REVISITING THE MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY-PUSH SITUATIONS BY MAXIMIZING DISCOVERY AND INHIBITING SCREENING

While companies are increasingly investing in the development of new technologies, they are often faced with situations where they have to identify potential applications to a new technology. As it seems to be a major challenge, many methods addressing this application identification issue have been developed. However what makes them more or less successful remains unclear. Our paper proposes to explore the efficiency of an application identification method maximising functional discovery and inhibiting screening. Our research work relies on an empirical methodology, more specifically the efficiency of our method was tested on a single case study that respected very specific conditions. Maximising functional discovery and inhibiting screening proved to be an efficient way of identifying applications to the technology. This result provides new ways of managing technology-push method by highlighting efficient ways of designing application identification methods.

[1]  R. Balachandra,et al.  SPOTTING THE CUSTOMER FOR EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES , 1999 .

[2]  Clayton G. Smith Understanding technological substitution: Generic types, substitution dynamics, and influence strategies , 1992 .

[3]  Markus Glaser,et al.  Triz for Reverse Inventing in Market Research: A Case Study from Wittenstein AG, Identifying New Areas of Application of a Core Technology , 2009 .

[4]  Gregory Loren Bishop A Comprehensive Model for Technology Push Product Development , 2004 .

[5]  Scott L. Newbert,et al.  Defining the Relationship among Founding Resources, Strategies, and Performance in Technology‐Intensive New Ventures: Evidence from the Semiconductor Silicon Industry** , 2007 .

[6]  Kenneth O. Stanley,et al.  Abandoning Objectives: Evolution Through the Search for Novelty Alone , 2011, Evolutionary Computation.

[7]  Jochen Runde,et al.  On the Identity of Technological Objects and User Innovations in Function , 2009 .

[8]  Joachim Henkel,et al.  Identifying Technology Applications Using an Adaptation of the Lead User Method , 2010 .

[9]  William E. Souder,et al.  Improving Productivity Through Technology Push , 1989 .

[10]  Orestis Terzidis,et al.  A Unified Model of the Technology Push Process and Its Application in a Workshop Setting , 2018 .

[11]  Mauro Caetano,et al.  Roadmapping for technology push and partnership: A contribution for open innovation environments , 2011 .

[12]  Alexander Brem,et al.  Integration of market pull and technology push in the corporate front end and innovation management—Insights from the German software industry , 2009 .

[13]  Michael Heiss,et al.  The technology tree concept-an evolutionary approach to technology management in a rapidly changing market , 2001, IEMC'01 Proceedings. Change Management and the New Industrial Revolution. IEMC-2001 (Cat. No.01CH37286).

[14]  Thomas Gillier,et al.  Exploring Over: The Presumed Identity of Emerging Technology , 2011 .

[15]  G. Dosi Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[16]  Jürgen Gausemeier,et al.  Technology push-based product planning – future markets for emerging technologies , 2013 .

[17]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technological Paradigms and Trajectories , 2007 .

[18]  Mark P. Rice,et al.  New Market Creation for Breakthrough Innovations: Enabling and Constraining Mechanisms , 2013 .

[19]  F Lynn,et al.  From experience: Where does your new technology fit into the marketplace? , 1992 .

[20]  A. Kazakçi,et al.  The Impact of Type of Examples on Originality: Explaining Fixation and Stimulation Effects. , 2014 .

[21]  Christopher Lettl,et al.  Management of "technology push" development projects , 2004, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[22]  Byungun Yoon,et al.  Technology-driven roadmaps for identifying new product/market opportunities: Use of text mining and quality function deployment , 2015, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[23]  Spencer P. Magleby,et al.  A Review of Technology Push Product Development Models and Processes , 2004 .

[24]  G. Lynn,et al.  Marketing and Discontinuous Innovation: The Probe and Learn Process , 1996 .

[25]  Kenneth O. Stanley,et al.  Novelty Search and the Problem with Objectives , 2011 .