Production supervisor impacts on subordinates' safety outcomes: an investigation of leader-member exchange and safety communication.

PROBLEM Supervisors are increasingly important to the functioning of manufacturing operations, in large part due to their role as leaders. While supervisors' relations and communication with their subordinates are known to be important in influencing subordinates' behavior, little is known about how these two factors will impact subordinates' safety. This study investigated how much each factor contributes to safety-related outcomes for blue-collar production employees. METHOD Production employees at five Pennsylvania wood manufacturers completed a survey during their work shift. Five hundred and ninety eight employees provided data on leader-member exchange (LMX), safety communication, and safety-related events. Archival data on OSHA recordables were also obtained from the producers' human resources database. RESULTS Analyses found that the influence of LMX was greater than that of safety communication in predicting safety-related events. Neither LMX nor safety communication was significantly related to OSHA recordables. Results also demonstrated that employee job satisfaction and demographic variables such as gender and age have safety implications. IMPACT ON INDUSTRY Results from this study further emphasize the importance of production supervisors and illustrate the potential role of leader-member exchange in enhancing workplace safety. Specifically, organizations should foster positive social exchange between their employees and supervisors and enhance the leadership qualities of supervisors to help reduce workplace injuries.

[1]  Gail T. Fairhurst,et al.  The leader‐member exchange patterns of women leaders in industry: A discourse analysis , 1993 .

[2]  Cheri Ostroff.  The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational level analysis. , 1992 .

[3]  Gary Blau,et al.  Enacting Ecological Sustainability in the MNC: A Test of an Adapted Value-Belief-Norm Framework , 2005 .

[4]  A. Gouldner.  THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[5]  E. Kelloway,et al.  Development and test of a model linking safety-specific transformational leadership and occupational safety. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  C. Cooper,et al.  International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .

[7]  Larry E. Penley,et al.  Communication Abilities of Managers: The Relationship to Performance , 1991 .

[8]  Paul C. Nystrom,et al.  Vertical Exchanges and Organizational Commitments of American Business Managers , 1990 .

[9]  Judd Harrison Michael,et al.  Safety in the wood products industry , 2004 .

[10]  G. Graen,et al.  The effects of leader–member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. , 1982 .

[11]  Gail T. Fairhurst,et al.  Social structure in leader‐member interaction , 1989 .

[12]  Monica A. Hemingway,et al.  Organizational climate and occupational stressors as predictors of withdrawal behaviours and injuries in nurses , 1999 .

[13]  G. Graen,et al.  Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective , 1995 .

[14]  John W. Jones,et al.  Accident prevention through personnel selection , 1988 .

[15]  Kenneth J. Harris,et al.  An examination of the curvilinear relationship between leader–member exchange and intent to turnover , 2005 .

[16]  Marilyn M. Helms,et al.  The Relationship between Supervisory Communication and Subordinate Performance and Satisfaction among Professionals , 1989 .

[17]  D. Therkelsen,et al.  The supervisor: The linchpin of employee relations , 2004 .

[18]  David Laurence,et al.  Safety rules and regulations on mine sites - the problem and a solution. , 2005, Journal of safety research.

[19]  Randall P. Settoon,et al.  Social Exchange in Organizations: Perceived Organizational Support, Leader-Member Exchange, and Employee Reciprocity , 1996 .

[20]  S. Wayne,et al.  Commitment and employee behavior: comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. , 1993, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  Sherif Ali Mohtady Mohamed,et al.  Empirical investigation of construction safety management activities and performance in Australia , 1999 .

[22]  Stephen J. Gerras,et al.  Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: safety climate as an exemplar. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  A. H. Brayfield,et al.  AN INDEX OF JOB SATISFACTION , 1951 .

[24]  Julian Barling,et al.  High-performance work systems and occupational safety. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  Robert C. Liden,et al.  A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. , 1993 .

[26]  Robert J. Vandenberg,et al.  Creating safer workplaces: assessing the determinants and role of safety climate. , 2004 .

[27]  Joel M Haight,et al.  Management commitment to safety as organizational support: relationships with non-safety outcomes in wood manufacturing employees. , 2005, Journal of safety research.

[28]  L. Edna Rogers,et al.  Manager-Subordinate Control Patterns and Judgments About the Relationship , 1987 .

[29]  Sandra J. Hartman,et al.  Examining Communication Style and Leader-Member Exchange: Considerations and Concerns for Managers , 2003 .

[30]  Michael O’Toole,et al.  Successful Safety Committees: Participation Not Legislation , 1999 .

[31]  D. Zohar.  Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. , 1980, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  Wayne K. Talley,et al.  SAFETY INVESTMENTS AND OPERATING CONDITIONS: DETERMINANTS OF ACCIDENT PASSENGER-VESSEL DAMAGE COST , 1995 .

[33]  Charlotte R. Gerstner,et al.  Meta-Analytic Review of Leader-Member Exchange Theory: Correlates and Construct Issues , 1997 .

[34]  D. Hofmann,et al.  The role of safety climate and communication in accident interpretation: Implications for learning from negative events , 1998 .

[35]  David A. Hofmann,et al.  High reliability process industries: Individual, micro, and macro organizational influences on safety performance , 1995 .

[36]  Jane Mullen.  Testing a model of employee willingness to raise safety issues. , 2005 .

[37]  Barbara C Lee,et al.  Antecedents of injury among youth in agricultural settings: a longitudinal examination of safety consciousness, dangerous risk taking, and safety knowledge. , 2003, Journal of safety research.

[38]  Alison G Vredenburgh,et al.  Organizational safety: which management practices are most effective in reducing employee injury rates? , 2002, Journal of safety research.

[39]  D. Hofmann,et al.  Safety-related behavior as a social exchange: The role of perceived organizational support and leader–member exchange. , 1999 .

[40]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[41]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Perceived organizational support. , 1986 .

[42]  S. Wayne,et al.  The Effects of Leader-Member Exchange on Employee Citizenship and Impression Management Behavior , 1993 .

[43]  Gil Luria,et al.  The use of supervisory practices as leverage to improve safety behavior: a cross-level intervention model. , 2003, Journal of safety research.

[44]  R. Liden,et al.  Leader-Member Exchange Model of Leadership: A Critique and Further Development , 1986 .

[45]  Florence Stinglhamber,et al.  Organizations and supervisors as sources of support and targets of commitment: a longitudinal study , 2003 .

[46]  G. Graen,et al.  Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. , 1980 .