Role of the Laboratory in the Diagnosis of Viral Exanthems~!2009-11-20~!2009-11-25~!2010-02-16~!

An important number of viruses (measles, rubella, human parvovirus B19, herpes simplex, varicella zoster, en- teroviruses, dengue and others) can cause exanthematic diseases. Laboratory diagnosis of exanthems due to viral infec- tions include the identification of the disease-causing virus (isolation, antigen detection or nucleic acid detection) and the determination of a specific serological response (seroconversion or specific IgM). The aim of virus isolation is the recovering of infectious viruses, being useful for molecular epidemiological studies. It is of application for measles, rubella, enterovirus, herpes simplex and varicella-zoster. However, due to its methodological complications, it is not of application in most laboratories. For some viruses, isolation is not practical, because there is no cell substrate available (Epstein-Barr, parvovirus B19). An alternative to viral isolation is the detection of antigens on clinical specimens (dengue). Thirdly, nucleic acid detection is a very useful approach for diagnosing viral exanthems, spe- cially when multiplex assays recognising measles, rubella and parvovirus B19, or enterovirus and herpesvirus, are used. The best tool for the serological diagnosis is the detection of IgM, since it provides a rapid diagnosis during the first days of the disease. However it has some drawbacks when used to diagnose viral rashes (the presence of rheumatoid factor and specific IgG; the multiple reactivity due to polyclonal stimulation of memory lymphocytes; the cross-reactivity between viruses causing a similar clinical picture; the IgM synthesis in herpesvirus reactivations). In such cases, confirmatory serological approaches (establishment of seroprofiles, or avidity assays) are necessary. Both direct and indirect methods must be considered as complementary and the results obtained for each one should be evaluated in the context of the clinical profile and epidemiological history.

[1]  B. Lina,et al.  Multicenter evaluation of the ENTEROVIRUS R-gene real-time RT-PCR assay for the detection of enteroviruses in clinical specimens. , 2009, Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology.

[2]  H. Zeller,et al.  Simultaneous detection and quantitation of Chikungunya, dengue and West Nile viruses by multiplex RT-PCR assays and dengue virus typing using high resolution melting. , 2009, Journal of virological methods.

[3]  G. Comach,et al.  Evaluation of dengue NS1 antigen detection tests with acute sera from patients infected with dengue virus in Venezuela. , 2009, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[4]  R. López-Vélez,et al.  Molecular and serologic markers of acute dengue infection in naive and flavivirus-vaccinated travelers. , 2009, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[5]  K. Schmader,et al.  A real‐time PCR assay to identify and discriminate among wild‐type and vaccine strains of varicella‐zoster virus and herpes simplex virus in clinical specimens, and comparison with the clinical diagnoses , 2009, Journal of medical virology.

[6]  M. Tashiro,et al.  Development of an assay for the detection and quantification of the measles virus nucleoprotein (N) gene using real-time reverse transcriptase PCR. , 2009, Journal of medical microbiology.

[7]  W. J. McBride Evaluation of dengue NS1 test kits for the diagnosis of dengue fever. , 2009, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[8]  Y. Yamauchi,et al.  Multiplex real‐time PCR for the simultaneous detection of herpes simplex virus, human herpesvirus 6, and human herpesvirus 7 , 2009, Microbiology and immunology.

[9]  J. Echevarría,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis of Rubella Virus Strains from an Outbreak in Madrid, Spain, from 2004 to 2005 , 2008, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[10]  J. Hübschen,et al.  A multiplex TaqMan PCR assay for the detection of measles and rubella virus. , 2008, Journal of virological methods.

[11]  A. Vaheri,et al.  IgM and avidity of IgG antibodies in primary HHV-6 infections , 2008, Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases.

[12]  J. Stockman Acute Human Parvovirus B-19 Infection in Hospitalized Children: A Serologic and Molecular Survey , 2008 .

[13]  K. Brown,et al.  Development and evaluation of a real‐time PCR assay for rapid identification and semi‐quantitation of measles virus , 2007, Journal of medical virology.

[14]  Koichiro Yamada,et al.  Quantitation of human parvovirus B19 DNA by real‐time polymerase chain reaction , 2007, Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society.

[15]  D. Samuel,et al.  Evaluation of a commercial rubella IgM assay for use on oral fluid samples for diagnosis and surveillance of congenital rubella syndrome and postnatal rubella. , 2006, Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology.

