Implementing eco-industrial parks in existing clusters. Findings from a historical Italian chemical site

Industrial Ecology (IE) is considered a recent but very promising research field; it offers new perspectives of solutions to environmental problems related to production that combines the aim of sustainability, both global and local, with the competitiveness of companies. The application of IE principles at the local level lead to the development of Eco-Industrial Parks (EIPs). An EIP can arise spontaneously, by the initiative of companies, or be guided by local government; it can result in the creation of a new industrial site or in the involvement of production plants already present in a given region. A number of factors may promote or prevent the implementation of an EIP: level of analysis; geographic and technical requirements; homogeneity/heterogeneity of industries; stakeholders and local community involvement; regulatory system. We call them Key Drivers. Industrial cluster is the referential model of territorial agglomeration of companies; it has been proven to be one of the best models of Italian industrial development in terms of efficiency and flexibility, with a strong involvement of local community. EIPs could be considered a viable solution to increase sustainability and competitiveness of existing industrial clusters, exploiting common features of both models, primarily, the geographic proximity of companies. However, also in countries characterized by a large diffusion of industrial clusters, such as Italy, there are no operating EIPs. This paper presents the results of a research project, originally aimed at revitalizing a historical chemical site located in Bussi sul Tirino (Abruzzo Region-Italy) through the application of IE principles. Furthermore, the role of Key Drivers in the specific context of existing industrial cluster is analysed. Empirical evidences show a particular suitability of the Bussi Chemical Site to evolve into an EIP, leading towards economic, environmental and social benefits. The involvement of neighbouring industrial clusters and the establishment of new companies in the chemical site are considered in potential scenarios design. Results also point out that the history of the long-standing industrial cluster influenced the presence and the role played by some Key Drivers, especially local community, which proved to be crucial in preventing the full implementation of the EIP.

[1]  Andreas Koenig,et al.  Quo Vadis EIP? How Eco‐industrial Parks are Evolving , 2005 .

[2]  Leo Baas,et al.  Cleaner production and industrial ecosystems, a Dutch experience , 1998 .

[3]  E. Hertwich.  Consumption and Industrial Ecology , 2005 .

[4]  Xiangping Zhang,et al.  Model-centered approach to early planning and design of an eco-industrial park around an oil refinery. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Andrea Raggi,et al.  Industrial ecology as a planning approach for a sustainable tanning industrial estate , 2008 .

[7]  Braden R. Allenby,et al.  A design for environment methodology for evaluating materials , 1996 .

[8]  Ernest A. Lowe,et al.  Creating by-product resource exchanges: Strategies for eco-industrial parks , 1997 .

[9]  Pierre Desrochers,et al.  Industrial ecology and the rediscovery of inter‐firm recycling linkages: historical evidence and policy implications , 2002 .

[10]  Michael J. Enright,et al.  Organization and Coordination in Geographically Concentrated Industries , 1995 .

[11]  David Gibbs,et al.  Industrial Ecology and Regional Development: Eco-Industrial Development as Cluster Policy , 2008 .

[12]  N. E. Gallopoulos,et al.  Strategies for Manufacturing , 1989 .

[13]  Thomas E. Graedel,et al.  ON THE CONCEPT OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY , 1996 .

[14]  Ash Amin,et al.  Holding Down The Global , 1994 .

[15]  Eric B. Dent,et al.  Challenging “Resistance to Change” , 1999 .

[16]  Fiorenza Belussi,et al.  Variety of pattern of the post-fordist economy: Why are the ‘old times’ still with us and the ‘new times’ yet to come? , 1996 .

[17]  G. Watson.  Resistance to Change , 1971 .

[18]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  Resisting Organizational Inertia: The Evolution of Industrial Districts , 1999 .

[19]  Erich J. Schwarz,et al.  Implementing nature's lesson: The industrial recycling network enhancing regional development , 1997 .

[20]  T. Tudor,et al.  Drivers and limitations for the successful development and functioning of EIPs (eco-industrial parks): A literature review , 2007 .

[21]  L. W. Ayres,et al.  Industrial ecology: Towards closing the material cycle , 1996 .

[22]  Leenard Baas,et al.  An industrial ecology project in practice: Exploring the boundaries of decision-making levels in regional industrial systems , 2004 .

[23]  R. Martin,et al.  Path dependence and regional economic evolution , 2006 .

[24]  Raymond P. Côté,et al.  Supporting pillars for industrial ecosystems , 1997 .

