Modeling analysis of primary controls on net ecosystem productivity of seven boreal and temperate coniferous forests across a continental transect

Process-based models are effective tools to synthesize and/or extrapolate measured carbon (C) exchanges from individual sites to large scales. In this study, we used a C- and nitrogen (N)-cycle coupled ecosystem model named CN-CLASS (Carbon Nitrogen-Canadian Land Surface Scheme) to study the role of primary climatic controls and site-specific C stocks on the net ecosystem productivity (NEP) of seven intermediate-aged to mature coniferous forest sites across an east–west continental transect in Canada. The model was parameterized using a common set of parameters, except for two used in empirical canopy conductance–assimilation, and leaf area–sapwood relationships, and then validated using observed eddy covariance flux data. Leaf Rubisco-N dynamics that are associated with soil–plant N cycling, and depend on canopy temperature, enabled the model to simulate site-specific gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) reasonably well for all seven sites. Overall GEP simulations had relatively smaller differences compared with observations vs. ecosystem respiration (RE), which was the sum of many plant and soil components with larger variability and/or uncertainty associated with them. Both observed and simulated data showed that, on an annual basis, boreal forest sites were either carbon-neutral or a weak C sink, ranging from 30 to 180 g C m−2 yr−1; while temperate forests were either a medium or strong C sink, ranging from 150 to 500 g C m−2 yr−1, depending on forest age and climatic regime. Model sensitivity tests illustrated that air temperature, among climate variables, and aboveground biomass, among major C stocks, were dominant factors impacting annual NEP. Vegetation biomass effects on annual GEP, RE and NEP showed similar patterns of variability at four boreal and three temperate forests. Air temperature showed different impacts on GEP and RE, and the response varied considerably from site to site. Higher solar radiation enhanced GEP, while precipitation differences had a minor effect. Magnitude of forest litter content and soil organic matter (SOM) affected RE. SOM also affected GEP, but only at low levels of SOM, because of low N mineralization that limited soil nutrient (N) availability. The results of this study will help to evaluate the impact of future climatic changes and/or forest C stock variations on C uptake and loss in forest ecosystems growing in diverse environments.

[1]  Denis Loustau,et al.  Carbon balance of coniferous forests growing in contrasting climates: model-based analysis , 2005 .

[2]  S. Rodermel,et al.  Photosynthesis, Rubisco Activity and Amount, and Their Regulation by Transcription in Senescing Soybean Leaves , 1993, Plant physiology.

[3]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Seasonal variation of carbon dioxide exchange rates above and below a boreal jack pine forest , 1997 .

[4]  Beniamino Gioli,et al.  The CarboEurope regional experiment strategy , 2006 .

[5]  E. Sayer Using experimental manipulation to assess the roles of leaf litter in the functioning of forest ecosystems , 2005, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[6]  J. Means,et al.  Assessing alternative allometric algorithms for estimating leaf area of Douglas-fir trees and stands. , 2000 .

[7]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Carbon and energy exchange by a black spruce – moss ecosystem under changing climate: testing the mathematical model ecosys with data from the BOREAS experiment , 2001 .

[8]  P. Ciais,et al.  Net carbon dioxide losses of northern ecosystems in response to autumn warming , 2008, Nature.

[9]  Denis Loustau,et al.  Temperature response of parameters of a biochemically based model of photosynthesis. II. A review of experimental data , 2002 .

[10]  X. Lee,et al.  Overview of ChinaFLUX and evaluation of its eddy covariance measurement , 2006 .

[11]  T. Andrew Black,et al.  Carbon dioxide fluxes in coastal Douglas-fir stands at different stages of development after clearcut harvesting , 2006 .

[12]  Ari Nissinen,et al.  Evaluation of six process‐based forest growth models using eddy‐covariance measurements of CO2 and H2O fluxes at six forest sites in Europe , 2002 .

[13]  T. A. Black,et al.  Comparison of carbon dioxide fluxes over three boreal black spruce forests in Canada , 2007 .

[14]  I. E. Woodrow,et al.  A Model Predicting Stomatal Conductance and its Contribution to the Control of Photosynthesis under Different Environmental Conditions , 1987 .

[15]  Ray Leuning,et al.  Temperature dependence of two parameters in a photosynthesis model , 2002 .

[16]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  The likely impact of elevated [CO2], nitrogen deposition, increased temperature and management on carbon sequestration in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems: a literature review. , 2007, The New phytologist.

[17]  M. R. R A U Pa C H,et al.  Model – data synthesis in terrestrial carbon observation : methods , data requirements and data uncertainty specifications , 2005 .

[18]  D. Verseghy,et al.  CLASS-A Canadian Land Surface Scheme for GCMs , 1993 .

[19]  D. Verseghy,et al.  Class—A Canadian land surface scheme for GCMS. I. Soil model , 2007 .

[20]  T. A. Black,et al.  Intercomparison of techniques to model water stress effects on CO2 and energy exchange in temperate and boreal deciduous forests , 2006 .

[21]  Oliver Sonnentag,et al.  Leaf area index measurements at Fluxnet-Canada forest sites , 2006 .

[22]  M. A. Arain,et al.  Net ecosystem production in a temperate pine plantation in southeastern Canada , 2005 .

[23]  A. G. Barr,et al.  Response of Net Ecosystem Productivity of Three Boreal Forest Stands to Drought , 2005, Ecosystems.

[24]  Y. Cen,et al.  The Regulation of Rubisco Activity in Response to Variation in Temperature and Atmospheric CO2 Partial Pressure in Sweet Potato1[w] , 2005, Plant Physiology.

[25]  T. A. Black,et al.  Energy and water exchanges modulated by soil–plant nitrogen cycling in a temperate Pacific Northwest conifer forest , 2007 .

