The role of the dominant social paradigm in environmental attitudes: a multinational examination

Abstract The purpose of this paper was twofold. The first purpose was to expand the domain of inquiry in the study of business and the natural environment. Traditional approaches have focused primarily on attitudes toward the environment, behavioral intentions, and behavior. Most of the research to date has been data-driven, however, and lacks a theoretical framework. We attempt to rectify this by proposing and testing an expanded model. Here the domain is expanded to include political, economic, and technological variables, referred to as the socioeconomic domain of the dominant social paradigm (DSP). While much has been written about the general nature of the DSP, its specific form has not been defined adequately in the environmentally related literature. The second purpose was to begin testing the proposed model empirically. The model suggests that as one's belief in the DSP increases, their expressed concern for the environment decreases. Further, as their concern for the environment increases, their perception of necessary changes and willingness to change to achieve environmental balance will also increase. Finally, we examined differences between countries and concluded that there were differences consistent with the proposed model. Overall, the results of the study confirm the proposed model. The policy implications of this result are also discussed.

[1]  Thomas F. Stafford,et al.  Green issues: Dimensions of environmental concern , 1994 .

[2]  W. Ophuls.  Ecology and the Politics of Scarcity: Prologue to a Political Theory of the Steady State , 1977 .

[3]  Paul Stoneman,et al.  Marketing Strategies and Market Prospects for Environmentally‐Friendly Consumer Products1 , 1996 .

[4]  W. Thomas Anderson,et al.  The Socially Conscious Consumer , 1972 .

[5]  Alfonso Montuori,et al.  Limits to Anthropocentrism: Toward an Ecocentric Organization Paradigm? , 1995 .

[6]  M. Drumwright.  Socially Responsible Organizational Buying: Environmental Concern as a Noneconomic Buying Criterion , 1994 .

[7]  Gregory M. Pickett,et al.  Is There a General Conserving Consumer? A Public Policy Concern , 1993 .

[8]  Anusorn Singhapakdi,et al.  The Link between Social Responsibility Orientation, Motive Appeals, and Voting Intention: A Case of an Anti-littering Campaign , 1991 .

[9]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Public Opinion in the 1980s Clear Consensus, Ambiguous Commitment , 1991 .

[10]  Nicolaos E. Synodinos.  Environmental attitudes and knowledge: A comparison of marketing and business students with other groups , 1990 .

[11]  Wallace E. Oates,et al.  Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm? , 1995 .

[12]  I. Balderjahn,et al.  Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible consumption patterns , 1988 .

[13]  C. B. Macpherson.  The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke , 1962 .

[14]  T. Smith.  The Myth of Green Marketing: Tending Our Goats at the Edge of Apocalypse , 1998 .

[15]  Ulrich Beck,et al.  Ecological Enlightenment: Essays on the Politics of the Risk Society , 1995 .

[16]  Neil Postman,et al.  Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology , 1993 .

[17]  Fern K. Willits,et al.  Environmental Attitudes and Behavior , 1994 .

[18]  Jack Arbuthnot,et al.  The Roles of Attitudinal and Personality Variables in the Prediction of Environmental Behavior and Knowledge , 1977 .

[19]  Brian Garrod,et al.  Environmental management and business strategy: Towards a new strategic paradigm , 1996 .

[20]  L. Winner.  The Whale and the Reactor , 2020 .

[21]  Lawrence A. Crosby,et al.  Using Benefit Segmentation to Influence Environmental Legislation: A Bottle Bill Application , 1991 .

[22]  P. Shrivastava.  The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological Sustainability , 1995 .

[23]  Daniel R. Krause.  Environmental Consciousness , 1993 .

[24]  Paul A. Zandbergen,et al.  Ecologically Sustainable Organizations: An Institutional Approach , 1995 .

[25]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Ark II; social response to environmental imperatives , 1973 .

[26]  L. Thurow.  The zero-sum society : distribution and the possibilities for economic change , 1981 .

[27]  W. Rosenbaum,et al.  Environmental politics and policy , 1985 .

[28]  Harold H. Kassarjian,et al.  Incorporating Ecology into Marketing Strategy: The Case of Air Pollution , 1971 .

[29]  S. Grunert,et al.  Everybody Seems Concerned About the Environment: But Is This Concern Reflected in (Danish) Consumers' Food Choice? , 1993 .

[30]  A. Sen,et al.  Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory , 1977 .

[31]  R. Dunlap,et al.  THE NEW ENVIRONMENTAL PARADIGM: 5 PROPOSED MEASURING INSTRUMENT AND PRELIMINARY RESULTS , 1978 .

[32]  P. McDonagh,et al.  Sustainable Consumption and the Quality of Life: A Macromarketing Challenge to the Dominant Social Paradigm , 1997 .

[33]  P. Ellen,et al.  The Role of Perceived Consumer Effectiveness in Motivating Environmentally Conscious Behaviors , 1991 .

[34]  James M. Jasper,et al.  Losing Ground: American Environmentalism at the Close of the Twentieth Century , 1995 .

[35]  P. Stern,et al.  Value Orientations, Gender, and Environmental Concern , 1993 .

[36]  R. Eckersley,et al.  Environmentalism And Political Theory: Toward An Ecocentric Approach , 1992 .

[37]  L. J. Shrum,et al.  The recycling of solid wastes: Personal values, value orientations, and attitudes about recycling as antecedents of recycling behavior , 1994 .

[38]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[39]  P. Stern,et al.  The New Ecological Paradigm in Social-Psychological Context , 1995 .

[40]  J. Dryzek.  Democracy in Capitalist Times: Ideals, Limits, and Struggles , 1997 .

[41]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Environmental Concern , 1981 .

[42]  Suzanne C. Beckmann,et al.  Review and Critical Assessment of Research on Marketing and the Environment , 1998 .

[43]  James A. Roberts.  Green consumers in the 1990s: Profile and implications for advertising , 1996 .

[44]  S. Cotgrove.  Catastrophe or cornucopia: The environment, politics, and the future , 1982 .

[45]  A. Dobson.  Green Political Thought , 1990 .

[46]  Thomas C. Kinnear,et al.  Ecologically Concerned Consumers: Who are They? , 1974 .

[47]  Noan Walley,et al.  It's not easy being green , 1994 .

[48]  A. Hirschman,et al.  The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph , 1977 .

[49]  Diane M. Samdahl,et al.  Social Determinants of Environmental Concern , 1989 .

[50]  Subhash Sharma.  Applied multivariate techniques , 1995 .

[51]  Charles H. Schwepker,et al.  An Examination of Ecologically Concerned Consumers and Their Intention to Purchase Ecologically Packaged Products , 1991 .

[52]  Hans Jørn Juhl,et al.  Values, environmental attitudes, and buying of organic foods , 1995 .

[53]  P. Shrivastava.  Ecocentric Management for a Risk Society , 1995 .

[54]  Frederick H. Buttel,et al.  Rational Ecology: Environment and Political Economy. , 1987 .

[55]  David Ehrenfeld,et al.  The arrogance of humanism , 1978 .

[56]  Bodo B. Schlegelmilch,et al.  Measuring ecological concern: A multi‐construct perspective , 1993 .

[57]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations and Empirical Evidence , 1980 .

[58]  Gerhard Scherhorn,et al.  Consumers' concern about the environment and its impact on business , 1993 .