Face-to-Face Versus Computer-Mediated Communication: A Synthesis of the Experimental Literature
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Asch. Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. , 1956 .
[2] Ederyn Williams,et al. Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. , 1977 .
[3] Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al. The evolution of user behavior in a computerized conferencing system , 1981, CACM.
[4] Ralph L. Rosnow,et al. Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis , 1984 .
[5] Sara Kiesler,et al. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .
[6] Sara B. Kiesler,et al. Affect in Computer-Meditated Communication: An Experiment in Synchronous Terminal-to-Terminal Discussion , 1985, Hum. Comput. Interact..
[7] S. Kiesler,et al. Response Effects in the Electronic Survey , 1986 .
[8] M. Gordon,et al. The “Science of the Sophomore” Revisited: from Conjecture to Empiricism , 1986 .
[9] D. O. Sears. College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. , 1986 .
[10] S. Kiesler,et al. Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .
[11] S. R. Hiltz,et al. Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. , 1986 .
[12] R. Daft,et al. Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations , 1987 .
[13] S. Kiesler,et al. Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. , 1987 .
[14] M. Markus,et al. Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .
[15] Mark P. Zanna,et al. The impact of computer-mediated communication on self-awareness☆ , 1988 .
[16] Michael Smilowitz,et al. The Effects of Computer Mediated Communication on an Individual's Judgment: A Study Based on the Methods of Asch's Social Influence Experiment , 1988 .
[17] Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al. Experiments in group decision making, 3: disinhibition, deindividuation, and group process in pen name and real name computer conferences , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..
[18] M. Zanna,et al. Persuasion as a function of self-awareness in computer-mediated communication , 1989 .
[19] Ronald E. Rice,et al. Computer-Mediated Communication System Network Data: Theoretical Concerns and Empirical Examples , 1990, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..
[20] George P. Huber,et al. A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence , 1990 .
[21] Amin Rajan,et al. In the age of the smart machine , 1990 .
[22] J. Walther,et al. Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction , 1990 .
[23] Jay F. Nunamaker,et al. Implementing Electronic Meeting Systems at IBM: Lessons Learned and Success Factors , 1990, MIS Q..
[24] A. Pinsonneault,et al. The effects of electronic meetings on group processes and outcomes: An assessment of the empirical research , 1990 .
[25] Thomas A. Finholt,et al. Electronic Groups at Work. , 1990 .
[26] L. Adrianson,et al. Group processes in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication , 1991 .
[27] Russell Spears,et al. Computer-Mediated Communication, De-Individuation and Group Decision-Making , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..
[28] R. Kling,et al. Book Review: Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices , 1991 .
[29] Sara B. Kiesler,et al. The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..
[30] Lee Sproull,et al. Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .
[31] Larry E. Penley,et al. Communication Abilities of Managers: The Relationship to Performance , 1991 .
[32] S. Kiesler,et al. Group decision making and communication technology , 1992 .
[33] Jay F. Nunamaker,et al. ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .
[34] S. Weisband. Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups , 1992 .
[35] Tim O'Shea,et al. 'Flaming' in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications. , 1992 .
[36] Helen Z. Margetts,et al. Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices , 1993, J. Inf. Technol..
[37] Bonita L. Daly,et al. The influence of face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication channels on collective induction , 1993 .
[38] S. Wheelan. Group Processes: A Developmental Perspective , 1993 .
[39] Maureen S. Battistella,et al. Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .
[40] Izak Benbasat,et al. Empirical Research in Managerial Support Systems: A Review and Assessment , 1993 .
[41] J. McGrath,et al. Group Task Performance and Communication Technology , 1993 .
[42] R. Woodman,et al. Organizational change and information technology: Managing on the edge of cyberspace , 1994 .
[43] Giuseppe Mantovani,et al. Is Computer-Mediated Communication Intrinsically Apt to Enhance Democracy in Organizations? , 1994 .
[44] E-mail and the New Epistolary Age , 1994 .
[45] Susan G. Straus,et al. Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.
[46] Terri L. Griffith,et al. Distinguishing Between the Forest and the Trees: Media, Features, and Methodology in Electronic Communication Research , 1994 .
[47] R. Brent Gallupe,et al. Blocking electronic brainstorms. , 1994 .
[48] Christopher B. Sullivan,et al. Preferences for Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication Tasks , 1995 .