THE SACRED AND THE LIMITS OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL FIX
暂无分享,去创建一个
Abstract. Three points are discussed: first, that limits of technological fixes are revealed by current economic, social, and environmental problems; second, that these problems cannot be solved by a technological fix but require alternative forms of activity and being; third, that realizing these limits makes possible the re-emergence of the sacred. Two attitudes toward technology, nature, and the sacred are described: Technocrats desacralize nature and strive to shape it technologically for human ends alone; pernetarians resacralize nature and develop a perennial philosophy (synthesized from elements of different spiritual disciplines) allied with an enlarged, artful science, so as to design activities compatible with nature.
[1] George Sessions,et al. The Soul of the World , 1981 .
[2] Arne Naess,et al. The shallow and the deep, long‐range ecology movement. A summary∗ , 1973 .
[3] A B Lovins,et al. Energy: the "soft path". , 1977, Science.
[4] N. Maxwell. Science, reason, knowledge, and wisdom: A critique of Specialism , 1980 .
[5] M. Zimmerman. Toward a Heideggerean Ethos for Radical Environmentalism , 1983 .