A modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics

The aim of this paper is to introduce a new member of the family of the modal interpretations of quantum mechanics. In this modal-Hamiltonian interpretation, the Hamiltonian of the quantum system plays a decisive role in the property-ascription rule that selects the definite-valued observables whose possible values become actual. We show that this interpretation is effective for solving the measurement problem, both in its ideal and its non-ideal versions, and we argue for the physical relevance of the property-ascription rule by applying it to well-known physical situations. Moreover, we explain how this interpretation supplies a description of the elemental categories of the ontology referred to by the theory, where quantum systems turn out to be bundles of possible properties

[1]  Wang,et al.  Integrability and nonintegrability of quantum systems: Quantum integrability and dynamical symmetry. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[2]  S. French,et al.  Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis , 2006 .

[3]  Olivier Darrigol,et al.  Erwin Schrödinger : philosophy and the birth of quantum mechanics , 1992 .

[4]  O. Lombardi,et al.  The classical limit of non-integrable quantum systems, a route to quantum chaos , 2006 .

[5]  Newton C. A. da Costa,et al.  Set-Theoretical Models for Quantum Systems , 1999 .

[6]  Elena Castellani Interpreting bodies : classical and quantum objects in modern physics , 1998 .

[7]  M. Castagnino,et al.  The Formulation of Quantum Mechanics in Terms of Nuclear Algebras , 1999 .

[8]  G. D. Francia,et al.  IDENTITY QUESTIONS FROM QUANTUM THEORY , 1995 .

[9]  L. Vaidman On the Paradoxical Aspects of New Quantum Experiments , 1994, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[10]  J. Linnett,et al.  Quantum mechanics , 1975, Nature.

[11]  Mauricio Suárez,et al.  Quantum Selections, Propensities and the Problem of Measurement , 2004, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[12]  C. Hooker,et al.  Contemporary research in the foundations and philosophy of quantum theory : proceedings of a conference held at the University of Western Ontario, London, Canada , 1973 .

[13]  Peter Mittelstaedt The interpretation of quantum mechanics and the measurement process , 1997 .

[14]  M. Gadella,et al.  The Problem of the Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics and the Role of Self-Induced Decoherence , 2006 .

[15]  Must a molecule have a shape , 1978 .

[16]  Scopes and limits of modality in quantum mechanics , 2006, quant-ph/0612226.

[17]  C. cohen-tannoudji,et al.  Quantum Mechanics: , 2020, Fundamentals of Physics II.

[18]  Dennis Dieks,et al.  A Perspectival Version of the Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Origin of Macroscopic Behavior , 2001 .

[19]  O. Lombardi,et al.  Non-integrability and mixing in quantum systems: On the way to quantum chaos , 2007 .

[20]  John Tucker,et al.  OBSERVATION AND INTERPRETATION IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF PHYSICS , 1963 .

[21]  O. Lombardi,et al.  Self-induced decoherence: a new approach , 2004 .

[22]  Roberto Giuntini,et al.  Language, Quantum, Music , 1999 .

[23]  H. Primas Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics and Reductionism , 1981 .

[24]  Ronald N. Giere,et al.  A laplacean formal semantics for single-case propensities , 1976, J. Philos. Log..

[25]  Functional Approach to Quantum Decoherence and the Classical Final Limit: The Mott and Cosmological Problems , 2000, gr-qc/0006012.

[26]  Newton C. A. da Costa,et al.  An Intensional Schrödinger Logic , 1997, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[27]  Andrew Elby Why “modal” interpretations of quantum mechanics don't solve the measurement problem , 1993 .

[28]  L. Ballentine Quantum mechanics : a modern development , 1998 .

[29]  Paul Teller,et al.  Particle Labels and the Theory of Indistinguishable Particles in Quantum Mechanics , 1992, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[30]  Décio Krause,et al.  On a Quasi-Set Theory , 1992, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[31]  Guido Bacciagaluppi,et al.  Modal interpretations, decoherence and measurements , 1996 .

[32]  B. Loewer,et al.  Non-ideal measurements , 1993 .

[33]  Kostas Gavroglu,et al.  Physics, Philosophy, and the Scientific Community , 1995 .

[34]  M. Hamermesh Group theory and its application to physical problems , 1962 .

[35]  L. Vaidman,et al.  Quantum mechanical interaction-free measurements , 1993, hep-th/9305002.

[36]  N L Harshman,et al.  Galilean and dynamical invariance of entanglement in particle scattering. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[37]  Jeffrey Bub,et al.  On the structure of quantal proposition systems , 1994 .

[38]  A. Barut,et al.  Theory of group representations and applications , 1977 .

[39]  O. Lombardi,et al.  A General Conceptual Framework for Decoherence in Closed and Open Systems , 2007, Philosophy of Science.

[40]  Alfred Tarski,et al.  Relational selves as self-affirmational resources , 2008 .

[41]  R. Omnes,et al.  Understanding Quantum Mechanics , 2020 .

[42]  Dennis Dieks Probability in modal interpretations of quantum mechanics , 2007 .

[43]  H. Jeffreys A Treatise on Probability , 1922, Nature.

