Auditory nerve terminals in the cochlear nucleus magnocellularis: Differences between low and high frequencies

Primary auditory nerve fibers were labelled in the barn owl by localized horseradish peroxidase (HRP) injections into the cochlear nucleus angularis. They were followed to their terminal sites in the hearing organ (basilar papilla), confirming that they were auditory, and to the cochlear nucleus magnocellularis. The terminal sites of low‐frequency fibers within nucleus magnocellularis always included an area previously described as the lagenar part, i.e., an area receiving primary input which is probably only vestibular. Furthermore, a number of differences were recognized between these low‐frequency (up to 0.64 kHz) and the high‐frequency (1.8 kHz and above) auditory nerve projections to nucleus magnocellularis. Most importantly, the collaterals given off by low‐frequency fibers into the nucleus typically showed multiple terminal branching, with both en passant and terminal bouton‐like swellings. High‐frequency fiber collaterals, in contrast, terminated unbranched in a single endbulb of Held. Nucleus magnocellularis is the first station in a brainstem auditory pathway processing stimulus timing information, coded through neuronal phase locking. The prominent difference in terminal shape found between its low‐ and high‐frequency input fibers is interpreted as reflecting different requirements of the absolute temporal precision for significant phase locking. Terminals in the shape of endbulbs of Held are probably a specialization to improve the temporal precision of synaptic transmission, allowing phase locking to higher frequencies. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  T T Takahashi,et al.  Projections of the cochlear nuclei and nucleus laminaris to the inferior colliculus of the barn owl , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[2]  G. Manley,et al.  Innervation patterns and spontaneous activity of afferent fibres to the lagenar macula and apical basilar papilla of the chick's cochlea , 1991, Hearing Research.

[3]  M. Konishi,et al.  Segregation of stimulus phase and intensity coding in the cochlear nucleus of the barn owl , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  C. Carr,et al.  Central projections of auditory nerve fibers in the barn owl , 1991, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  M. Szpir,et al.  Central projections of cochlear nerve fibers in the alligator lizard , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  D. Oertel,et al.  Use of brain slices in the study of the auditory system: spatial and temporal summation of synaptic inputs in cells in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the mouse. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  T. Parks Morphology of axosomatic endings in an avian cochlear nucleus: Nucleus magnocellularis of the chicken , 1981, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  E. Rouiller,et al.  Central projections of intracellularly labeled auditory nerve fibers in cats: Morphometric correlations with physiological properties , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  R. Klinke,et al.  Origin of infrasound sensitive neurones in the papilla basilaris of the pigeon: an HRP study , 1990, Hearing Research.

[10]  M. Liberman Central projections of auditory‐nerve fibers of differing spontaneous rate. I. Anteroventral cochlear nucleus , 1991, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  E. Rouiller,et al.  The Central Projection of Intracellularly Labeled Auditory Nerve Fibers: Morphometric Relationships Between Structural and Physiological Properties , 1988 .

[12]  W E Sullivan Classification of response patterns in cochlear nucleus of barn owl: correlation with functional response properties. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Gert Stange,et al.  Temporal synchronization in the primary auditory response in the pigeon , 1989, Hearing Research.

[14]  Catherine E. Carr,et al.  Evolution of the Central Auditory System in Reptiles and Birds , 1992 .

[15]  E. Rouiller,et al.  The central projections of intracellularly labeled auditory nerve fibers in cats , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  M. Konishi,et al.  A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Fettiplace,et al.  The frequency selectivity of auditory nerve fibres and hair cells in the cochlea of the turtle , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  S. Jhaveri,et al.  Neuronal architecture in nucleus magnocellularis of the chicken auditory system with observations on nucleus laminaris: A light and electron microscope study , 1982, Neuroscience.

[19]  R. H. Browner,et al.  The nucleus magnocellularis in the red-eared turtle, Chrysemys scripta elegans: Eighth nerve endings and neuronal types , 1988, Hearing Research.

[20]  G. Manley,et al.  Quantitative morphological analysis of the sensory epithelium of the starling and pigeon basilar papilla , 1988, Hearing Research.

[21]  S. Jhaveri,et al.  Sequential alterations of neuronal architecture in nucleus magnocellularis of the developing chicken: An electron microscope study , 1982, Neuroscience.

[22]  R. L. Boord,et al.  Projection of the cochlear and lagenar nerves on the cochlear nuclei of the pigeon , 1963, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[23]  S. Jhaveri,et al.  Sequential alterations of neuronal architecture in nucleus magnocellularis of the developing chicken: A golgi study , 1982, Neuroscience.

[24]  E. Rubel,et al.  Organization and development of brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: Tonotopic organization of N. magnocellularis and N. laminaris , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.