[25]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  Genserik Reniers,et al.  Empirically based development of a framework for advancing and stimulating collaboration in the chemical industry (ASC): creating sustainable chemical industrial parks , 2010 .

[27]  Michaela Trippl,et al.  Like Phoenix from the Ashes? The Renewal of Clusters in Old Industrial Areas , 2004 .

[28]  W. Vermeulen,et al.  Eco-industrial park initiatives in the USA and the Netherlands: first lessons , 2004 .

[29]  Paolo Guerrieri,et al.  Industrial Districts’ Evolution and Technological Regimes: Italy and Taiwan , 2004 .

[30]  Sergio Paba,et al.  Per una storia dei distretti industriali italiani dal secondo dopoguerra agli anni novanta , 1997 .

[31]  F. Molina-Morales.  European industrial districts: Influence of geographic concentration on performance of the firm , 2001 .

[32]  David Gibbs,et al.  Reflections on implementing industrial ecology through eco-industrial park development , 2007 .

[33]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[34]  Giacomo Becattini,et al.  Industrial Districts: A New Approach To Industrial Change , 2004 .

[35]  R. Martin,et al.  Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea? , 2003 .

[36]  Marian Chertow,et al.  INDUSTRIAL SYMBIOSIS: Literature and Taxonomy , 2000 .

[37]  Raymond P. Côté,et al.  Designing eco-industrial parks: a synthesis of some experiences , 1998 .

[38]  Anne K. Hewes,et al.  The Humanistic Side of Eco-Industrial Parks: Champions and the Role of Trust , 2008 .

[39]  S. Erkman.  Industrial ecology: An historical view , 1997 .

[40]  Gabi Dei Ottati,et al.  An Industrial District Facing the Challenges of Globalization: Prato Today , 2009 .

[41]  Marian Chertow,et al.  The Eco‐industrial Park Model Reconsidered , 1998 .

[42]  Leenard Baas,et al.  Critical success and limiting factors for eco-industrial parks: global trends and Egyptian context , 2011 .

[43]  Heinz-Peter Wallner,et al.  Towards sustainable development of industry: networking, complexity and eco-clusters , 1999 .

[44]  Marino Cavallo,et al.  La qualificazione degli insediamenti industriali : verso la costruzione di aree produttive ecologicamente attrezzate , 2007 .

[45]  Elisabeth Milchrahm,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in Recycling Networks: Fostering Sustainable Development , 2002, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[46]  G. Becattini,et al.  Industrial districts and inter-firm co-operation in Italy , 1990 .

[47]  J. Ford,et al.  Resistance to Change: The Rest of the Story , 2008 .

[48]  Matthew Leach,et al.  Quantifying ‘geographic proximity’: Experiences from the United Kingdom's National Industrial Symbiosis Programme , 2011 .

[49]  D. Mishra,et al.  Recovery of metal values from spent petroleum catalyst using leaching-solvent extraction technique , 2010 .

[50]  M. Chertow.  “Uncovering” Industrial Symbiosis , 2007 .

[51]  Pierre Desrochers,et al.  Regional development and inter-industry recycling linkages: some historical perspectives , 2002 .

[52]  J. Ehrenfeld,et al.  Industrial Ecology in Practice: The Evolution of Interdependence at Kalundborg , 1997 .

[53]  Tareq Emtairah,et al.  Industrial symbiosis networks and the contribution to environmental innovation: The case of the Landskrona industrial symbiosis programme , 2005 .

[54]  J. Korhonen,et al.  A material and energy flow model for co-production of heat and power , 2002 .

[55]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Best Practice? Geography, Learning and the Institutional Limits to Strong Convergence , 2001 .

[56]  W. Ashton.  The Structure, Function, and Evolution of a Regional Industrial Ecosystem , 2009 .

[57]  B. Harrison,et al.  Flexibility, hierarchy and regional development: The changing structure of industrial production systems and their forms of governance in the 1990s , 1991 .

[58]  Murat Mirata,et al.  Experiences from early stages of a national industrial symbiosis programme in the UK: determinants and coordination challenges , 2004 .

[59]  Brian H. Roberts,et al.  The application of industrial ecology principles and planning guidelines for the development of eco-industrial parks: an Australian case study , 2004 .

[60]  P. Pellenbarg,et al.  Sustainable Business Sites in the Netherlands: A Survey of Policies and Experiences , 2002 .

[61]  Thomas Ott,et al.  The industrial region as a promising unit for eco-industrial development—reflections, practical experience and establishment of innovative instruments to support industrial ecology , 2004 .