Belief Revision and Ordered Theory Presentations

The standard theory of belief revision|known as the AGM theory after its authors, C. Al-chourrr on, P. GG ardenfors and D. Makinson 3]|suuers from at least two disadvantages. One is that it represents belief states as innnite objects, namely deductively closed sets of sentences. Another is that existing belief revision models make too strong assumptions about what information is available to guide revisions. A consequence of this is that repeated revisions are impossible. In this paper, we show how to use ordered theory presentations to represent belief states 1. Ordered theory presentations are theory presentations equipped with a partial order. In this paper we are only concerned with a special case, in which the sets are nite and the order is total, or linear. We deene a revision operator, which is shown to satisfy some, but not all, of the AGM postulates. No information other than that encoded in the OTP is needed to eeect the revision; this makes repeated revision easy.

[1]  Hans Rott,et al.  Two methods of constructing contractions and revisions of knowledge systems , 1991, J. Philos. Log..

[2]  Karl Schlechta Some results on theory revision , 1989, The Logic of Theory Change.

[3]  André Fuhrmann,et al.  Theory contraction through base contraction , 1991, J. Philos. Log..

[4]  Bernhard Nebel,et al.  Reasoning and Revision in Hybrid Representation Systems , 1990, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[5]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Relations between the logic of theory change and nonmonotonic logic , 1989, The Logic of Theory Change.

[6]  Mark Ryan,et al.  Defaults and revision in structured theories , 1991, [1991] Proceedings Sixth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science.

[7]  P G rdenfors,et al.  Knowledge in flux: modeling the dynamics of epistemic states , 1988 .

[8]  S. Hansson Belief base dynamics , 1991 .

[9]  Wlodzimierz Rabinowicz,et al.  Epistemic entrenchment with incomparabilities and relational belief revision , 1989, The Logic of Theory Change.