[26]  R. Valentini,et al.  A new assessment of European forests carbon exchanges by eddy fluxes and artificial neural network spatialization , 2003 .

[27]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Nitrogen Controls on Climate Model Evapotranspiration , 2002 .

[28]  Jing M. Chen,et al.  Intercomparison of techniques to model high temperature effects on CO2 and energy exchange in temperate and boreal coniferous forests , 2005 .

[29]  Weikai Yan,et al.  An Equation for Modelling the Temperature Response of Plants using only the Cardinal Temperatures , 1999 .

[30]  S. Trumbore Carbon respired by terrestrial ecosystems – recent progress and challenges , 2006 .

[31]  Shusen Wang,et al.  Modelling plant carbon and nitrogen dynamics of a boreal aspen forest in CLASS — the Canadian Land Surface Scheme , 2001 .

[32]  Lawrence B. Flanagan,et al.  The Fluxnet-Canada Research Network: Influence of climate and disturbance on carbon cycling in forests and peatlands , 2006 .

[33]  E. Falge,et al.  Comparison of surface energy exchange models with eddy flux data in forest and grassland ecosystems of Germany , 2005 .

[34]  S. Trumbore,et al.  Moss and soil contributions to the annual net carbon flux of a maturing boreal forest , 1997 .

[35]  T. Black,et al.  Inter-annual variability in the leaf area index of a boreal aspen-hazelnut forest in relation to net ecosystem production , 2004 .

[36]  T. A. Black,et al.  Late-summer carbon fluxes from Canadian forests and peatlands along an east-west continental transect , 2006 .

[37]  John Moncrieff,et al.  Seasonal variation of carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy exchanges of a boreal black spruce forest , 1997 .

[38]  Robert Clement,et al.  On the validation of models of forest CO2 exchange using eddy covariance data: some perils and pitfalls. , 2005, Tree physiology.

[39]  F. Hall,et al.  BOREAS TE-1 SSA Soil Lab Data , 2000 .

[40]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  FLUXNET and modelling the global carbon cycle , 2007 .

[41]  T. Griffisa,et al.  Ecophysiological controls on the carbon balances of three southern boreal forests , 2003 .

[42]  S. Long,et al.  Review Tansley Review , 2022 .

[43]  Ü. Rannik,et al.  Gap filling strategies for defensible annual sums of net ecosystem exchange , 2001 .

[44]  John M. Norman,et al.  Carbon distribution and aboveground net primary production in aspen, jack pine, and black spruce stands in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Canada , 1997 .

[45]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Energy and CO(2) flux densities above and below a temperate broad-leaved forest and a boreal pine forest. , 1996, Tree physiology.

[46]  S. Long,et al.  What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. , 2004, The New phytologist.

[47]  Allison L. Dunn,et al.  A long‐term record of carbon exchange in a boreal black spruce forest: means, responses to interannual variability, and decadal trends , 2007 .

[48]  R. Hanley,et al.  Artificial neural network application for multi-ecosystem carbon flux simulation , 2005 .

[49]  T. A. Black,et al.  Soil-plant nitrogen cycling modulated carbon exchanges in a western temperate conifer forest in Canada , 2006 .

[50]  Y. Zhangb,et al.  Intercomparison of techniques to model water stress effects on CO 2 and energy exchange in temperate and boreal deciduous forests , 2006 .

[51]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  Comparing and evaluating process‐based ecosystem model predictions of carbon and water fluxes in major European forest biomes , 2005, Global change biology.

[52]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Belowground and aboveground biomass in young postfire lodgepole pine forests of contrasting tree density , 2003 .

[53]  M. Dennett,et al.  Use of the Expolinear Growth Model to Analyse the Growth of Faba bean, Peas and Lentils at Three Densities: Fitting the Model , 1998 .

[54]  Darrel L. Williams,et al.  BOREAS in 1997: Experiment overview, scientific results, and future directions , 1997 .

[55]  E. Pesavento What Have We Learned ? , 2006 .

[56]  T. A. Black,et al.  Photosynthetic light use efficiency of three biomes across an east–west continental-scale transect in Canada , 2006 .

[57]  M. Adams,et al.  Evergreen trees do not maximize instantaneous photosynthesis. , 2004, Trends in plant science.

[58]  Matthias Peichl,et al.  Above- and belowground ecosystem biomass and carbon pools in an age-sequence of temperate pine plantation forests , 2006 .

[59]  T. A. Black,et al.  Sensitivity and uncertainty of the carbon balance of a Pacific Northwest Douglas-fir forest during an El Niño/La Niña cycle , 2004 .

[60]  T. A. Black,et al.  Effects of seasonal and interannual climate variability on net ecosystem productivity of boreal deciduous and conifer forests , 2002 .

[61]  Ü. Rannik,et al.  Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of forests: the EUROFLUX methodology , 2000 .

[62]  Arana,et al.  Progress in Photosynthesis Research , 1987, Springer Netherlands.

[63]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  A multiyear evaluation of a Dynamic Global Vegetation Model at three AmeriFlux forest sites: Vegetation structure, phenology, soil temperature, and CO2 and H2O vapor exchange , 2006 .

[64]  W. Oechel,et al.  FLUXNET: A New Tool to Study the Temporal and Spatial Variability of Ecosystem-Scale Carbon Dioxide, Water Vapor, and Energy Flux Densities , 2001 .

[65]  C. Bourque,et al.  Carbon and biomass partitioning in balsam fir (Abies balsamea). , 2005, Tree physiology.

[66]  EK VIV,et al.  A parameterization of leaf phenology for the terrestrial ecosystem component of climate models , 2004 .