Summary1.The responses of retinula cells and large monopolar cells (LMC's) to axial light flashes were recorded intracellularly in dark-adapted dragonflies (Figs. 1 and 4).2.LMC's respond to retinal illumination with a triphasic graded hyperpolarisation whose amplitude and waveform is intensity dependent. An initial hyperpolarising “on” transient is followed by a smaller amplitude sustained plateau. A rapid positive going “off” transient follows the cessation of the stimulus. Intensity is encoded as hyperpolarisation amplitude for action potentials are not recorded in these cells.3.Measurements of the difference between LMC and retinula response latency (2 msec, Fig. 6) and the LMC angular sensitivity (Fig. 7) confirm the previous anatomical studies suggesting that the LMC's are post-synaptic to retinula axons and receive their major input from axons with the same fields of view.4.Comparison of retinula and LMC response/intensity functions (Fig. 2) suggests that the visual signal is amplified when it is transferred from the retinula cell soma to a LMC.5.The derivation of average normalised response/intensity functions (Fig. 3) leads to an estimation of gain during the transfer of the LMC “on” transient and plateau amplitudes (Fig. 8). Their maximum values are times 14 and times 12, respectively.6.The possible mechanisms for producing amplification at this level in the visual system are discussed together with the significance of amplification in terms of the performance of the visual system.7.The synaptic noise level in the LMC's is high, from 4.2% to 15.6% of the maximum response amplitude with an average value of 8.6%. It is shown that this is equivalent to a receptor signal of 400 μV at threshold. It is proposed that the high noise level is the result of multiple synapses. It is shown that multiple synapses increase the visual signal: synaptic noise ratio in proportion to the square root of the number of synapses, in a manner analagous to a signal averager.8.It is concluded that the retinula-LMC pathway acts, in thedark-adapted state as a high sensitivity detection system, and shows several adaptations to maximise the signal:noise ratio.
[1]
Santiago Ramón y Cajal,et al.
Contribución al conocimiento de los centros nerviosos de los insectos
,
1915
.
[2]
J. Scholes,et al.
Discrete Subthreshold Potentials from the Dimly Lit Insect Eye
,
1964,
Nature.
[3]
O. Trujillo-Cenóz.
Some aspects of the structural organization of the intermediate retina of dipterans.
,
1965,
Journal of ultrastructure research.
[4]
Professor Dr. John C. Eccles,et al.
The Cerebellum as a Neuronal Machine
,
1967,
Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[5]
J. Dowling,et al.
Organization of the retina of the mudpuppy, Necturus maculosus. II. Intracellular recording.
,
1969,
Journal of neurophysiology.
[6]
R. Llinás,et al.
Electrophysiological analysis of synaptic transmission
,
1969
.
[7]
A. Kaneko.
Physiological and morphological identification of horizontal, bipolar and amacrine cells in goldfish retina
,
1970,
The Journal of physiology.
[8]
R. Gemperlein,et al.
bertragungseigenschaften der Sehzelle der SchmeifliegeCalliphora erythrocephala@@@Transfer characteristics of the visual cell ofCalliphora erythrocephala: 3. Verbesserung des Signal-Strungs-Verhltnisses durch prsynaptische Summation in der Lamina ganglionaris@@@3. Improvement of the signal-to-noise
,
1972
.
[9]
J. Dowling,et al.
Neural Organization of the Median Ocellus of the Dragonfly
,
1972,
The Journal of general physiology.
[10]
D W Arnett,et al.
Spatial and temporal integration properties of units in first optic ganglion of dipterans.
,
1972,
Journal of neurophysiology.
[11]
S. Shaw,et al.
Decremental conduction of the visual signal in barnacle lateral eye
,
1972,
The Journal of physiology.