Time trends of technology mediated communication with friends among bullied and not bullied children in four Nordic countries between 2001 and 2010

BACKGROUND Friends are important in childhood and adolescence, especially to bullied children. Technology mediated communication (TMC) could be used both to develop and maintain friendship. The present study examined (1) trends in the use of TMC with friends between 2001 and 2010; (2) possible differences between bullied and not bullied children and (3) differences between children with few close friends and children with several close friends. METHODS Data were obtained from three waves of the serial cross-sectional Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children survey conducted in Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Sweden during 2001/2002, 2005/2006 and 2009/2010. The total sample consisted of 65 953 children aged 11, 13 and 15. RESULTS Two trends were observed. The first trend showed an increased use of TMC in all countries. Children that were not bullied and/or had several close friends had increased their use of TMC with friends from 2001 to 2010. The second trend was applicable only for bullied children with few close friends; they had not as other children increased their use of TMC and thus remained at the same levels as in 2001/2002. CONCLUSIONS Bullied children with few close friends were excluded from communication forums that usually allow children to maintain and develop friendships. This is a concern because friends are important during childhood and adolescence, especially for bullied children.

[1]  M. Petzold,et al.  Differences in prevalence of bullying victimization between native and immigrant children in the Nordic countries: a parent-reported serial cross-sectional study. , 2015, Child: care, health and development.

[2]  J. Vessey,et al.  Measuring the youth bullying experience: a systematic review of the psychometric properties of available instruments. , 2014, The Journal of school health.

[3]  L. Arseneault,et al.  Adult health outcomes of childhood bullying victimization: evidence from a five-decade longitudinal British birth cohort. , 2014, The American journal of psychiatry.

[4]  L. Osberg,et al.  Is all bullying the same? , 2014, Archives of Public Health.

[5]  M. Petzold,et al.  Mental Health Problems and Social Resource Factors Among Bullied Children in the Nordic Countries: A Population Based Cross-sectional Study , 2014, Child Psychiatry & Human Development.

[6]  D. Olweus School bullying: development and some important challenges. , 2013, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[7]  K. Davis Friendship 2.0: adolescents' experiences of belonging and self-disclosure online. , 2012, Journal of adolescence.

[8]  Jong-Eun Roselyn Lee,et al.  Who wants to be "friend-rich"? Social compensatory friending on Facebook and the moderating role of public self-consciousness , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  Online communication among adolescents: an integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. , 2011, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[10]  A. M. Sund,et al.  Prevalence of bullying and aggressive behavior and their relationship to mental health problems among 12- to 15-year-old Norwegian adolescents , 2010, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

[11]  E. Meland,et al.  Emotional, self-conceptual, and relational characteristics of bullies and the bullied , 2010, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[12]  R. Iannotti,et al.  School bullying among adolescents in the United States: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. , 2009, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[13]  Tom T Bogt,et al.  Electronic media communication with friends from 2002 to 2006 and links to face-to-face contacts in adolescence: an HBSC study in 31 European and North American countries and regions , 2009, International Journal of Public Health.

[14]  Pernille Due,et al.  Cross-national time trends in bullying behaviour 1994–2006: findings from Europe and North America , 2009, International Journal of Public Health.

[15]  M. Overpeck,et al.  A cross-national profile of bullying and victimization among adolescents in 40 countries , 2009, International Journal of Public Health.

[16]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  The Effects of Instant Messaging on the Quality of Adolescents’ Existing Friendships: A Longitudinal Study , 2009 .

[17]  P. Greenfield,et al.  Self-Presentation and Gender on MySpace. , 2008 .

[18]  Claire L. Fox,et al.  Friendship as a moderator of the relationship between social skills problems and peer victimisation , 2006 .

[19]  Louis Leung,et al.  Unwillingness-to-communicate, perceptions of the Internet and self-disclosure in ICQ , 2006, Telematics Informatics.

[20]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  Adolescents’ identity experiments on the internet , 2005 .

[21]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Profiles of non-victims, escaped victims, continuing victims and new victims of school bullying. , 2004, The British journal of educational psychology.

[22]  Els Rommes,et al.  The Significance of Reciprocal and Unilateral Friendships for Peer Victimization in Adolescence , 2009, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[23]  J. Alison Bryant,et al.  IMing, Text Messaging, and Adolescent Social Networks , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[24]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Internet Paradox Revisited , 2002 .

[25]  W. Bukowski,et al.  The power of friendship: protection against an escalating cycle of peer victimization. , 1999, Developmental psychology.