Patient referral by telemedicine: effectiveness and cost analysis of an intranet system

The clinical effectiveness and costs of telemedicine in improving the referral process from primary to secondary care were examined in an eight-month prospective, comparative study with one-year follow-up. The internal-medicine outpatient clinics of two Finnish district hospitals were compared - Peijas Hospital (PH) with telemedicine and Hyvinkää Hospital (HH) without it. The three primary-care centres studied referred a total of 292 adult patients to the outpatient clinics. The population-based number of referrals to PH (7.5/1000) from primary-care centres was twice that to HH (3.8/1000). Thirty-seven per cent of referrals to PH included requests from general practitioners for on-line medical advice (teleconsultation). Forty-three per cent of the total number of intranet referrals resulted in outpatient visits at PH, compared with 79% in the outpatient clinic at HH. Only 18% of the patients receiving a teleconsultation ended up in the outpatient department of PH within one year. These visits were mainly due to progression of chronic disease. No deaths or missed diagnoses could be attributed to telemedicine, but one diagnosis was delayed. The direct costs of an outpatient clinic visit in internal medicine (EU211) were seven times greater per patient than for an email consultation (EU32), with a marginal cost decrease of EU179 for every new intranet consultation. A cost-minimization analysis of the alternative interventions showed a net benefit of EU7876 in favour of the teleconsultation process. General practitioners sought an outpatient visit for 130 of their patients, and advice only for another 77. On-line advice was nonetheless given in 108 cases, and only 88 patient visits were arranged. Eleven referrals were declined. The cost difference between giving on-line medical advice for the 108 cases and a visit to the outpatient clinic for the other 88 was less costly (by EU4140) than investigating the 124 patients whose original clinic referrals to the PH were not declined. Productivity in the hospital increased over threefold by using email consultations instead of traditional outpatient visits. The wide interactive use of the intranet referral system between secondary and primary care improved clinical effectiveness, lowered direct costs, increased productivity and was cost-effective.

[1]  M. Roland,et al.  Understanding variation in rates of referral among general practitioners: are inappropriate referrals important and would guidelines help to reduce rates? , 1993, BMJ.

[2]  A Coulter,et al.  Managing demand at the interface between primary and secondary care , 1998, BMJ.

[3]  Telesurgical consultation. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[4]  P E Mazmanian,et al.  The case of Powhatan Correctional Center/Virginia Department of Corrections and Virginia Commonwealth University/Medical College of Virginia. , 1997, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[5]  D G Cook,et al.  Explaining variation in hospital admission rates between general practices: cross sectional study , 1999, BMJ.

[6]  W. Poon,et al.  The impact of teleradiology on the inter-hospital transfer of neurosurgical patients. , 1997, British journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  H. Laing,et al.  A cyberclinic in rheumatology. , 1999, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London.

[8]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[9]  B. Dowling Effect of fundholding on waiting times: database study , 1997, BMJ.

[10]  T. Lockwood,et al.  How valuable is feedback of information on hospital referral patterns? , 1993, BMJ.

[11]  Barbara Starfield,et al.  Is primary care essential? , 1994, The Lancet.

[12]  A. Brown,et al.  Telephone consultations in general practice: an additional or alternative service? , 1995, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[13]  R. Greenbaum,et al.  Towards a comprehensive telecardiology monitoring centre for community-based services , 1997, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[14]  D. Pencheon,et al.  Managing demand in general practice , 1998, BMJ.

[15]  H. Doll,et al.  Prospective study of trends in referral patterns in fundholding and non-fundholding practices in the Oxford region, 1990-4 , 1995, BMJ.

[16]  J. Dale,et al.  An Analysis of Telephone Calls to an Inner-City Accident and Emergency Department , 1996, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[17]  David Hailey,et al.  The assessment of telemedicine. General principles and a systematic review , 1999 .

[18]  G. Kuperman,et al.  Electronic communication with patients. Evaluation of distance medicine technology. , 1997, JAMA.

[19]  Martin Roland,et al.  Measuring quality of care with routine data: avoiding confusion between performance indicators and health outcomes , 1999, BMJ.

[20]  A. Coulter,et al.  Relation between general practices' outpatient referral rates and rates of elective admission to hospital. , 1990, BMJ.

[21]  P. Yellowlees,et al.  Telepsychiatry: ‘tele’ yes, but what about the ‘psychiatry’? , 1997, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[22]  J. Dover,et al.  The substitution of digital images for dermatologic physical examination. , 1997, Archives of dermatology.

[23]  P. Davis The interface between primary and secondary care. , 2001, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[24]  N. Edwards,et al.  Managing demand for secondary care services: the changing context , 1998 .

[25]  K. Harno,et al.  Telemedicine in managing demand for secondary-care services , 1999, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[26]  R Wootton,et al.  Telemedicine: a cautious welcome , 1996, BMJ.

[27]  J C Wyatt,et al.  The origin, content, and workload of e-mail consultations. , 1998, JAMA.