3D MDEFT imaging of the human brain at 4.7 T with reduced sensitivity to radiofrequency inhomogeneity

A modification to the 3D modified driven equilibrium Fourier transform (MDEFT) imaging technique is proposed that reduces its sensitivity to RF inhomogeneity. This is especially important at high field strengths where RF focusing effects exacerbate B1 inhomogeneity, causing significant signal nonuniformity in the images. The adiabatic inversion pulse used during the preparation period of the MDEFT sequence is replaced by a hard (nonadiabatic) pulse with a nominal flip angle of 130°. The spatial inhomogeneity of the hard pulse preparation compensates for the inhomogeneity of the excitation pulses. Uniform signal intensity is obtained for a wide range of B1 amplitudes and the high CNR characteristic of MDEFT is retained. The new approach was validated by numerical simulations and successfully applied to human brain imaging at 4.7 T, resulting in high‐quality T1‐weighted images of the whole human brain at high field strength with uniform signal intensity and contrast, despite the presence of significant RF inhomogeneity. Magn Reson Med 53:1452–1458, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Multimodal Image Coregistration and Partitioning—A Unified Framework , 1997, NeuroImage.

[2]  R Turner,et al.  Optimisation of the 3D MDEFT sequence for anatomical brain imaging: technical implications at 1.5 and 3 T , 2004, NeuroImage.

[3]  D. Hoult,et al.  The field dependence of NMR imaging. I. Laboratory assessment of signal‐to‐noise ratio and power deposition , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  K Shmueli,et al.  High resolution MRI of the brain at 4.7 Tesla using fast spin echo imaging. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[5]  R S Balaban,et al.  MR relaxation times in human brain: measurement at 4 T. , 1996, Radiology.

[6]  D. Hoult Sensitivity and Power Deposition in a High‐Field Imaging Experiment , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  High contrast and fast three‐dimensional magnetic resonance imaging at high fields , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  Robert Turner,et al.  High‐resolution fast spin echo imaging of the human brain at 4.7 T: Implementation and sequence characteristics , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  C. Schwarzbauer,et al.  MDEFT imaging of the human brain at 8 T , 1999, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[10]  R Turner,et al.  RF inhomogeneity compensation in structural brain imaging , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  R. Turner,et al.  Optimization of 3D MP-RAGE sequences for structural brain imaging , 2000, NeuroImage.

[12]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Ultrahigh field magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[13]  T. Parrish,et al.  3-D FLASH imaging using a single surface coil and a new adiabatic pulse, BIR-4. , 1990, Investigative radiology.

[14]  R. Turner,et al.  Optimization of 3-D MP-RAGE Sequences for Structural Brain Imaging , 2000, NeuroImage.

[15]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Functional mapping in the human brain using high magnetic fields. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[16]  David G Norris,et al.  High field human imaging , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  M. S. Silver,et al.  Highly selective {π}/{2} and π pulse generation , 1984 .

[18]  Michael B. Smith,et al.  Signal‐to‐noise ratio and absorbed power as functions of main magnetic field strength, and definition of “90°” RF pulse for the head in the birdcage coil , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  R. Goebel,et al.  7T vs. 4T: RF power, homogeneity, and signal‐to‐noise comparison in head images , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.