Calibration of gamma camera systems for a multicentre European 123I-FP-CIT SPECT normal database

PurposeA joint initiative of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) Neuroimaging Committee and EANM Research Ltd. aimed to generate a European database of [123I]FP-CIT single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scans of healthy controls. This study describes the characterization and harmonization of the imaging equipment of the institutions involved.Methods123I SPECT images of a striatal phantom filled with striatal to background ratios between 10:1 and 1:1 were acquired on all the gamma cameras with absolute ratios measured from aliquots. The images were reconstructed by a core lab using ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) without corrections (NC), with attenuation correction only (AC) and additional scatter and septal penetration correction (ACSC) using the triple energy window method. A quantitative parameter, the simulated specific binding ratio (sSBR), was measured using the “Southampton” methodology that accounts for the partial volume effect and compared against the actual values obtained from the aliquots. Camera-specific recovery coefficients were derived from linear regression and the error of the measurements was evaluated using the coefficient of variation (COV).ResultsThe relationship between measured and actual sSBRs was linear across all systems. Variability was observed between different manufacturers and, to a lesser extent, between cameras of the same type. The NC and AC measurements were found to underestimate systematically the actual sSBRs, while the ACSC measurements resulted in recovery coefficients close to 100% for all cameras (AC range 69–89%, ACSC range 87–116%). The COV improved from 46% (NC) to 32% (AC) and to 14% (ACSC) (p < 0.001).ConclusionA satisfactory linear response was observed across all cameras. Quantitative measurements depend upon the characteristics of the SPECT systems and their calibration is a necessary prerequisite for data pooling. Together with accounting for partial volume, the correction for scatter and septal penetration is essential for accurate quantification.

[1]  J. Seibyl,et al.  Age-related decline in dopamine transporters: analysis of striatal subregions, nonlinear effects, and hemispheric asymmetries. , 2002, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

[2]  J S Fleming,et al.  Influence of collimator characteristics on quantification in SPECT. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  Akihiro Kojima,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of energy spectra for (123)I imaging. , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  E. Tolosa,et al.  Impact of dopamine transporter SPECT using 123I‐Ioflupane on diagnosis and management of patients with clinically uncertain parkinsonian syndromes , 2004, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[5]  Claus Svarer,et al.  Experimental determination of the weighting factor for the energy window subtraction–based downscatter correction for I-123 in brain SPECT studies , 2010, Journal of medical physics.

[6]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[7]  Irène Buvat,et al.  Quantitative accuracy of dopaminergic neurotransmission imaging with (123)I SPECT. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  W. Grove.  Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed , 1981 .

[9]  Elena Salvatore,et al.  Comparison between a dual-head and a brain-dedicated SPECT system in the measurement of the loss of dopamine transporters with [123I]FP-CIT , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[10]  Akihiro Kojima,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of energy spectra for 123I imaging , 2007 .

[11]  Michael Ljungberg,et al.  Correction for scatter and septal penetration using convolution subtraction methods and model-based compensation in 123I brain SPECT imaging-a Monte Carlo study. , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  B. Hutton,et al.  Partial volume correction in SPECT reconstruction with OSEM , 2011 .

[13]  J Sempau,et al.  Study of the point spread function (PSF) for 123I SPECT imaging using Monte Carlo simulation. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  R. Snider.  The Human Brain in Figures and Tables , 1969, Neurology.

[15]  John S. Fleming,et al.  Quantification of [123I]FP-CIT SPECT brain images: an accurate technique for measurement of the specific binding ratio , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[16]  Javier Pavía,et al.  Absolute quantification in dopaminergic neurotransmission SPECT using a Monte Carlo-based scatter correction and fully 3-dimensional reconstruction. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  J. Darcourt,et al.  EANM procedure guidelines for brain neurotransmission SPECT/PET using dopamine D2 receptor ligands, version 2 , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  I. McKeith,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of dopamine transporter imaging with 123I-FP-CIT SPECT in dementia with Lewy bodies: a phase III, multicentre study , 2007, The Lancet Neurology.

[19]  J Hashimoto,et al.  Effects of scatter and attenuation correction on quantitative analysis of beta-CIT brain SPET. , 1999, Nuclear medicine communications.

[20]  John S Fleming,et al.  The specific uptake size index for quantifying radiopharmaceutical uptake. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Scatter modelling and compensation in emission tomography , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[22]  K. Ogawa,et al.  Compton scatter compensation using the triple-energy window method for single- and dual-isotope SPECT. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Correction for Partial Volume Effects in Emission Tomography , 2006 .

[24]  Pablo Aguiar,et al.  Quantification of dopaminergic neurotransmission SPECT studies with 123I-labelled radioligands. A comparison between different imaging systems and data acquisition protocols using Monte Carlo simulation , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[25]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[26]  Philippe R. Franken,et al.  Influence of high-energy photons on the spectrum of iodine-123 with low- and medium-energy collimators: consequences for imaging with 123I-labelled compounds in clinical practice , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  K. Ogawa,et al.  A practical method for position-dependent Compton-scatter correction in single photon emission CT. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[28]  Osama Sabri,et al.  Investigating dopaminergic neurotransmission with 123I-FP-CIT SPECT: comparability of modern SPECT systems. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[29]  K. Ohtomo,et al.  Physical characteristics of low and medium energy collimators for 123I imaging and simultaneous dual-isotope imaging , 2003, Nuclear medicine communications.

[30]  Irène Buvat,et al.  Partial volume effect correction in SPECT for striatal uptake measurements in patients with neurodegenerative diseases: impact upon patient classification , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[31]  G. Pearlson,et al.  Basal ganglia volume in adults with Down syndrome , 1997, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[32]  Walter Koch,et al.  Cross-camera comparison of SPECT measurements of a 3-D anthropomorphic basal ganglia phantom , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[33]  Robert B. Innis,et al.  Effect of scatter correction on the compartmental measurement of striatal and extrastriatal dopamine D2 receptors using [123I]epidepride SPET , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[34]  Brian F. Hutton,et al.  The impact of reconstruction method on the quantification of DaTSCAN images , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.