2011 .

[29]  Lei Chen,et al.  The Co-integration Analysis of Carbon Emission and Service Trade: from China's Empirical Analysis , 2012 .

[30]  YU Guan-shen Trade Openness, Economic Growth and Restructuring of Labor-intensive Industries , 2012 .

[31]  Zhao Zhong-xi CO_2 Emissions Embodied in China’s International Trade:A Perspective of Allocating International Responsibilities , 2012 .

[32]  Lee Liu,et al.  Environmental poverty, a decomposed environmental Kuznets curve, and alternatives: Sustainability lessons from China , 2012 .

[33]  Piergiuseppe Fortunato,et al.  International Trade and Carbon Emissions , 2012 .

[34]  Jared C. Carbone Linking Numerical and Analytical Models of Carbon Leakage , 2013 .

[35]  Joshua Elliott,et al.  Can a Unilateral Carbon Tax Reduce Emissions Elsewhere? , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[36]  Malin Song,et al.  Inflection point of environmental Kuznets curve in Mainland China , 2013 .

[37]  Don Fullerton,et al.  Leakage, Welfare, and Cost-Effectiveness of Carbon Policy , 2013 .

[38]  Y. Cao Does Composition Effect of Trade Opening Aggravate Environment Pollution in China?An Empirical Analysis Based on Panel Data of Prefecture Cities , 2013 .

[39]  Chuanqi Fan,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Environmental Kuznets Curve in Sichuan Province, China , 2013 .

[40]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Input–output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade: Competitive versus non-competitive imports , 2013 .

[41]  Sebastian Rausch,et al.  A Numerical Investigation of the Potential for Negative Emissions Leakage , 2013 .

[42]  J. Lin FDI,Export and Carbon Dioxide Emissions:A Comparative Study with East Asian Developing and Developed Economies , 2013 .

[43]  S. Davis,et al.  China’s international trade and air pollution in the United States , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Jianhua Yin,et al.  The effects of environmental regulation and technical progress on CO2 Kuznets curve: An evidence from China , 2015 .

[45]  Jingyan Fu,et al.  International trade, carbon leakage, and CO2 emissions of manufacturing industry , 2015 .

[46]  Christoph Böhringer,et al.  Robust policies to mitigate carbon leakage , 2017 .

[47]  Li Li,et al.  Chinese Provinces' CO2 Emissions Embodied in Imports and Exports , 2018, Earth's Future.

[48]  Shuanglu Liang,et al.  Export Diversification and Ecological Footprint: A Comparative Study on EKC Theory among Korea, Japan, and China , 2018, Sustainability.