Three-Dimensional Camouflage: Exploiting Photons to Conceal Form

Many animals have a gradation of body color, termed “countershading,” where the areas that are typically exposed to more light are darker. One hypothesis is that this patterning enhances visual camouflage by making the retinal image of the animal match that of the background, a fundamentally two-dimensional theory. More controversially, countershading may also obliterate cues to three-dimensional (3D) shape delivered by shading. Despite relying on distinct cognitive mechanisms, these two potential functions hitherto have been amalgamated in the literature. It has previously not been possible to validate either hypothesis empirically, because there has been no general theory of optimal countershading that allows quantitative predictions to be made about the many environmental parameters involved. Here we unpack the logical distinction between using countershading for background matching and using it to obliterate 3D shape. We use computational modeling to determine the optimal coloration for the camouflage of 3D shape. Our model of 3D concealment is derived from the physics of light and informed by perceptual psychology: we simulate a 3D world that incorporates naturalistic lighting environments. The model allows us to predict countershading coloration for terrestrial environments, for any body shape and a wide range of ecologically relevant parameters. The approach can be generalized to any light distribution, including those underwater.

[1]  Astrid M L Kappers,et al.  The Influence of Illumination Direction on the Pictorial Reliefs of Lambertian Surfaces , 2005, Perception.

[2]  S. Johnsen Hide and seek in the open sea: pelagic camouflage and visual countermeasures. , 2014, Annual review of marine science.

[3]  W. Epstein,et al.  Perception of space and motion , 1995 .

[4]  A. Thayer,et al.  Concealing-coloration in the animal kingdom : an exposition of the laws of disguise through color and pattern being a summary of Abbott H. Thayer's discoveries , 1909 .

[5]  E. Poulton The colours of animals: Their meaning and use: Especially considered in the case of insects , 2009 .

[6]  Muhammad A. J. Qadri,et al.  Shape from shading in pigeons , 2012, Cognition.

[7]  A. Wallace Darwinism : an exposition of the theory of natural selection, with some of its applications / by Alfred Russel Wallace. , 1889 .

[8]  William L. Allen,et al.  A Quantitative Test of the Predicted Relationship between Countershading and Lighting Environment , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[9]  Julie M. Harris,et al.  Optimal integration of shading and binocular disparity for depth perception. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[10]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Disruptive coloration, crypsis and edge detection in early visual processing , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  M. Huynen,et al.  Disruptive coloration and background pattern matching , 2005, Nature.

[12]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[13]  S. Johnsen Cryptic and conspicuous coloration in the pelagic environment , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Leo J. Fleishman,et al.  Illumination geometry, detector position and the objective determination of animal signal colours in natural light , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  Yehezkel Yeshurun,et al.  Convexity-Based Visual Camouflage Breaking , 2001, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[16]  Stephanie Boehm,et al.  Animal Camouflage Mechanisms And Function , 2016 .

[17]  Hannah M. Rowland From Abbott Thayer to the present day: what have we learned about the function of countershading? , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  Roger Hanlon,et al.  Cephalopod dynamic camouflage , 2007, Current Biology.

[19]  A. Thayer The Law Which Underlies Protective Coloration , 1896 .

[20]  D. Knill Contour into texture: information content of surface contours and texture flow. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[21]  Julie M. Harris,et al.  Binocular vision: moving closer to reality , 2004, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[22]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Chapter 3 – Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances: The Integration, Relative Potency, and Contextual Use of Different Information about Depth* , 1995 .

[23]  William Curran,et al.  The effect of Illuminant position on perceived curvature , 1996, Vision Research.

[24]  Justine J Allen,et al.  Comparative morphology of changeable skin papillae in octopus and cuttlefish , 2014, Journal of morphology.

[25]  J. Endler The Color of Light in Forests and Its Implications , 1993 .