[16]  D. Navarro,et al.  Concurrent detection of human herpesvirus type 6 and measles‐specific IgMs during acute exanthematic human parvovirus B19 infection , 2006, Journal of medical virology.

[17]  Hong Wang,et al.  Establishment and application of a TaqMan real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay for rubella virus RNA. , 2006, Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica.

[18]  F. D. Ory,et al.  Estudio del rendimiento diagnóstico de la detección de IgM específica y de la amplificación genómica de rubéola , 2006 .

[19]  J. Echevarría,et al.  [Diagnostic performance of specific IgM detection and genomic amplification in rubella]. , 2006, Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica.

[20]  J. Echevarría,et al.  Evaluation of Diagnostic Markers for Measles Virus Infection in the Context of an Outbreak in Spain , 2005, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[21]  M. Motz,et al.  Human parvovirus B19 serology and avidity using a combination of recombinant antigens enables a differentiated picture of the current state of infection. , 2005, Journal of veterinary medicine. B, Infectious diseases and veterinary public health.

[22]  C. Birch,et al.  Applicability of Oral Fluid Collected onto Filter Paper for Detection and Genetic Characterization of Measles Virus Strains , 2005, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[23]  S. Goldenberg,et al.  Dengue virus infections: comparison of methods for diagnosing the acute disease. , 2005, Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology.

[24]  C. Baas,et al.  Estimation of the number of infectious measles viruses in live virus vaccines using quantitative real-time PCR. , 2004, Journal of virological methods.

[25]  F. Lahulla,et al.  Use of whole blood dried on filter paper for detection and genotyping of measles virus. , 2004, Journal of virological methods.

[26]  C. Pannuti,et al.  Use of an Immunoglobulin G Avidity Test To Discriminate between Primary and Secondary Dengue Virus Infections , 2004, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[27]  T. Wreghitt,et al.  Cytomegalovirus infection in immunocompetent patients. , 2003, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[28]  D. Brown,et al.  Detection of Low-Avidity Immunoglobulin G in Oral Fluid Samples: New Approach for Rubella Diagnosis and Surveillance , 2003, Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology.

[29]  M. Ogilvie Molecular techniques should not now replace cell culture in diagnostic virology laboratories , 2001, Reviews in medical virology.

[30]  N. Andrews,et al.  Development and evaluation of an antibody capture ELISA for detection of IgG to Epstein-Barr virus in oral fluid samples. , 2001, Journal of virological methods.

[31]  Y. Yanagi,et al.  V Domain of Human SLAM (CDw150) Is Essential for Its Function as a Measles Virus Receptor , 2001, Journal of Virology.

[32]  J. Echevarría,et al.  Simultaneous Detection of Measles Virus , Rubella Virus , and Parvovirus B 19 by Using Multiplex PCR Marı́a , 2001 .

[33]  A. Wynne,et al.  Simultaneous IgM reactivity by EIA against more than one virus in measles, parvovirus B19 and rubella infection. , 1999, Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology.

[34]  A. Tenório,et al.  Detection of enteroviral RNA and specific DNA of herpesviruses by multiplex genome amplification. , 1997, Journal of virological methods.

[35]  H. Kikuta,et al.  Immunoglobulin G avidity testing in serum and cerebrospinal fluid for analysis of measles virus infection , 1996, Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology.

[36]  I. Casas,et al.  Application of fluoroimmunoassay to the identification of low avidity specific IgG against pathogenic human viruses and Toxoplasma gondii. , 1995, Clinical and diagnostic virology.

[37]  M. Lappalainen,et al.  Avidity of IgG in serodiagnosis of infectious diseases , 1993 .

[38]  J. Echevarría,et al.  Application of low-avidity immunoglobulin G studies to diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infectious mononucleosis , 1993, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[39]  H. Thomas,et al.  Persistent rubella‐specific IgM reactivity in the absence of recent primary rubella and rubella reinfection , 1992, Journal of medical virology.

[40]  K. Hedman,et al.  RUBELLA INFECTION AND REINFECTION DISTINGUISHED BY AVIDITY OF IgG , 1988, The Lancet.

[41]  J. Melnick,et al.  Lyophilized combination pools of enterovirus equine antisera: new LBM pools prepared from reserves of antisera stored frozen for two decades. , 1985, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[42]  F. Fenner Viruses and the immune response. , 1972, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.