Influence of the Fascicle Length and Physiological Cross-sectional Area of M. soleus on Ankle Joint Kinetics

It is crucial for athletes and coaches to assess type of movements for which their physique (e.g., tall-and-slender or short-and-thick) is suited. This assessment is especially valuable for sports activities in which competitors are classifi ed by body mass (such as weight lifting, boxing, wrestling, judo, etc.), as the amount of muscle mass that the athletes can gain through strength training is limited in these cases. The maximal isometric force development capability of a muscle is a linear function of its physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA). The coeffi cient of the linear function is referred to "specifi c tension" (Close 1972; Fukunaga, Ito, et al., 1996). This relation can be expressed as Fisom = SPT * PCSA, where Fisom is maximal isometric force and SPT is specifi c tension. In general, the greater the PCSA is, the greater the expected isometric force development. However, when considering the mechanical output of muscles during movement, another factor, the length of muscle fascicles, exerts an important infl uence. This is due to the force-length-velocity relation of muscles (Edman 1988; Lieber 2002). When considering a situation in which the muscle volume (thus the muscle mass) is given, it is not clear which of the following is more advantageous: to have Infl uence of the Fascicle Length and Physiological Cross-sectional Area of M. soleus on Ankle Joint Kinetics

[1]  Akinori Nagano,et al.  Neuromusculoskeletal computer modeling and simulation of upright, straight-legged, bipedal locomotion of Australopithecus afarensis (A.L. 288-1). , 2005, American journal of physical anthropology.

[2]  M. Bobbert,et al.  Mechanical output from individual muscles during explosive leg extensions: the role of biarticular muscles. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Akinori Nagano,et al.  Longer moment arm results in smaller joint moment development, power and work outputs in fast motions. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Maarten F. Bobbert,et al.  The contribution of muscle properties in the control of explosive movements , 1993, Biological Cybernetics.

[5]  David A. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 1990 .

[6]  Akinori Nagano,et al.  Light finger touch on the upper legs reduces postural sway during quasi-static standing. , 2006, Motor control.

[7]  Akinori Nagano,et al.  Effects of Neuromuscular Strength Training on Vertical Jumping Performance— A Computer Simulation Study , 2001 .

[8]  M. Bobbert,et al.  Coordination in vertical jumping. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  W J Kraemer,et al.  Changes in muscle morphology, electromyographic activity, and force production characteristics during progressive strength training in young and older men. , 1998, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[10]  T Fukunaga,et al.  Tendinous movement of a human muscle during voluntary contractions determined by real-time ultrasonography. , 1996, Journal of applied physiology.

[11]  P Cerretelli,et al.  Human quadriceps cross-sectional area, torque and neural activation during 6 months strength training. , 1996, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[12]  R. Close Dynamic properties of mammalian skeletal muscles. , 1972, Physiological reviews.

[13]  C. Davies,et al.  Adaptive response of mammalian skeletal muscle to exercise with high loads , 1984, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[14]  T Abe,et al.  Relationship between sprint performance and muscle fascicle length in female sprinters. , 2001, Journal of physiological anthropology and applied human science.

[15]  F.E. Zajac,et al.  An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  K. Edman Double‐hyperbolic force‐velocity relation in frog muscle fibres. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.