The use and users of scholarly e-journals: a review of log analysis studies

Purpose – To provide a review of the log analysis studies of use and users of scholarly electronic journals.Design/methodology/approach – The advantages and limitations of log analysis are described and then past studies of e‐journals' use and users that applied this methodology are critiqued. The results of these studies will be very briefly compared with some survey studies. Those aspects of online journals' use and users studies that log analysis can investigate well and those aspects that log analysis can not disclose enough information about are highlighted.Findings – The review indicates that although there is a debate about reliability of the results of log analysis, this methodology has great potential for studying online journals' use and their users' information seeking behaviour.Originality/value – This paper highlights the strengths and weaknesses of log analysis for studying digital journals and raises a couple of questions to be investigated by further studies.

[1]  Hao-Ren Ke,et al.  Exploring behavior of E-journal users in science and technology: Transaction log analysis of Elsevier's ScienceDirect OnSite in Taiwan , 2002 .

[2]  Susan Haigh,et al.  Measuring Web Site Usage: Log File Analysis , 1998 .

[3]  Tom Peters,et al.  When Smart People Fail: An Analysis of the Transaction Log of an Online Public Access Catalog. , 1989 .

[4]  Tom Peters,et al.  The history and development of transaction log analysis , 1993 .

[5]  C. Tenopir,et al.  Using and Reading Scholarly Literature. , 1999 .

[6]  Zhongdong Zhang.  Evaluating electronic journals services and monitoring their usage by means of WWW server log file analysis , 1998 .

[7]  David Nicholas,et al.  Cracking the code: web log analysis , 1999, Online Inf. Rev..

[8]  Nila A Sathe,et al.  Print versus electronic journals: a preliminary investigation into the effect of journal format on research processes. , 2002, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[9]  Peter Williams,et al.  Evaluating metrics for comparing the use of web sites: a case study of two consumer health web sites , 2002, J. Inf. Sci..

[10]  Philip M. Davis,et al.  Patterns in Electronic Journal Usage: Challenging the Composition of Geographic Consortia , 2002 .

[11]  Beth Sandore,et al.  An introduction to the special section on transaction log analysis , 1993 .

[12]  Oliver Obst.  Patterns and costs of printed and online journal usage. , 2003, Health information and libraries journal.

[13]  Ken Eason,et al.  Patterns of use of electronic journals , 2000, J. Documentation.

[14]  Stephen E. Robertson,et al.  Evaluation of online catalogues: Eliciting information from the user , 1991, Inf. Process. Manag..

[15]  Keith W. Ross,et al.  Computer networking - a top-down approach featuring the internet , 2000 .

[16]  Terttu A. K. Kortelainen,et al.  An analysis of the use of electronic journals and commercial journal article collections through the FinELib portal , 2003, Inf. Res..

[17]  Martin Kurth,et al.  The limits and limitations of transaction log analysis , 1993 .

[18]  Brian Nielsen,et al.  What They Say They Do and What They Do: Assessing Online Catalog Use Instruction through Transaction Monitoring. , 1986 .

[19]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  How Electronic Journals Are Changing Patterns of Use , 2004 .

[20]  Jeffrey Pomerantz,et al.  Electronic Scholarly Journal Publishing , 1998 .

[21]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Use and Users of Electronic Library Resources: An Overview and Analysis of Recent Research Studies , 2003 .

[22]  David Nicholas,et al.  Evaluating consumer website logs: a case study of The Times/The Sunday Times website , 2000, J. Inf. Sci..

[23]  Marthyn Borghuis,et al.  Tulip: Final Report , 2002 .

[24]  Philip M. Davis,et al.  An IP-level analysis of usage statistics for electronic journals in chemistry: Making inferences about user behavior , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[25]  David Nicholas,et al.  Micro-Mining and Segmented Log File Analysis: A Method for Enriching the Data Yield from Internet Log Files , 2003, J. Inf. Sci..

[26]  David W.H. Walton,et al.  Scientific Publications – Free For All? , 2004, Antarctic Science.

[27]  Peter Williams,et al.  Establishing metrics for the evaluation of touch screen kiosks , 2001, J. Inf. Sci..

[28]  Paola Gargiulo.  Electronic journals and users: the CIBER experience in Italy , 2003 .

[29]  David Nicholas,et al.  Scholarly journal usage: the results of deep log analysis , 2005, J. Documentation.

[30]  Kate Worlock.  Electronic journals: user realities — the truth about content usage among the STM community , 2002, Learn. Publ..

[31]  Anthony Watkinson,et al.  Digital journals, Big Deals and online searching behaviour: a pilot study , 2003, Aslib Proc..

[32]  Hamid R. Jamali,et al.  The users of digital scholarly journals and their information seeking behavior: What usage data and deep log analysis can disclose , 2005 .

[33]  Rob Kling,et al.  Electronic journals, the Internet, and scholarly communication , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[34]  Ann Apps,et al.  Studying E-Journal User Behavior Using Log Files , 2000 .

[35]  Philip M. Davis.  For Electronic Journals, Total Downloads Can Predict Number of Users , 2004 .

[36]  Philip M. Davis.  Information-seeking behavior of chemists: A transaction log analysis of referral URLs , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[37]  Elka Tenner,et al.  End-User Acceptance of Electronic Journals , 2000 .

[38]  Paul A. Watters,et al.  Evaluating Internet information services in the Asia-Pacific region , 1998, Internet Res..

[39]  Kathleen Bauer.  Who goes there? Measuring library web site usage , 2000 .