[44]  O. Lombardi,et al.  Self‐Induced Decoherence and the Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics , 2005, Philosophy of Science.

[45]  Guido Bacciagaluppi,et al.  Dynamics for Modal Interpretations , 1999 .

[46]  Jeffrey Bub,et al.  Paradigms and Paradoxes: The philosophical challenge of the quantum domain , 1976 .

[47]  Harold I. Brown,et al.  How the Laws of Physics Lie , 1988 .

[48]  Ian Hacking,et al.  The Emergence of Probability: Duality , 2006 .

[49]  Robert Olkiewicz,et al.  The Schrödinger problem , 1994 .

[50]  M. Scully,et al.  Distribution functions in physics: Fundamentals , 1984 .

[51]  M. Bunge Treatise on basic philosophy , 1974 .

[52]  H. Weyl The Theory Of Groups And Quantum Mechanics , 1931 .

[53]  M. Tinkham Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics , 1964 .

[54]  W. Zurek II. Quantum mechanics and measurement theoryEnvironment-induced decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical , 1993 .

[55]  Roland Omnès The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 1987 .

[56]  Quantum mechanics without the projection postulate , 1992 .

[57]  Bas C. van Fraassen Semantic Analysis of Quantum Logic , 1973 .

[58]  Paul Roman,et al.  Advanced Quantum Theory , 1965 .

[59]  K. Popper The Propensity Interpretation of Probability , 1959 .

[60]  P. Vermaas Unique transition probabilities in the modal interpretation , 1996 .

[61]  Decoherence time in self-induced decoherence , 2005, quant-ph/0502087.

[62]  B. Russell,et al.  Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy , 1920, The Mathematical Gazette.

[63]  Classical limit of non-integrable systems , 2005, quant-ph/0503118.

[64]  Casati,et al.  Comment on "Decoherence, chaos, and the second law" , 1995, Physical review letters.

[65]  Michael J. Loux Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction , 1997 .

[66]  Bas C. van Fraassen,et al.  The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox , 1974 .

[67]  A. Raczyński,et al.  Symposium on the foundations of modern physics : edited by P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore 1985 , 1986 .

[68]  The Self-Induced Approach to Decoherence in Cosmology , 2002, quant-ph/0211163.

[69]  R. Hughes,et al.  The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 1989 .

[70]  R. G. Woolley,et al.  Must a molecule have a shape , 1978 .

[71]  D. W. Cohen,et al.  An Introduction to Hilbert Space and Quantum Logic , 1989 .

[72]  W. Zurek Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical , 2001, quant-ph/0105127.

[73]  Hans Reichenbach,et al.  The theory of probability , 1968 .

[74]  O. Lombardi,et al.  The classical limit of quantum mechanics: Self-induced decoherence and macroscopicity , 2006 .

[75]  Giovanna Corsi,et al.  Bridging the gap: philosophy, mathematics, and physics , 1993 .

[76]  S. Haack Philosophy of logics , 1978 .

[77]  E. Specker,et al.  The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics , 1967 .

[78]  F. Ramsey The foundations of mathematics , 1932 .

[79]  Wojciech H. Zurek,et al.  Decoherence, einselection and the existential interpretation (the rough guide) , 1998, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[80]  William G. Faris Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness , 1997 .

[81]  Gary M. Hardegree The Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 1976, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[82]  Pieter E. Vermaas,et al.  The modal interpretation of quantum mechanics and its generalization to density operators , 1995 .

[83]  W. Quine On What There Is , 1948 .

[84]  Weber,et al.  Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. , 1986, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[85]  N. L. Harshman,et al.  Tensor Product Structures, Entanglement, and Particle Scattering , 2007, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[86]  B. Loewer,et al.  Wanted Dead or Alive: Two Attempts to Solve Schrodinger's Paradox , 1990, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[87]  Algebraic Formulation of Quantum Decoherence , 2001, math-ph/0108001.

[88]  J. Butterfield Interpretation and identity in quantum theory , 1993 .

[89]  Wu-Ki Tung,et al.  Group Theory in Physics , 1985 .

[90]  Giulio Casati,et al.  Quantum chaos: unexpected complexity , 1995 .

[91]  H. Jeffreys,et al.  Theory of probability , 1896 .

[92]  V. Fock,et al.  Zur Theorie des Wasserstoffatoms , 1935 .

[93]  Rudolf Haag,et al.  Local quantum physics : fields, particles, algebras , 1993 .

[94]  A. Wald,et al.  Probability, statistics and truth , 1939 .

[95]  Dennis Dieks,et al.  The Formalism of Quantum Theory: An Objective Description of Reality? , 1988 .

[96]  B. M. Hill,et al.  Theory of Probability , 1990 .

[97]  L. Hove Energy corrections and persistent perturbation effects in continuous spectra , 1955 .

[98]  Leslie E Ballentine,et al.  The statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics , 1970 .

[99]  M. L. Dalla Chiara,et al.  Individuals, Kinds and Names in Physics , 1993 .

[100]  A. Mullin,et al.  Group Theory and its Applications to Physical Problems , 1962 .

[101]  Martha Kneale,et al.  The development of logic , 1963 .