iPaCS: An integrative power and cyber systems co-simulation framework for smart grid

Geographically distributed phasor measurement units (PMUs) connected to phasor data concentrators (PDCs) through various cyber network topologies result in latency and bandwidth constrained. These factors need to be analyzed and optimized during the evaluation of their impact on the data stream based applications, which is essential in wide area measurement and monitoring systems (WAMS). This paper presents an integrative Power and Cyber systems (iPaCS) framework, and discusses the iPaCS testbed design for an integration of PMU and PDC software systems through ns-3 cyber simulator. PMU and PDC software packages of an iPDC open-source software system installed in dedicated virtual machines act as measurement emulators for a power system network, whereas a dedicated virtual machine used for executing the ns-3 software system simulates networks of communicating nodes and the traffic between them. Linux containers, lightweight virtualization technology, are used for creating the virtual machines environment. The iPaCS testbed is suitable to evaluate applications such as 1) impact of latency and bandwidth on WAMS data stream based control and protection applications, 2) congestion effect due to various data traffic scenarios between PMU and PDC systems, and 3) impact of cyber attacks on power system networks. A two area four-machine power system is considered to demonstrate the testbed for various datasets in a cyber network topology. Results such as latency for the chosen datasets evaluate its impact on WAMS.

[1]  César A. F. De Rose,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Container-Based Virtualization for High Performance Computing Environments , 2013, 2013 21st Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing.

[2]  Salim Hariri,et al.  A testbed for analyzing security of SCADA control systems (TASSCS) , 2011, ISGT 2011.

[3]  R A Dougal,et al.  VPNET: A co-simulation framework for analyzing communication channel effects on power systems , 2011, 2011 IEEE Electric Ship Technologies Symposium.

[4]  J. Nutaro,et al.  Integrated Hybrid-Simulation of Electric Power and Communications Systems , 2007, 2007 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[5]  Kun Zhu,et al.  ICT Architecture Impact on Wide Area Monitoring and Control Systems' Reliability , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[6]  Xiaoyang Tong The Co-simulation Extending for Wide-area Communication Networks in Power System , 2010, 2010 Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference.

[7]  Kedar V. Khandeparkar,et al.  Design of a Phasor Data Concentrator for Wide Area Measurement System , 2012 .

[8]  Gelli Ravikumar,et al.  Taxonomy of PMU Data Based Catastrophic Indicators for Power System Stability Assessment , 2018, IEEE Systems Journal.

[9]  Rüdiger Franke Flexible modeling of electrical power systems -- the Modelica PowerSystems library , 2014 .

[10]  R. Giovanini,et al.  EPOCHS: a platform for agent-based electric power and communication simulation built from commercial off-the-shelf components , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Vincenzo Liberatore,et al.  Smart grid communication and co-simulation , 2011, IEEE 2011 EnergyTech.

[12]  Sandeep K. Shukla,et al.  GECO: Global Event-Driven Co-Simulation Framework for Interconnected Power System and Communication Network , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.