Let $\mathcal{H}$ be a family of connected graphs. A graph $G$ is said to be $\mathcal{H}$-free if $G$ does not contain any members of $\mathcal{H}$ as an induced subgraph. Let $\mathcal{F}(\mathcal{H})$ be the family of connected $\mathcal{H}$-free graphs. In this context, the members of $\mathcal{H}$ are called forbidden subgraphs. In this paper, we focus on two pairs of forbidden subgraphs containing a common graph, and compare the classes of graphs satisfying each of the two forbidden subgraph conditions. Our main result is the following: Let $H_{1},H_{2},H_{3}$ be connected graphs of order at least three, and suppose that $H_{1}$ is twin-less. If the symmetric difference of $\mathcal{F}(\{H_{1},H_{2}\})$ and $\mathcal{F}(\{H_{1},H_{3}\})$ is finite and the tuple $(H_{1};H_{2},H_{3})$ is non-trivial in a sense, then $H_{2}$ and $H_{3}$ are obtained from the same vertex-transitive graph by successively replacing a vertex with a clique and joining the neighbors of the original vertex and the clique. Furthermore, we refine a result in [Combin. Probab. Comput. 22 (2013) 733 – 748] concerning forbidden pairs.
[1]
Zdenek Ryjácek,et al.
Claw-free graphs - A survey
,
1997,
Discret. Math..
[2]
Reinhard Diestel,et al.
Graph Theory, 4th Edition
,
2012,
Graduate texts in mathematics.
[3]
Shinya Fujita,et al.
Forbidden Subgraphs Generating Almost the Same Sets
,
2013,
Comb. Probab. Comput..
[4]
Jun Fujisawa,et al.
A pair of forbidden subgraphs and perfect matchings in graphs of high connectivity
,
2011,
Comb..
[5]
Haitze J. Broersma,et al.
Restrictions on induced subgraphs ensuring hamiltonicity or pancyclicity of K1,3-free graphs
,
1990
.
[6]
Ralph J. Faudree,et al.
Characterizing forbidden pairs for hamiltonian properties
,
1997,
Discret. Math..