Discriminant Analysis as a Machine Learning Method for Revision of User Stereotypes of Information Retrieval Systems

This paper proposes to use the discriminant analysis technique as a machine learning method to adjust memberships of stereotypes, based on the user’s in-depth, task-related knowledge contained in the user models. The paper reports an empirical study on the user stereotypes of information retrieval (IR) systems. The participants were first assigned into stereotypes based on their self-reported characteristics. Their memberships in the stereotypes were then tested and predicted using the discriminant analysis, based on their IR knowledge. The pre-assigned membership and the predicted membership of each stereotype were compared. The study demonstrates that the discriminant analysis technique can be used to detect the conflicts between individual users’ knowledge and the assumption held by stereotypes that all members in a stereotype share common knowledge. The technique can be used to revise/reclassify a person’s membership of a stereotype based on the person’s knowledge. Implications and future directions of the study are discussed.

[1]  Fabio Paternò,et al.  Effective levels of adaptation to different types of users in interactive museum systems , 2000 .

[2]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  KN-AHS: an adaptive hypertext client of the user modeling system BGP-MS , 1998 .

[3]  Thomas Deelman,et al.  The development of behavior-based user models for a computer system , 1999 .

[4]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  All users of information retrieval systems are not created equal: An exploration into individual differences , 1989, Inf. Process. Manag..

[5]  Peter Lund,et al.  Providing a networked future for interpersonal information retrieval: InfoVine and user modelling , 1998, Interact. Comput..

[6]  Karen Sparck Jones Realism About User Modeling , 1989 .

[7]  Elaine Rich,et al.  Stereotypes and User Modeling , 1989 .

[8]  Mark Chignell,et al.  Assessment of the effects of user characteristics on mental models of information retrieval systems , 2001 .

[9]  Xiangmin Zhang Collaborative relevance judgment: A group consensus method for evaluating user search performance , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  C. J. Huberty,et al.  Applied Discriminant Analysis , 1994 .

[11]  Bryce Allen,et al.  Information Tasks: Toward a User-Centered Approach to Information Systems , 1996 .

[12]  Johan Gustav Bellika,et al.  The virtual library secretary: A user model-based software agent , 2005, Personal Technologies.

[13]  Peretz Shoval,et al.  Stereotypes in Information Filtering Systems , 1997, Inf. Process. Manag..

[14]  Giovanni Guida,et al.  User modeling in expert man-machine interfaces: a case study in intelligent information retrieval , 1990, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[15]  Max A. Woodbury,et al.  Individualizing user interfaces: application of the Grade of Membership (GoM) model for development of fuzzy user classes , 1994 .

[16]  Baltasar Fernández-Manjón,et al.  Pragmatic user model implementation in an intelligent help system , 1998, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[17]  David N. Chin KNOME: Modeling What the User Knows in UC , 1989 .

[18]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  A Review and Analysis of Commercial User Modeling Servers for Personalization on the World Wide Web , 2000, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.