This paper summarizes recent numerical modeling activities investigating geological CO2 sequestration project at the Cranfield field, Mississippi, USA, performed with the commercial compositional flow simulator CMG-GEM. The oilfield was produced from the 1940’s to the 1960’s but has been the recent recipient of an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) CO2 flood. The subset of actual site operations of interest to the BEG consists of (1) an early phase, object of this paper, in which CO2 is injected into the oil-bearing reservoir (the so-called Phase II) and (2) a second phase (started on December 1, 2009) in which CO2 is injected at a high rate (>100 kt/yr for several years) in the saline aquifer down dip of the reservoir (Phase III). We present the modeling efforts related to the early phase of injection (Phase II, started in July 2008) in which CO2 is injected into the oil-bearing reservoir. The objectives of the modeling effort are to (i) to gain insights on how to approach CO2 injection modeling at the site, (ii) to match recent pressure measurements at several wells including a dedicated observation well, and (iii) to vindicate the necessity of monitoring of reservoir pressure. Its intent is not necessarily to do a full-fledged history match of the historical production period (1940’s–1960’s).
We conducted numerous repeat simulation runs to modify boundary conditions, fluid properties, and reservoir properties to match observed fluid responses to production and to injection. A good understanding of subsurface heterogeneities, and composition of the oil and gas components, and boundary conditions of the reservoir is the key to successful history matching. However, allocating the correct distribution of rock properties based on historical geophysical logs remained an area of uncertainty even as additional new data were obtained during characterization because of the complex interplay between depositional environment and strong overprint of diagenetic events. Parameters of utmost importance for a correct description of a flow field, in particular the relationship between porosity and permeability and the nature of permeability spatial variations remain uncertain as well as boundary conditions. The uncertainty was dealt with through sensitivity analyses. Ultimately, the constructed model shows a reasonable match with the data.
[1]
L. V. D. Meer,et al.
Limitations to Storage Pressure in Finite Saline Aquifers and the Effect of CO2 Solubility on Storage Pressure
,
2006
.
[2]
Lewis K. Weaver,et al.
Cranfield Field, Cranfield Unit, Basal Tuscaloosa Reservoir, Adams and Franklin Counties, Mississippi
,
1966
.
[3]
Jean-Philippe Nicot,et al.
Evaluation of large-scale CO2 storage on fresh-water sections of aquifers: An example from the Texas Gulf Coast Basin
,
2008
.
[4]
C. Tsang,et al.
Estimating maximum sustainable injection pressure during geological sequestration of CO2 using coupled fluid flow and geomechanical fault-slip analysis
,
2006
.
[5]
Bruce Frederick Kohse,et al.
Geomechanical Risk Mitigation for CO2 Sequestration in Saline Aquifers
,
2009
.
[6]
Susan D. Hovorka,et al.
Comparing carbon sequestration in an oil reservoir to sequestration in a brine formation—field study
,
2009
.
[7]
Kamy Sepehrnoori,et al.
Reservoir Simulation of CO2 Storage in Deep Saline Aquifers
,
2004
.