Making livable sustainable systems unremarkable

Livable and sustainable are more than differently scaled considerations, they belong to different qualitative types. Livability is dynamic and unplanned. Sustainability is about rate-independent planning. Livability trumps sustainability in the present, but it is labile and so sustainability can wait it out until material pressures force a change. Sustainability is constrained but not determined by livability. Livability changes as resources become scarce. High gain systems take in fuel and burn it willy-nilly, yielding to thermodynamic description. Low gain takes in low quality material and refines it so it can be used as fuel. The refinement has preferred outcomes and yields to descriptions of efficiency. Livability is high gain while sustainability is low gain. The conflict between livability and sustainability makes their consideration juxtaposed a complex system. I recommend that teaching global systems thinking in the early school years will give the next generation a clarity of vision and a flexibility of mind that will help greatly as the vice on resources tightens. Making livable sustainable systems matter of fact to the next generation, making it unremarkable is the only fully promising path forward. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Steps Toward a Science of Service Systems , 2007, Computer.

[2]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  实践与反思 : 反思社会学导引 = An invitation to reflexive sociology , 1994 .

[3]  D. Shaw.  Sustainability and livability in the 2007 banking crisis: A failed transition to a low gain system , 2010 .

[4]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[5]  Howard Hunt Pattee,et al.  The complementarity principle in biological and social structures , 1978 .

[6]  Dennis L. Sepper.  Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I , 1991 .

[7]  Barbara Minto.  The Pyramid Principle: Logic in Writing and Thinking , 1981 .

[8]  H. Dreyfus.  Mind Over Machine , 1986 .

[9]  David Ing,et al.  ENVISIONING INNOVATION IN SERVICE SYSTEMS: INDUCTION, ABDUCTION AND DEDUCTION , 2009 .

[10]  John Zysman.  The algorithmic revolution---the fourth service transformation , 2006, CACM.

[11]  T. Allen,et al.  Resource Transitions and Energy Gain: Contexts of Organization , 2003 .

[12]  Stewart Brand,et al.  How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They're Built , 1997 .

[13]  S. Brand.  The Clock Of The Long Now: Time And Responsibility , 1999 .

[14]  J. Tainter,et al.  Epistemology of the Significance Concept , 1983, American Antiquity.

[15]  T. Allen,et al.  Dragnet Ecology—“Just the Facts, Ma'am”: The Privilege of Science in a Postmodern World , 2001 .

[16]  A. Young.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. , 2001 .

[17]  P. Bourdieu.  Algeria 1960 : the disenchantment of the world : the sense of honour : the Kabyle house or the world reversed : essays , 1979 .

[18]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[19]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[20]  L. Suchman.  Plans and situated actions , 1987 .

[21]  Megan M Pease,et al.  Integrating Economic Gain in Biosocial Systems , 2010 .

[22]  Ralph Hodgson.  Workshop summary: system envisioning , 1998, OOPSLA 1998.