Probing the Limits of Genetic Recoding in Essential Genes

Changing the Code Easily and efficiently expanding the genetic code could provide tools to genome engineers with broad applications in medicine, energy, agriculture, and environmental safety. Lajoie et al. (p. 357) replaced all known UAG stop codons with synonymous UAA stop codons in Escherichia coli MG1655, as well as release factor 1 (RF1; terminates translation at UAG), thereby eliminating natural UAG translation function without impairing fitness. This made it possible to reassign UAG as a dedicated codon to genetically encode nonstandard amino acids while avoiding deleterious incorporation at native UAG positions. The engineered E. coli incorporated nonstandard amino acids into its proteins and showed enhanced resistance to bacteriophage T7. In a second paper, Lajoie et al. (p. 361) demonstrated the recoding of 13 codons in 42 highly expressed essential genes in E. coli. Codon usage was malleable, but synonymous codons occasionally were nonequivalent in unpredictable ways. Thirteen codons could be removed from all essential ribosomal protein-coding genes across 80 Escherichia coli strains. Engineering radically altered genetic codes will allow for genomically recoded organisms that have expanded chemical capabilities and are isolated from nature. We have previously reassigned the translation function of the UAG stop codon; however, reassigning sense codons poses a greater challenge because such codons are more prevalent, and their usage regulates gene expression in ways that are difficult to predict. To assess the feasibility of radically altering the genetic code, we selected a panel of 42 highly expressed essential genes for modification. Across 80 Escherichia coli strains, we removed all instances of 13 rare codons from these genes and attempted to shuffle all remaining codons. Our results suggest that the genome-wide removal of 13 codons is feasible; however, several genome design constraints were apparent, underscoring the importance of a strategy that rapidly prototypes and tests many designs in small pieces.

[1]  Nicholas T. Ingolia,et al.  Genome-Wide Analysis in Vivo of Translation with Nucleotide Resolution Using Ribosome Profiling , 2009, Science.

[2]  A. Millar,et al.  The N-terminal cleavable extension of plant carrier proteins is responsible for efficient insertion into the inner mitochondrial membrane. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  Sriram Kosuri,et al.  Scalable gene synthesis by selective amplification of DNA pools from high-fidelity microchips , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  D. Court,et al.  An efficient recombination system for chromosome engineering in Escherichia coli. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Thomas H Segall-Shapiro,et al.  Creation of a Bacterial Cell Controlled by a Chemically Synthesized Genome , 2010, Science.

[6]  Cynthia L. Sagers,et al.  The Establishment of Genetically Engineered Canola Populations in the U.S. , 2011, PloS one.

[7]  A. Ishihama,et al.  Enhancement of +1 Frameshift by Polyamines during Translation of Polypeptide Release Factor 2 in Escherichia coli* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  George M. Church,et al.  Improving Lambda Red Genome Engineering in Escherichia coli via Rational Removal of Endogenous Nucleases , 2012, PloS one.

[9]  Masaru Tomita,et al.  Deep sequencing reveals as-yet-undiscovered small RNAs in Escherichia coli , 2011, BMC Genomics.

[10]  D. G. Gibson,et al.  Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases , 2009, Nature Methods.

[11]  George M Church,et al.  Towards synthesis of a minimal cell , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[12]  Milana Frenkel-Morgenstern,et al.  Genes adopt non-optimal codon usage to generate cell cycle-dependent oscillations in protein levels , 2012, Molecular systems biology.

[13]  B. Bainbridge,et al.  Genetics , 1981, Experientia.

[14]  Peter G. Schultz,et al.  Genomically Recoded Organisms Expand Biological Functions , 2013, Science.

[15]  R. Zell,et al.  DNA mismatch‐repair in Escherichia coli counteracting the hydrolytic deamination of 5‐methyl‐cytosine residues. , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[16]  Farren J. Isaacs,et al.  Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution , 2009, Nature.

[17]  Y. Pilpel,et al.  An Evolutionarily Conserved Mechanism for Controlling the Efficiency of Protein Translation , 2010, Cell.

[18]  Sigal Ben-Yehuda,et al.  Translation-Independent Localization of mRNA in E. coli , 2011, Science.

[19]  E. Angov.  Codon usage: Nature's roadmap to expression and folding of proteins , 2011, Biotechnology journal.

[20]  Judith Frydman,et al.  Evolutionary conservation of codon optimality reveals hidden signatures of co-translational folding , 2012, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[21]  D. Reich,et al.  Cost-effective, high-throughput DNA sequencing libraries for multiplexed target capture , 2012, Genome research.

[22]  Dieter Söll,et al.  Natural expansion of the genetic code. , 2007, Nature chemical biology.

[23]  J. Williamson,et al.  Quantitation of the ribosomal protein autoregulatory network using mass spectrometry. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[24]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]／Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[25]  Farren J. Isaacs,et al.  Enhanced multiplex genome engineering through co-operative oligonucleotide co-selection , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[26]  D. Helinski,et al.  Purification and characterization of colicin E1. , 1971, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[27]  M. Bulmer.  The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. , 1991, Genetics.

[28]  M. Kaczanowska,et al.  Ribosome Biogenesis and the Translation Process in Escherichia coli , 2007, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[29]  B. Wanner,et al.  One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Gene-Wei Li,et al.  The anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequence drives translational pausing and codon choice in bacteria , 2012, Nature.

[31]  Farren J. Isaacs,et al.  Precise Manipulation of Chromosomes in Vivo Enables Genome-Wide Codon Replacement , 2011, Science.

[32]  Peter G Schultz,et al.  Adding new chemistries to the genetic code. , 2010, Annual review of biochemistry.

[33]  J. Elf,et al.  Over expression of a tRNA(Leu) isoacceptor changes charging pattern of leucine tRNAs and reveals new codon reading. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  H. Akashi.  Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy. , 1994, Genetics.

[35]  Y. Pilpel,et al.  Determinants of translation efficiency and accuracy , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[36]  Yukiko Yamazaki,et al.  Profiling of Escherichia coli Chromosome database. , 2008, Methods in molecular biology.

[37]  J Craig Venter,et al.  Chemical synthesis of the mouse mitochondrial genome , 2010, Nature Methods.

[38]  J. Plotkin,et al.  Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[39]  R. Rosenfeld.  Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.